Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In 2017 , in a speech in China, Apple CEO Tim Cook stated that globalization is "great for the world \(\ldots .\) I think the reality is you can see that countries in the world \(\ldots\) that isolate themselves, it's not good for their people." a. Why would countries that isolate themselves rather than participate fully in the global economy be hurting their own people? b. Is there an argument to be made that globalization hurts rather than helps some economies? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Isolating a country from the global economy can limit their access to goods, resources, and opportunities, which can result in less variety and potentially higher costs for its people. While globalization provides benefits such as access to larger markets, it can also disadvantage some economies, leading to increased competition, job loss and economic instability, and cultural erosion. Each country's situation should be considered individually, and a balanced approach to globalization is advised.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Impact of Isolation from Global Economy

Countries that isolate themselves from the global economy could be hurting their own people in multiple ways. One major way is through limited access to resources and goods. In a globalized economy, countries often specialize in producing goods they are most efficient at making, and then trade for goods that other countries specialize in. This allows for a greater variety of goods and services, often at more competitive prices. When a country isolates itself, it limits its access to these global goods and resources, which can lead to less variety and potentially higher costs for its people.
02

Explaining How Globalization Can Hurt Economies

While globalization offers many benefits, including access to a larger market and diversified resources, it can also have negative impacts on some economies. One primary discomfort comes from increased competition, which can disadvantage certain economies, particularly those with less competitive industries. In addition, globalization can lead to job displacement, as companies might move operations to countries where labor costs are cheaper. This can lead to unemployment and economic instability in the affected countries. Other potential issues include economic dependency on international markets, and cultural erosion due to the influence of dominant countries.
03

Summarizing the Key Points

Summarizing the key points from the analysis, it can be said that isolation from the global economy limits a country's access to foreign goods and resources, which can impact the people negatively. On the other hand, while globalization can benefit many economies by providing access to a larger market and diverse resources, it can also hurt some economies through increased competition, job displacement, and other negative impacts.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Impact of Isolation on Economy
In an increasingly interconnected world, isolating an economy can have profound consequences. Isolation can prevent a country from participating in the exchange of not just products and services, but also ideas and advancements in technology.

When a country opts for isolation, it may attempt to be self-sufficient. However, self-sufficiency often comes at a high cost due to inefficiencies in producing goods that are otherwise more cheaply or qualitatively imported from abroad. This resistance to the global supply chain can result in higher prices and limited availability of goods for consumers. Moreover, isolation can lead to a stagnation in innovation, as countries miss out on the cross-pollination of knowledge that globalization fosters.

Additionally, when a country is isolated, it doesn't benefit from 'economies of scale'—the cost advantages that arise with an increased level of production—which global trade typically provides. Therefore, the population might face a lower standard of living due to the reduced variety and higher cost of goods and services.
Global Trade and Specialization
Global trade is built on the principle of comparative advantage, which suggests that countries should produce and export goods in which they are relatively more efficient, and import goods where they are less efficient. This leads to specialization, with economies focusing on certain industries or sectors where they hold an advantage, be it through natural resources, skilled labor, or technological prowess.

Specialization and global trade together support a more efficient allocation of resources, which is key to increasing productivity and economic growth. For example, countries with favorable climates for agriculture may focus on the production of fruits and grains, while others with advanced industrial capacities might specialize in manufacturing complex electronics. As a consequence, there's an optimization of global resources, leading to an overall boon in prosperity.

Trade allows nations to enjoy a broader diversity of goods than they would be able to produce domestically. This diversity leads to increased competition, which can drive quality up and prices down, benefiting consumers worldwide. However, it also demands a nimble and adaptable workforce, as industries evolve and shift according to global market trends.
Negative Effects of Globalization
Despite its benefits, globalization carries significant negative effects that can undermine national economies and labor markets. One significant disadvantage is the exposure to international competition, which can decimate local industries incapable of keeping up in terms of price or quality. This can result in widespread job losses and the erosion of traditional industries, particularly impacting less developed economies.

Globalization can also exacerbate economic inequalities, as benefits tend to be unevenly distributed. Wealthier, more developed nations often are better equipped to take advantage of the new global marketplace, while developing nations may become more dependent or overspecialized in limited sectors, which can be volatile.

Furthermore, a global economy requires a workforce that is mobile and continuously retrained to meet changing demands. Not all economies can support such flexibility, leading to social and economic strains. There's also the concern of cultural homogenization, where local traditions and identities get subsumed by dominant cultural exports. In summary, while globalization brings many economic advantages, the transitional pain for certain economies and communities can be substantial, necessitating careful policy responses to mitigate such negative effects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Can economic analysis arrive at the conclusion that economic growth will always improve economic well-being? Briefly explain.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 742) In his book The White Man's Burden, William Easterly reported: A vaccination campaign in southern Africa virtually eliminated measles as a killer of children. Routine childhood immunization combined with measles vaccination in seven southern African nations starting in 1996 virtually eliminated measles in those countries by \(2000 . \mathrm{A}\) national campaign in Egypt to make parents aware of the use of oral rehydration therapy from 1982 to 1989 cut childhood deaths from diarrhea by 82 percent over that period. a. Is it likely that real GDP per capita increased significantly in southern Africa and Egypt as a result of the near elimination of measles and the large decrease in childhood deaths from diarrhea? If these events did not increase real GDP per capita, is it still possible that they increased the standard of living in southern Africa and Egypt? Briefly explain. b. Which seems more achievable for a developing country: the elimination of measles and childhood deaths from diarrhea or sustained increases in real GDP per capita? Briefly explain.

An article in the Economist on the Mexican economy noted, "A huge, unproductive informal sector and general lawlessness also drag the economy down." If these factors were the main barriers to more rapid economic growth in Mexico, would that be good news or bad news for the Mexican government's attempts to increase its economy's growth rate? Briefly explain.

More people in high-income countries than in lowincome countries tend to believe that rapid rates of economic growth are not desirable. Recall the concept of a "normal good" (see Chapter 3). Does this concept provide insight into why some people in high-income countries might be more concerned with certain consequences of rapid economic growth than are people in low-income countries?

An article in the Wall Street Journal in mid-2017 noted, "Mexico's economy kept up steady growth in the first quarter, expanding for a 15 th consecutive period despite concerns that strained trade and investment relations with the U.S. will bring about a sharp slowdown." During this period, why were some observers concerned about Mexico's economic relations with the United States? Why are these relations particularly important if the Mexican economy is to experience sustained growth?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free