Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Writing in 2016 , economist Robert Gordon of Northwestern University stated his views of the effects of information technology on the economy: We don't eat computers or wear them or drive to work in them or let them cut our hair. We live in dwelling units that have appliances much like those of the 1950 s, and we drive in motor vehicles that perform the same functions as in the 1950 s, albeit with more convenience and safety.... Most of the economy has already benefited from the Internet and web revolution, and in this sphere of the economic activity, methods of production have been little changed over the past decade . The revolutions in everyday life made possible by e-commerce and search engines were already well established [by 2004]. If Gordon's observations about the information revolution are correct, what are the implications for future labor productivity growth rates in the United States?

Short Answer

Expert verified
If Robert Gordon's observations are correct, the implication could be slower growth rates in labor productivity for the future. This is because significant technological transformations, which previously led to increased labor productivity, seem to have plateaued recently according to Gordon.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Gordon's Views

Robert Gordon noted two things. First, that we still use some technologies that have only marginally changed since the 1950s (like housing and vehicles) and, second, that most of the economy has already benefited from the Internet revolution, suggesting no significant changes in production methods in the last decade.
02

Understanding Labor Productivity

Labor productivity is a measure of economic performance that compares the amount of goods and services produced (output) with the number of hours worked to produce those goods and services. It generally improves with technological advancements, as these allow more to be produced with the same amount of labor.
03

Drawing Implications

Based on Gordon's observations, if technology improvements have plateaued and are no longer significantly changing production methods, this suggests that they will not contribute as substantially to future labor productivity growth. In other words, without further technological revolutions, labor productivity may not increase at previously seen rates.
04

Explanation of the Implications

A slowdown in technological advancements could affect labor productivity growth rates. Since technologies have dramatically improved productivity in the past, their saturation could lead to a slowdown in productivity growth. This could imply slower economic growth unless offset by other factors such as increased labor force participation or improvements in education and skills training.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Technology and Economic Growth
Technology has a profound effect on economic growth by improving the efficiency of production processes. In simple terms, economic growth occurs when more goods and services are produced and available for consumption. Improved technology enables companies to produce more using less labor or fewer resources. This means that an economy can grow rapidly if technological advancements continue to enhance productivity. For example, during the Industrial Revolution, new machines in factories allowed goods to be produced faster and in greater quantities than ever before. Fast forward to recent times, the digital revolution transformed businesses through computers and the internet, enabling significant leaps in productivity. However, economist Robert Gordon argues that the impact of technological advancements on growth might be slowing. This brings us to a crucial point: if technology no longer boosts productivity as it used to, economic growth could also slow down. This effect hinges on the saturation of technological advancements that no longer provide the same returns in labor productivity.
Information Technology Impact
Information Technology (IT) has had a massive impact on how businesses operate and grow. It has revolutionized communication, data management, and operational efficiency. Think about how much faster we communicate today compared to just a few decades ago. Emails, instant messaging, and video conferencing have dramatically enhanced speed and ease of business communication. Moreover, IT has allowed firms to optimize their operations through data analytics, allowing businesses to make informed decisions quickly. However, according to Gordon, much of the IT-driven transformation took place before 2004, implying we are not seeing the same radical changes recently. What does this mean for future growth? Even though businesses have optimized current technologies, further breakthroughs may be required to drive significant productivity gains. The potential plateau in technological impacts suggests that unless groundbreaking innovations emerge, the benefits we've seen from IT may not significantly enhance productivity further.
Economic History
Examining economic history helps us understand how past technological advancements fueled economic growth. Over the centuries, waves of innovations such as the steam engine, electricity, and the internet have all pushed economies forward. Each technological wave brought with it extraordinary improvements in productivity which, in turn, propelled GDP growth and improved living standards. However, every growth wave eventually faces diminishing returns. This historic pattern aligns with Gordon's views on the information revolution. Once technologies are integrated into the economy, the initial huge uptick in productivity eventually slows down. Previously, this slowdown was often rejuvenated by the next wave of innovations. Understanding this cycle is vital when analyzing current growth prospects. Whether another technological wave is on the horizon to boost future productivity remains uncertain. This historical perspective highlights the importance of continuous innovation to sustain long-term economic growth.
Robert Gordon's Economic Analysis
Robert Gordon's economic analysis presents a detailed understanding of how the nature of recent technological innovations differs from past transformative changes. Gordon notes that current technologies, like computers and the internet, while revolutionary, may not be as dramatic in impact as the introduction of electricity or automobiles in the past. His analysis suggests that while the information technology revolution generated significant improvements, particularly in communication and information access, the pace of new groundbreaking inventions has slowed. This could mean a plateau in labor productivity growth, affecting overall economic growth if not augmented by other growth factors. Gordon's observations prompt policymakers and businesses to consider other avenues for boosting productivity. Areas such as education, infrastructure, and policies targeting human capital development might play crucial roles. In essence, Gordon's economic analysis encourages rethinking growth strategies in an era where traditional technological booms may not occur as frequently.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 2017 , in a speech in China, Apple CEO Tim Cook stated that globalization is "great for the world . I think the reality is you can see that countries in the world that isolate themselves, it's not good for their people." a. Why would countries that isolate themselves rather than participate fully in the global economy be hurting their own people? b. Is there an argument to be made that globalization hurts rather than helps some economies? Briefly explain.

More people in high-income countries than in lowincome countries tend to believe that rapid rates of economic growth are not desirable. Recall the concept of a "normal good" (see Chapter 3). Does this concept provide insight into why some people in high-income countries might be more concerned with certain consequences of rapid economic growth than are people in low-income countries?

An article in the Economist on the Mexican economy noted, "A huge, unproductive informal sector and general lawlessness also drag the economy down." If these factors were the main barriers to more rapid economic growth in Mexico, would that be good news or bad news for the Mexican government's attempts to increase its economy's growth rate? Briefly explain.

What is the new growth theory? How does the new growth theory differ from the growth theory developed by Robert Solow?

Why are firms likely to underinvest in research and development? Briefly discuss three ways in which government policy can increase the accumulation of knowledge capital.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free