Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An article in the Wall Street Journal noted that online peer-to-peer lenders "have automated the processes of checking borrowers' credit metrics and looking up their histories while in many cases avoiding more labor-intensive practices of collecting and reviewing pay stubs or tax returns." The article also noted, "Charge-off rates, which reflect loans on which a lender doesn't expect to collect, have risen." a. Why do banks require borrowers to submit pay stubs and tax returns when applying for a loan? Why would online lenders skip this step in the loan application process? b. If online lenders find that borrowers are defaulting on loans at higher- than-expected rates, can they offset the problem by charging higher interest rates on the loans? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Banks require pay stubs and tax returns to verify a borrower's ability to repay a loan whereas online lenders may skip these steps for a faster and more convenient loan application process, though it may lead to higher default rates. Online lenders could theoretically offset these higher default rates by charging higher interest rates. However, this practice can deter borrowers and might lead to more defaults, making it not a universally effective or sustainable solution.

Step by step solution

01

Explaining Bank Requirements for Loan Applications

Banks require borrowers to submit pay stubs and tax returns to verify the borrower's ability to repay the loan. These documents serve as proof of income and financial stability, which are important factors in assessing credit risk. Banks need to ensure that the borrower can meet the repayment terms of the loan without defaulting.
02

Understanding Online Lending Practices

Online peer-to-peer lenders often skip the process of collecting and reviewing pay stubs or tax returns, typically due to the automated nature of their loan application process. Automation makes the lending process quicker and cheaper, and it can also extend loans to customers who may not have access to traditional banking services. However, the downside is that automation may exclude some important consideration elements of individual's financial stability, leading to increased risk and higher default rates.
03

Higher Interest Rates as a Default Offset Strategy

In theory, online lenders could offset higher-than-expected default rates by charging higher interest rates. Higher interest rates may compensate for the losses incurred due to loan defaults. However, this practice can have other implications: it may discourage potential borrowers, especially those with better credit profiles, as higher interest rates mean costlier loans. It could also push riskier borrowers further into financial difficulty, potentially leading to even higher default rates. Therefore, while it's a possible strategy, it may not be a sustainable one in the long run.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Credit Risk Assessment
Credit risk assessment is a critical process in lending, where lenders evaluate the likelihood that a borrower may default on a loan. This assessment is essential because it helps lenders make informed decisions on whether to extend credit to an individual and at what terms. Banks traditionally require evidence of income, such as pay stubs and tax returns, to gauge a borrower's financial health. These documents provide a clearer picture of an individual's earning stability and capacity to repay the debt.

Automated online systems have revolutionized this process for peer-to-peer lenders. By utilizing algorithms to analyze borrowers' credit metrics and history, they have removed the need for physical document verification. While this streamlines the lending process and improves access to credit, it also removes a layer of in-depth, personal financial scrutiny, potentially undermining the accuracy of the risk assessment. A good practice for improving the credit risk assessment process would be to incorporate additional data sources that can provide a nuanced understanding of a borrower's financial situation, thus reducing the chances of a loan default.
Loan Default Rates
Loan default rates are a measure of the percentage of loans within a portfolio that borrowers have failed to repay according to the agreed terms. High default rates are concerning for lenders as they directly impact profitability. Peer-to-peer lenders, by automating credit checks and at times bypassing the collection of detailed financial documents, may experience rising charge-off rates, as noted in the Wall Street Journal article.

The occurrence of higher-than-expected default rates suggests that the automated risk assessment may not be capturing all elements of credit risk accurately. One way to improve oversight could be to enact post-loan issuance monitoring, which allows lenders to track a borrower's financial behavior, potentially flagging issues before they lead to default. Additionally, educational resources aimed at borrowers to understand their responsibilities and the repercussions of default can also play a role in mitigating loan defaults.
Interest Rates and Default
Interest rates bear a direct relationship to the perceived risk of default: the higher the risk, the higher the interest rate charged. Lenders, including online peer-to-peer platforms, may consider hiking interest rates to offset the losses from higher loan default rates. This strategy is rooted in the premise that increased revenue from higher interest can compensate for the losses incurred when a borrower defaults.

However, as the solution hints, this approach can be a double-edged sword. Higher interest rates can deter creditworthy individuals, skewing the borrower pool towards those who might already be at a higher risk of defaulting. Furthermore, expensive loans can lead to a cycle of debt that exacerbates the potential for default among riskier borrowers. An alternative approach might include tiered interest rate systems, rewarding borrowers with better credit profiles with lower rates, while still accounting for the risk. This method can help maintain a balanced borrower portfolio and prevent the spiral of higher default rates triggered by higher interest rates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Based on a Survey of Consumer Payment Choice, researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston estimated that the average consumer, 18 years of age and older, held about \(\$ 202\) in currency. However, as noted in the chapter, there is actually about \(\$ 4,500\) of currency in circulation for every person in the United States. a. How can the amount of U.S. currency in circulation be so much higher than the amount held by the U.S. population? b. What does the difference in part (a) imply about the measures of the money supply of the United States?

In the late \(1940 \mathrm{~s}\), the communists under Mao Zedong were defeating the government of China in a civil war. The paper currency issued by the Chinese government was losing much of its value, and most businesses refused to accept it. At the same time, there was a paper shortage in Japan. During those years, Japan was still under military occupation by the United States, following its defeat in World War II. Some of the U.S. troops in Japan realized that they could use dollars to buy up vast amounts of paper currency in China, ship it to Japan to be recycled into paper, and make a substantial profit. Under these circumstances, was the Chinese paper currency a commodity money or a fiat money? Briefly explain.

An article in the American Free Press quoted Professor Peter Spencer of York University in England as saying, "This printing of money 'will keep the [deflation] wolf from the door." The same article quoted Ambrose Evans- Pritchard, a writer for the London-based newspaper The Telegraph, as saying, "Deflation has ... insidious traits. It causes shoppers to hold back. Once this psychology gains a grip, it can gradually set off a self-feeding spiral that is hard to stop." a. What is price deflation? b. What does Spencer mean by the statement "This printing of money 'will keep the [deflation] wolf from the door'"? c. Why would deflation cause "shoppers to hold back," and what does Evans- Pritchard mean by saying "Once this psychology gains a grip, it can gradually set off a self-feeding spiral that is hard to stop"?

What is the main difference between the \(\mathrm{M} 1\) and \(\mathrm{M} 2\) definitions of the money supply? Why does the Federal Reserve use two definitions of the money supply rather than one?

Why do businesses accept paper currency when they know that, unlike a gold coin, the paper the currency is printed on is worth very little?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free