Chapter 26: Problem 3
How can investment banks be subject to liquidity problems?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Chapter 26: Problem 3
How can investment banks be subject to liquidity problems?
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeTwo economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland noted that "estimates of potential GDP are very fluid, [which] suggests there is considerable error in our current measure." They concluded that "this lack of precision should be recognized when policy recommendations are made using a Taylor-type rule." Briefly explain their reasoning.
An article on Reuters discussing a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) monetary policy meeting in early 2017 , stated that the RBI "changed its stance to 'neutral' from 'accommodative,' saying it would monitor inflation." The article noted that "the decision to hold [the interest rate that is the RBI's equivalent of the federal funds rate constant] is a risk, as private forecasts are more pessimistic [about economic growth] than the RBI." a. Draw a dynamic aggregate demand and aggregate supply graph to show where the RBI expected real GDP to be relative to potential GDP in 2017 if it kept the target interest unchanged. Assume, for simplicity, that real GDP in India in 2016 equaled potential GDP. Briefly explain what is happening in your graph. b. In the same graph, show where the private forecasters who are more pessimistic about growth see the economy in 2017 . Briefly explain what is happening in your graph.
What is a bank panic? Why are policymakers more concerned about bank failures than about failures of restaurants or clothing stores?
A 2017 article in the Wall Street Journal discussed the decision by Brazil's central bank to cut the SELIC rate, which is the equivalent in Brazil of the federal funds rate in the United States. According to the article, the cut occurred "as the country's inflation rate continues to fall quickly and the economy still struggles." a. In what sense do you think the Brazilian economy was "struggling" when this article was published? b. Why would a cut in the SELIC rate be an appropriate policy action at a time when the inflation rate was falling and the economy was struggling?
Explain whether you agree with this argument: If the Fed actually ever carried out a contractionary monetary policy, the price level would fall. Because the price level has not fallen in the United States over an entire year since the 1930s, we can conclude that the Fed has not carried out a contractionary policy since the \(1930 \mathrm{~s}\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.