Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An article in the Wall Street Journal discussing the relatively slow adoption of bitcoins by individuals and businesses noted, "The vast majority of consumers, certainly in the developed world, simply don't care about the benefits of decentralization and anonymity." a. Why would this observation help explain the slow adoption of bitcoins? b. The article qualifies the observation as applying to the developed world. Why might using bitcoins be more attractive to individuals and firms in developing countries, such as Brazil or India, than to individuals and firms in the United States?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The slow adoption of bitcoins in the developed world could be because the majority of consumers do not care about the benefits like decentralization and anonymity that bitcoin offers. However, in developing countries like Brazil or India, various factors such as economic instability, lack of access to digital transactions, and high levels of corruption might make bitcoin more attractive as it provides an alternative, easily accessible, and trustworthy means of transaction.

Step by step solution

01

How indifference to decentralization and anonymity slows bitcoin adoption

The main appeal of bitcoins lies in its decentralized nature and the anonymity it offers to its users. However, if consumers in the developed world do not value these benefits, it would naturally slow down the adoption since the key features of bitcoins are not appealing to them. Massive adoption requires a substantial number of consumers to see the benefits and thus adopt the product or technology.
02

Why bitcoins might be more attractive in developing countries

The economic conditions and regulatory environment in developing countries can make bitcoin more attractive. Some reasons could be economic instability where bitcoin offers an alternative asset, lack of access to digital forms of transactions where bitcoin can bridge the gap, or corruption and lack of trust in the government where bitcoin offers a decentralized and anonymous means of transaction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Decentralization and Anonymity in Cryptocurrency
The allure of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin hinges on two fundamental characteristics: decentralization and anonymity. Decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity, like a bank or government, to a distributed network. This means that transactions and issuance are managed collectively by the network, not by any single authority. Anonymity, on the other hand, ensures that the identity of the participants is not easily traceable.

Decentralization leads to a reduction in single points of failure, making the system more resilient against attacks or corruption. Meanwhile, anonymity provides privacy for users, a valued feature for those who wish to keep their financial dealings private. In the developed world, where robust financial institutions already exist, these features may not resonate as strongly. However, they are crucial in promoting the adoption of Bitcoin in environments where trust in financial institutions is weak or where privacy concerns prevail. Understanding these core concepts is crucial for grasping why Bitcoin, despite its innovative technology, may face slow adoption rates depending on the demographic and societal values.
Economic Stability and Digital Transactions
The role of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies extends beyond being merely an alternative currency; they also factor into the larger conversation about economic stability and digital transactions. In contexts where the local currency is prone to inflation or devaluation, digital transactions with cryptocurrencies offer a stable alternative. This stability is derived from cryptocurrencies' independence from any sovereign monetary policy, which can lead to inflation or economic instability.
Furthermore, digital transactions provide access to the financial system for those who are unbanked or underbanked. The traditional banking infrastructure requires significant investments, which can be a barrier in rural or impoverished areas. Cryptocurrencies eliminate many of these logistical barriers, providing a way for secure and immediate transactions over the internet. As such, Bitcoin becomes more than just a currency; it is a tool for achieving financial inclusion and economic empowerment. Adoption rates can surge where these factors are critical to the population, showcasing the potential for economic transformation through decentralized digital transactions.
Cryptocurrency Adoption in Developing Countries
When it comes to cryptocurrency adoption in developing countries, several factors contribute to its rising popularity. Developing nations, such as Brazil and India, often face challenges in their financial systems including inflation, corruption, and lack of access to banking services. Bitcoin, with its decentralized nature, offers an avenue for economic participation beyond the reach of flawed or restrictive financial institutions.

In regions where traditional banking services are scarce or mistrusted, Bitcoin can serve as a secure and efficient medium of exchange and store of value. This technology empowers users by circumventing the need for conventional banking infrastructure. Additionally, in countries with strict capital controls or where the legal tender is prone to rapid devaluation, Bitcoin provides an attractive option for wealth preservation.

Moreover, the transaction fees for sending Bitcoin are generally lower than traditional wire transfer fees, making it an economical choice for remittances—a common necessity in developing economies. This potential for facilitating cheaper and more effective cross-border transactions contributes further to the appeal of Bitcoin in developing countries. Understanding these market drivers is essential to apprehend why Bitcoin could be particularly appealing outside of the developed world, providing economic options not previously available.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In November 2016 , the Indian government decided to withdraw paper currency that made up more than 86 percent of the value of all rupee bills in circulation. An article in the Wall Street Journal published shortly after that decision described a small merchant in India as having "traded one customer a kilogram of potatoes, cauliflower and tomatoes for half a liter of honey. That was a good deal, he says. In normal times, the honey would be 120 rupees in the market (around \(\$ 1.80\) ) and the vegetables 70 rupees." Is this merchant's ability to arrange a barter deal with a customer an indication that the Indian economy doesn't actually require money to function efficiently? Briefly explain.

In a column in the Wall Street Journal, Kevin Brady, a member of Congress from Texas, stated, "To get Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act [in \(1913,\) President Woodrow] Wilson had to retain the support of \(\ldots\) northeastern lawmakers while convincing southern and western Democrats that legislation would not \(\ldots\) create a [single] central bank. Wilson's ingenious solution was federalism." Explain what Congressman Brady meant when he stated that Woodrow Wilson used "federalism" to convince Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act.

Distinguish among money, income, and wealth. Which one of the three does the central bank of a country control?

An article in the Wall Street Journal noted that online peer-to-peer lenders "have automated the processes of checking borrowers' credit metrics and looking up their histories while in many cases avoiding more labor-intensive practices of collecting and reviewing pay stubs or tax returns." The article also noted, "Charge-off rates, which reflect loans on which a lender doesn't expect to collect, have risen." a. Why do banks require borrowers to submit pay stubs and tax returns when applying for a loan? Why would online lenders skip this step in the loan application process? b. If online lenders find that borrowers are defaulting on loans at higher- than-expected rates, can they offset the problem by charging higher interest rates on the loans? Briefly explain.

If velocity does not change when the money supply of a country increases, will nominal GDP definitely increase? Will real GDP definitely increase? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free