Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the equilibrium real federal funds rate is 2 percent and the target rate of inflation is 2 percent. Use the following information and the Taylor rule to calculate the federal funds rate target: Current inflation rate \(=4\) percent Potential \(\mathrm{GDP}=17.0\) trillion Real GDP \(=17.17\) trillion

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the Taylor Rule, the calculated target for the federal funds rate in this scenario would be 5%.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Inflation Gap

This is the difference between the current inflation rate and the target rate of inflation, calculated as: Inflation Gap = Current Inflation Rate - Target Inflation Rate = \(4\% - 2\% = 2% \)
02

Convert GDP to a Percentage Gap

The GDP gap is calculated as the percentage difference between Real GDP and Potential GDP: GDP Gap (%) = [(Real GDP - Potential GDP) / Potential GDP] * 100% = [ \( (17.17 \, trillion - 17.0 \, trillion) / 17.0 \, trillion ] * 100% = 1% \)
03

Use Taylor Rule to Calculate the Federal Funds Rate Target

The formula for the Taylor rule is: Federal Funds Rate Target = Equilibrium Real Rate + 1.5(Inflation Gap) + 0.5(GDP Gap) = \(2% + 1.5 * 2% + 0.5 * 1% = 5% \)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Federal Funds Rate
The federal funds rate is a critical tool used by the Federal Reserve (often referred to as the Fed) to influence the economy. It is the interest rate at which depository institutions trade federal funds—balances held at Federal Reserve Banks— with each other overnight. By manipulating this rate, the Fed can affect the money supply, which in turn has effects on inflation, employment, and overall economic growth.

The Federal Reserve sets a target for the federal funds rate based on its monetary policy objectives, which include maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates. To achieve these objectives, the Fed uses open market operations and other tools to push the market towards the target rate.

Significance of the Federal Funds Rate in Monetary Policy

The federal funds rate indirectly influences longer-term interest rates, which affects consumer and business borrowing costs, including for mortgages, car loans, and capital investment. Changes in these rates can then influence economic activity and inflation. The fed funds rate serves as a benchmark for many other interest rates and is a pivotal indicator for both markets and the general economy.
Inflation Gap
The inflation gap is a measure that shows the deviation of the current inflation rate from a target inflation rate, set by a central bank, like the Federal Reserve in the United States. It's essentially the percentage by which the actual price level, as measured by a consumer price index or other metric, is above or below the target.

An inflation gap can signal overheating in the economy when too high, or a slack when too low. Central banks might strive for a certain level of inflation as a way to spur economic growth without causing excessive price increases. The inflation gap helps them gauge if their monetary policy needs adjusting to bring inflation towards the targeted level.

Calculating the Inflation Gap

To calculate the inflation gap, as indicated in the step-by-step solution, you subtract the target inflation rate from the current inflation rate. For example, with a current inflation rate of 4% and a target of 2%, the inflation gap would be 2%. This positive gap indicates that the current inflation is higher than what the Fed targets, prompting potential monetary actions to cool down the economy and bring inflation back to the target level.
GDP Gap
The GDP gap, or output gap, quantifies the difference between the actual output of an economy and its potential output. Potential output is the level of economic activity that an economy can sustain over the long-term without increasing inflation. It refers to the maximum amount of goods and services an economy can produce when it is most efficient—that is, all resources are employed at their highest and best use.

A positive GDP gap suggests an economy is operating above its potential, which can lead to inflationary pressures as the demand for goods and services outstrips supply. Conversely, a negative GDP gap implies underuse of resources and can be indicative of a recessionary environment with high unemployment.

Assessing the Economic Condition

To assess the current economic condition using the GDP gap, you compare the actual GDP to the potential GDP, as demonstrated in the provided problem: a real GDP of 17.17 trillion and a potential GDP of 17.0 trillion yields a 1% GDP gap. This small positive gap indicates that the economy is slightly above potential output, suggesting a relatively healthy economic climate but also the possibility of inflationary pressures.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the Fed believes the economy is headed for a recession, what actions should it take? If the Fed believes the inflation rate is about to sharply increase, what actions should it take?

An article in a Federal Reserve publication observed that "20 or 30 years ago, local financial institutions were the only option for some borrowers. Today, borrowers have access to national (and even international) sources of mortgage finance." What caused this change in the sources of mortgage finance? What would be the likely consequence of this change for the interest rates borrowers have to pay on mortgages? Briefly explain.

Recall that securitization is the process of turning a loan, such as a mortgage, into a bond that can be bought and sold in secondary markets. An article in the Economist noted: That securitization caused more subprime mortgages to be written is not in doubt. By offering access to a much deeper pool of capital, securitization helped to bring down the cost of mortgages and made home-ownership more affordable for borrowers with poor credit histories. What is a "subprime mortgage"? What is a "deeper pool of capital"? Why would securitization give mortgage borrowers access to a deeper pool of capital? Would a subprime borrower be likely to pay a higher or lower interest rate than a borrower with a better credit history? Under what circumstances might a lender prefer to loan money to a borrower with a poor credit history rather than to a borrower with a good credit history? Briefly explain.

In explaining why monetary policy did not pull Japan out of a recession in the early \(2000 \mathrm{~s}\), an official at the Bank of Japan was quoted as saying that despite "major increases in the money supply," the money "stay[ed] in banks." Explain what the official means by saying that the money stayed in banks. Why would that be a problem? Where does the money go if an expansionary monetary policy is successful?

What are the key differences between how we illustrate an expansionary monetary policy in the basic aggregate demand and aggregate supply model and in the dynamic aggregate demand and aggregate supply model?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free