Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What does the employment-population ratio measure? How does an unemployed person dropping out of the labor force affect the unemployment rate? How does it affect the employment-population ratio?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The employment-population ratio measures the proportion of the country's working-age population that is employed. When an unemployed person drops out of the labor force, it can affect the unemployment rate and the employment-population ratio differently. For the unemployment rate, it could either increase, decrease, or remain the same depending on the relative sizes of the remaining unemployed and the total labor force. For the employment-population ratio, it will either remain the same or decrease if the person was previously employed.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Employment-Population Ratio

The employment-population ratio is a statistical ratio that measures the proportion of the country's working-age population (ages 15 to 64 in most OECD countries) that is employed. Basically, it is calculated as (employed individuals / total working-age population) x 100.
02

Define the Unemployment Rate

The unemployment rate is a measure of the prevalence of unemployment and it is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force. It is the measure of the number of people who are jobless, actively seeking work, and available to take a job as a proportion of the total labor force (unemployed + employed). The formula is (unemployed individuals / total labor force) x 100.
03

Explain how an unemployed person dropping out of the labor force affects these indicators

When an unemployed person drops out of the labor force, they are no longer considered as 'unemployed' or a part of the 'labor force'. This leads to a decrease in both the numerator and denominator of the unemployment rate, which could either increase, decrease, or remain the same depending on the relative sizes of the remaining unemployed and the total labor force. For the employment-population ratio, the denominator (total working-age population) will remain constant, but the numerator (employed individuals) won’t be affected by this change. Hence, the employment-population ratio will either remain the same or decrease (if the person was previously employed).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Unemployment Rate
One key aspect of understanding the labor market is the unemployment rate. The unemployment rate is an indicator of how many people in the labor force are without jobs but are actively seeking employment and are available to start work. This rate is crucial as it helps to assess the health of an economy. If you consider an economically healthy country, it often has a low unemployment rate.
The formula for calculating this rate is fairly simple:
  • Unemployment Rate = (Number of Unemployed People / Total Labor Force) x 100
What's interesting is how sensitive the unemployment rate can be. Let's say someone decides to stop looking for work entirely—they decide to leave the labor force. This action can cause changes in the unemployment rate. The decrease in the number of unemployed affects the equation's denominator and numerator. Because of this, the unemployment rate may either increase, decrease, or even remain unchanged, depending on the specific numbers involved. Therefore, it's an important indicator that can often reflect deeper structural changes in the economy rather than just surface-level activity.
Labor Force Participation
Understanding labor market indicators requires a grasp on labor force participation. This term refers to the portion of the working-age population that is either working or actively seeking work. It provides insights into the availability of labor in the economy and indicates how many individuals are engaged in or looking to engage in the economic processes.
To express it mathematically, the labor force participation rate is calculated as:
  • Labor Force Participation Rate = (Labor Force / Working-Age Population) x 100
A healthy participation rate often suggests that a large proportion of the potential workforce is either employed or seeking employment. However, this rate can also fluctuate for various reasons such as demographic changes, economic conditions, or even social factors. Like, when people retire early, or if discouraged workers stop seeking employment they drop out of this category. Such changes can crucially affect the unemployment rate and employment-population ratio, giving policymakers insight into the motivations and economic conditions of their country.
Labor Market Indicators
Labor market indicators provide valuable insights into the economic activity related to employment. These indicators include the unemployment rate, the labor force participation rate, and the employment-population ratio, each offering a unique segment of the market picture.
Unemployment rates show the proportion of the labor force that is unable to secure employment, highlighting issues like job availability and economic conditions. In contrast, labor force participation rates reveal the percentage of people who are either working or searching for work. Together, they help determine the general engagement of the population with the labor market.
  • The employment-population ratio shows the working percentage of the population outside of those merely seeking work.
  • These indicators must be interpreted together to gain comprehensive market insights.
  • Changes in one indicator often cause shifts in the others, reflecting real-world actions and decisions.
For example, when individuals stop seeking employment and leave the labor force as discouraged workers, it can create discrepancies in these rates. Economists and policymakers rely on these data points to assess and respond to economic challenges.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describing the economy in England in \(1920,\) the historian Robert Skidelsky wrote the following: "Who would not borrow at 4 percent a year, with prices going up 4 percent a month?" What was the real interest rate paid by borrowers in this situation? (Hint: What is the annual inflation rate, if the monthly inflation rate is 4 percent?)

What potential biases exist in calculating the CPI? To have no substitution bias, what shape would the demand curve need to be for the products in the market basket? What steps has the Bureau of Labor Statistics taken to reduce the size of the biases?

(Related to the Don't Let This Happen to You on page 681 ) An article in the Wall Street Journal asked "How can inflation be low when everything is so expensive?" The article also noted that "the CPI shows that prices are the highest they've ever been." Is there a contradiction between a low inflation rate as measured by the CPI and the observations that prices are "the highest they've ever been" and everything is "so expensive"? Briefly explain.

(Related to Solved Problem 20.5 on page 683 ) In 1924 , the famous novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote an article for the Saturday Evening Post titled "How to Live on \(\$ 36,000\) a Year," in which he wondered how he and his wife had managed to spend all of that very high income without saving any of it. The CPI in 1924 was \(17,\) and the CPI in 2016 was 240 . What income would you have needed in 2016 to have had the same purchasing power that Fitzgerald's \(\$ 36,000\) had in \(1924 ?\) Be sure to show your calculation.

An article in the Economist about Venezuela stated, "The economy is in such an appalling state, and inflation is so high, that Venezuelans greeted a rise of \(60 \%\) in the minimum wage on May 1 st with shrugs of 'so what?" What would be two reasons the people of Venezuela would shrug off a rise in the minimum wage of 60 percent?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free