Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A political columnist wrote the following: Today ... the main purpose [of governments issuing bonds] is to let craven politicians launch projects they know the public, at the moment, would rather not fully finance. The tab for these projects will not come due, probably, until after the politicians have long since departed for greener (excuse the expression) pastures. Do you agree with this commentator's explanation for why some government spending is financed through tax receipts and other government spending is financed through borrowing, by issuing bonds? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
While the aspect of the politicians' term in relation to bond repayment is thought-provoking, it's a narrow interpretation. Both tax receipts and bonds have their roles and implications in public finance. Deciding whether to use taxes or borrowings depends on multiple factors such as the nature of the project, fiscal policy, and economic conditions, not just political motives.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

The commentator's explanation suggests that governments issue bonds to finance projects that the public may not want to directly pay for through taxes. This is due to the fact that repayment of bonds potentially isn't due until future periods, possibly when current politicians aren't in office anymore. This prevents the immediate burden of financing from falling on the public through increased taxes.
02

Analyzing Tax Receipts

Taxes are a primary source of revenue for governments. They are relatively stable and predictable, providing consistent cash flow for ongoing operations and commitments. However, sudden, drastic increases in tax rates to fund large-scale projects could lead to public discontent and even economic disruption. Thus, taxes are primarily used for ongoing public expenditure and obligations.
03

Examining Borrowing through Bonds

Borrowing through bonds allows governments to mobilize large sums of money without immediate repayment obligations. This prevents sudden increases in tax rates and spreads the financial burden over a period of time. This can be particularly beneficial for large-scale, long-term projects and investments that payoff incrementally over time, but require substantial upfront costs.
04

Formulating Opinion

Considering these points, it can be partly agreed with the commentator's explanation. However, saying politicians issue bonds to avoid accountability or public opinion is a narrow view. The decision to borrow or tax is not only based on political convenience, but also on economic feasibility, nature of expenditure, and fiscal health of the government. It needs a balanced approach for sustainable public finance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Public Finance Fundamentals
Public finance is all about how the government manages its money. It includes collecting revenue (like taxes), spending on essential services, and managing national debt. Government plans are usually detailed in a budget, which helps them make the best use of these funds.

Understanding public finance is crucial because it affects everyone's daily life. It determines the quality of public services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
  • Efficient public finance ensures that these services run smoothly.
  • Tax policies and borrowing decisions are central to maintaining balance.
  • Government budgets often reflect the social and economic priorities of a nation.
Understanding Tax Receipts
Tax receipts are the money that the government collects from the public in the form of taxes. These are a reliable income source and are used to fund regular government operations. Taxes include income tax, sales tax, and property tax.

While taxes provide a consistent revenue stream, they come with certain challenges.
  • Tax increases can lead to public discontent and may impact economic activity.
  • Finding a balance between tax rates and economic growth is a key part of fiscal policy.
Tax receipts allow governments to make predictable plans and stick to them, as they provide stability and a clear picture of the resources available for public services.
The Role of Government Borrowing
Government borrowing involves issuing bonds to raise money that isn't immediately collected through taxes. Bonds are essentially a loan the government takes from investors, promising to pay back later with interest.

This process has several advantages and disadvantages:
  • It allows for the immediate rollout of large projects without burdening the taxpayers right away.
  • Borrowing can also spread the cost of long-term projects over many years.
  • However, excessive borrowing can lead to increased national debt and future financial strain.
The choice between borrowing or raising taxes depends on factors like project urgency, the political climate, and the economy's health.
Evaluating Political Economy
The political economy involves examining how political forces influence economic policies and practices. It's about understanding how government decisions impact economic behavior.

In the context of public finance and borrowing:
  • The government may choose to issue bonds based on political calculations, balancing public opinion and long-term objectives.
  • Policies can be shaped to either gain public favor or shift burdens to future administrations.
  • Good political economy practices advocate for transparency and accountability in financial decisions.
This field stresses the need for policies that are economically sound and politically viable, ensuring that fiscal decisions support growth and public welfare.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Wall Street Journal writers Josh Zumbrun and Nick Timiraos published answers to several of their readers' questions regarding the federal government's debt. The following were two of the questions. Write a brief response to each question. a. Why is government debt different from mine? b. How important is it to pay off this debt?

In The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, , ohn Maynard Keynes wrote: If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coal mines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise \(\ldots\) to dig the notes up again \(\ldots\) there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community \(\ldots\) would probably become a good deal greater than it is. Which important macroeconomic effect is Keynes discussing here? What does he mean by "repercussions"? Why does he appear unconcerned about whether government spending is wasteful?

Some economists argue that because increases in government spending crowd out private spending, increased government spending will reduce the long-run growth rate of real GDP. a. Is this outcome most likely to occur if the private spending being crowded out is consumption spending, investment spending, or net exports? Briefly explain. b. In terms of its effect on the long-run growth rate of real GDP, would it matter if the additional government spending involves (i) increased spending on highways and bridges or (ii) increased spending on national parks? Briefly explain.

In \(2009,\) Congress and the president enacted "cash for clunkers" legislation that paid up to \(\$ 4,500\) to people buying new cars if they traded in an older, low-gas-mileage car. Was this legislation an example of fiscal policy? Does your answer depend on what goals Congress and the president had in mind when they enacted the legislation?

Use an aggregate demand and aggregate supply graph to illustrate the situation where equilibrium initially occurs with real GDP equal to potential GDP and then the aggregate demand curve shifts to the left. What actions can Congress and the president take to move real GDP back to potential GDP? Show the results of these actions on your graph. Assume that the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve doesn't shift.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free