Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A study by the management consulting company McKinsey \& Company recommended that the federal government increase spending on infrastructure, such as bridges and highways, by between \(\$ 150\) and \(\$ 180\) billion per year. The study estimated that the result would be an increase in GDP of between \(\$ 270\) billion and \(\$ 320\) billion per year. What is the implied value of the multiplier if the McKinsey study's estimate of the effect of infrastructure spending on GDP is correct?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The implied value of the multiplier is between 1.5 and 2.13.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Lower bound and Upper bound of Spending and GDP Increase

The lower bound of spending is \$150 billion and the upper bound of spending is \$180 billion per year. Likewise, the lower bound of GDP increase is \$270 billion and the upper bound of GDP increase is \$320 billion per year.
02

Calculate the Lower bound and Upper bound of the Multiplier

The lower bound of the multiplier can be calculated by dividing the lower bound of the GDP increase by the upper bound of the spending since it gives the minimum value of the multiplier. Similarly, the upper bound of the multiplier can be calculated by dividing the upper bound of the GDP increase by the lower bound of the spending, since it gives the maximum value of the multiplier. Therefore, the lower bound of the multiplier = \(\frac{270}{180}\) = 1.5 and the upper bound of the multiplier = \(\frac{320}{150}\) = 2.13.
03

Interpret the Result

The value of the multiplier varies from 1.5 to 2.13. That means, an increase in government spending on infrastructure will increase GDP by 1.5 to 2.13 times the amount of spending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Government Spending
Understanding the impact of government spending is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of how a government can influence a nation's economy. In the scenario provided by McKinsey & Company, the federal government is advised to increase its spending on infrastructure. When the government decides to inject money into the economy, particularly through infrastructure projects such as building bridges and highways, it does so with the intent to fuel economic activity.

Increased government spending can lead to job creation, as these projects require labor. Moreover, it improves the efficiency of transportation and logistics, which benefits businesses and can lead to further economic growth. This spending becomes income for construction companies, workers, and suppliers, who then spend this income on other goods and services, creating a cascade of economic activity known as the multiplier effect.
GDP Growth
GDP, or Gross Domestic Product, is a measure of all goods and services produced within a country's borders and serves as a comprehensive scorecard of a country's economic health. The McKinsey study's prediction that an increase in infrastructure spending could boost the GDP significantly indicates the powerful influence such investments have on economic activity.

When the government spends more on infrastructure, it can enhance the productivity of industries by reducing transportation costs, shortening delivery times, and improving supply chain reliability. This increased efficiency can lead to higher output and sales, which contributes to GDP growth. By calculating a GDP increase range of between \(270 billion and \)320 billion from a spending boost of \(150 billion to \)180 billion, we can anticipate substantial economic benefits.
Infrastructure Investment
Infrastructure investment is seen as a cornerstone for long-term economic prosperity. Investing in infrastructure not only provides immediate benefits, such as employment opportunities, but also paves the way for sustained economic growth. In our given exercise, the proposed investment amounts are substantial, between \(150 billion and \)180 billion per year, but the returns are potentially even greater.

The effectiveness of infrastructure spending can be observed through the improved functionality of transport and communication networks, which facilitates trade and opens up regional markets for business expansion. Moreover, adequate infrastructure is fundamental for public services, enhancing the quality of life for citizens and making a location more attractive for investment by private enterprises.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 789) In an opinion column in the Wall Street Journal, Purdue University President Mitchell Daniels wrote that "today's 20 - and 30-year-olds are delaying marriage and delaying childbearing, both unhelpful trends from an economic and social standpoint." Why might young people be delaying marriage and childbearing? Why would this trend be unhelpful from an economic point of view? Is the trend possibly connected with the slow recovery from the \(2007-2009\) recession? Briefly explain.

An \(M P C\) equal to 0 implies a multiplier of 1 , meaning that \(\$ 1\) increase in autonomous expenditures would increase real GDP by only \(\$ 1 .\) Why does an \(M P C\) equal to 0 result in no multiplier effect? Conversely, an MPC equal to 1 implies an infinite multiplier, meaning that a \(\$ 1\) increase in autonomous expenditures would increase real GDP by an infinite amount. Why does an \(\mathrm{MPC}\) of 1 result in an infinite multiplier? Explain your answers using the logic of the multiplier process.

An article published in an economics journal found the following: "For the poorest households, the marginal propensity to consume was close to \(70 \% .\) For the richest households, the MPC was only \(35 \%\)." Assume that the macroeconomy can be divided into three sections. Section A consists of the poorest households, Section \(\mathrm{B}\) consists of the richest households, and Section C consists of all other households. a. Compute the value of the multiplier for Section A. b. Compute the value of the multiplier for Section \(\mathrm{B}\). c. Assume that there was an increase in planned investment of \(\$ 4\) billion. Compute the change in equilibrium real GDP if the \(M P C\) for the economy was 70 percent (or 0.70\()\). Compute the change in equilibrium real GDP if the \(M P C\) for the economy was 35 percent (or 0.35\()\).

(Related to the Chapter Opener on page 776) Suppose that Intel is forecasting demand for its computer chips during the next year. How will the forecast be affected by each of the following? a. A survey shows a sharp rise in consumer confidence that income growth will be increasing. b. Real interest rates are expected to increase. c. The value of the U.S. dollar is expected to increase in exchange for foreign currencies. d. Planned investment spending in the economy is expected to decrease.

Use a \(45^{\circ}\) -line diagram to illustrate macroeconomic equilibrium. Make sure your diagram shows the aggregate expenditure function and the level of equilibrium real GDP and that your axes are properly labeled.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free