Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As indicated in the chapter, the CBO forecast that real GDP would grow at an average annual rate of 1.9 percent from 2017 to 2027 . The Trump administration pledged to raise the growth rate to 3 percent, although some policymakers and economists were skeptical that this goal could be achieved. Yet from 1960 to \(1969,\) real GDP grew at an average annual rate of 4.5 percent. Briefly discuss the factors that make growth rates that high more difficult to achieve today.

Short Answer

Expert verified
High growth rates like the 4.5% from 1960 to 1969 are now more difficult to achieve due to factors like an ageing population, the maturity of current technology, and contemporary economic policies that prioritize sustainability and economic stability.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the historical context

First, the historical context of GDP growth should be understood. The GDP growth rate of 4.5 percent from 1960 to 1969 was high due to a number of distinct factors during that time period, such as the effects of post-war economic boom, technological innovation increases, and rapidly growing populations.
02

Identify Current Limitations

Next, it's important to identify the current constraints to achieving a high GDP growth. This can include factors like ageing populations, the maturity of current technology, and economic policies which could have potential impacts on growth.
03

Discuss Specific Factors

In the last step, discuss these factors in detail. The ageing population is a significant factor because it leads to a slower labor force growth, which can limit GDP growth. Technological maturity implies there may be less scope for groundbreaking innovations that significantly boost productivity. And current economic policies may not favor rapid growth, due to concerns about sustainability and economic stability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Historical GDP Growth
Understanding historical GDP growth is crucial in grasping why modern economies may find it challenging to reach high growth rates experienced in the past, like the 4.5 percent annual rate from 1960 to 1969. The post-WWII era was a time of reconstruction and expansion for many economies, leading to what was termed as an economic boom.

During that period, a swell in the labor force due to the baby boom generation reaching working age, as well as significant advancements in technology and productivity, propelled economic growth. Suburbs expanded, consumer spending increased, and industries such as automotive and manufacturing thrived.

This historical context sets a backdrop that differs greatly from today's economic realities, where factors such as demographic changes, market saturation, and various forms of economic headwinds present more of a challenge to attaining such growth rates.
Economic Constraints
Currently, a variety of economic constraints can inhibit the potential GDP growth rate. An ageing population is one significant constraint as it results in a slower growth of the labor force, which in turn can dampen economic expansion. A smaller working-age population translates to less production and innovation, and potentially increases the burden on social services.

Other constraints include market saturation in various sectors, which means many products and services are already at a level of 'enough' in terms of consumer needs, leaving less room for explosive growth. Limits to natural resources and environmental issues also pose significant challenges, necessitating a focus on sustainable practices which may not always align with rapid economic expansion.

Moreover, the global economy's interconnectedness can also work as a limiting factor as economic downturns in one part of the world can have ripple effects elsewhere, making consistent high growth rates across all regions more difficult to achieve.
Technological Innovation
Technological innovation has historically been a key driver of economic growth, as seen during the 1960s. However, the argument goes that current technological advancements may not have the same econ-boosting impact. This is not to say that technological innovation isn't occurring, but rather that the nature of recent innovations might lead to less dramatic increases in productivity.

Today's technology sector is marked by rapid improvements in information technology, automation, and digitalization. While these advancements continue to transform how businesses operate and compete, the scale of productivity gains can be incremental as opposed to the large leaps seen in the past with the advent of, for instance, the automobile or widespread electricity use.

Hence, while technological innovation continues to contribute to economic growth, it might not single-handedly drive GDP growth rates to the high levels witnessed in the historical periods without parallel advances in other economic and policy domains.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why can a \(\$ 1\) increase in government purchases lead to more than a \(\$ 1\) increase in income and spending?

We saw that in calculating the stimulus package's effect on real GDP, economists in the Obama administration estimated that the government purchases multiplier has a value of 1.57 . John F. Cogan, Tobias Cwik, John B. Taylor, and Volker Wieland argued that the value is only 0.4 . a. Briefly explain how the government purchases multiplier can have a value of less than 1 . b. Why does an estimate of the size of the multiplier matter in evaluating the effects of an expansionary fiscal policy?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 969) The following is from a message by President Herbert Hoover to Congress, dated May 5,1932: I need not recount that the revenues of the Government as estimated for the next fiscal year show a decrease of about \(\$ 1,700,000,000\) below the fiscal year \(1929,\) and inexorably require a broader basis of taxation and a drastic reduction of expenditures in order to balance the Budget. Nothing is more necessary at this time than balancing the Budget. Do you think President Hoover was correct in saying that, in \(1932,\) nothing was more necessary than balancing the federal government's budget? Briefly explain.

Is it possible for Congress and the president to carry out an expansionary fiscal policy if the money supply does not increase? Briefly explain.

Which can be changed more quickly: monetary policy or fiscal policy? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free