Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What do economists mean when they use the Latin expression ceteris paribus?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Latin phrase 'ceteris paribus' means 'all other things being equal'. Economists use it to simplify situations and focus on effects of only one change at a time, assuming that all other factors remain constant.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding of Latin Expression

Ceteris paribus is a Latin phrase that literally means 'all other things being equal'. It is used in economics to suggest that all variables remain constant apart from the one under consideration.
02

Application in Economics

In economics, 'ceteris paribus' is used to simplify the analysis of economic behavior. For instance, to analyze the effect of income on consumption, an economist would say ceteris paribus to imply that factors like prices, preferences and population stay constant, allowing the focus to remain solely on the relationship between income and consumption.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Economic Behavior Analysis
Economic behavior analysis is a cornerstone of economics, focusing on how individuals make decisions based on their preferences, constraints, and the information available to them.

When an economist examines the impact of a variable on an individual's economic decision, it's crucial to isolate that factor. This is where the term 'ceteris paribus' becomes essential. By holding other factors constant, economists can study the effects of changing one particular aspect on behavior without the noise from other variables.

For example, when analyzing how price changes impact the demand for a product, economists use ceteris paribus to look only at the relationship between price and demand, disregarding other potential influences like consumer income or the availability of substitutes. This simplification allows for a clearer understanding of causality and helps in predicting future economic behavior under similar conditions.
Income and Consumption Relationship
The relationship between income and consumption is a classic focus in economic studies, representing a direct indicator of economic health. High income often translates to increased consumption, as people typically spend more when they have more resources at their disposal.

Under the ceteris paribus assumption, economists can predict how consumption might change in response to variations in income. This relationship is graphically represented by the consumption function, a fundamental element in Keynesian economics. The consumption function suggests that there is a baseline level of consumption that does not change with income (autonomous consumption) and beyond that, consumption increases with increments in income at a rate determined by the marginal propensity to consume.

Using ceteris paribus helps to disregard temporary fluctuations or external factors that could cloud the true nature of the income-consumption relationship, such as temporary price changes or alterations in consumer preferences due to seasonal or trend-based factors.
Economic Models Simplification
In the realm of economics, creating models that accurately reflect the complexity of the real world is a challenging task. Simplification of economic models is therefore a requisite for better understanding and analysis.

The principle of ceteris paribus plays a significant role in this simplification process. By enabling economists to reduce the number of variables, they can construct models that focus on the essential components of economic phenomena, such as supply and demand or fiscal policy outcomes. These models are not intended to capture every detail but to provide insight into fundamental economic principles and predict outcomes in a controlled environment.

It's important to note, however, that while simplification aids in comprehension, it can also lead to the overlooking of significant factors that affect real-world scenarios. As such, while models serve as useful tools, they must be applied with an understanding of their limitations and the potential need for complexity when addressing actual economic situations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Toyota Prius is a gasoline/electric hybrid car that gets 54 miles to the gallon. An article in the Wall Street Journal noted that sales of the Prius had been hurt by low gasoline prices and that "Americans are now more likely to trade in a hybrid or an electric vehicle for an SUV." Does the article indicate that gasoline-powered cars and gasoline are substitutes or complements? Does it indicate that gasoline-powered cars and hybrids are substitutes or complements? Briefly explain. Source: Sean McClain, "Toyota's Prius Pays Price for Cheap Gasoline," Wall Street Journal, September 6, 2016 .

What do economists mean by shortage? By surplus?

[Related to Solved Problem 3.3 on page 88\(]\) An article discusees the market for autographs by Mickey Mantle, the superstar center fielder for the New York Yankees during the 1950 s and 1960 s, "At card shows, golf outings, charity dinners, Mr. Mantle signed his name over and over." One expert on sports autographs was quoted as saying, "He was a real good signer.... He is not rare." Yet the article quoted another expert as saying, "Mr. Mantle's autograph ranks No. 3 of most-popular autographs, behind Babe Ruth and Muhammad Ali." A baseball signed by Mantle is likely to sell for the relatively high price of \(\$ 250\) to \(\$ 400\). By contrast, baseballs signed by Whitey Ford, a teammate of Mantle's on the Yankees, typically sell for less than \(\$ 150\). Use one graph to show both the demand and supply for autographs by Whitey Ford and the demand and supply for autographs by Mickey Mantle. Show how it is possible for the price of Mantle's autographs to be higher than the price of Ford's autographs, even though the supply of Mantle autographs is larger than the supply of Ford autographs.

What do economists mean by market equilibrium?

Years ago, an apple producer argued that the United States should enact a tariff, or a tax, on imports of bananas. His reasoning was that "the enormous imports of cheap bananas into the United States tend to curtail the domestic consumption of fresh fruits produced in the United States." a. Was the apple producer assuming that apples and bananas are substitutes or complements? Briefly explain. b. If a tariff on bananas acts as an increase in the cost of supplying bananas in the United States, use two demand and supply graphs to show the effects of the apple producer's proposal. One graph should show the effect on the banana market in the United States, and the other graph should show the effect on the apple market in the United States. Be sure to label the change in equilibrium price and quantity in each market and any shifts in the demand and supply curves.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free