Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and his other books about the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}, \mathrm{L}\). Frank Baum observed that if people's wants were limited enough, most goods would not be scarce. According to Baum, this was the case in Oz: There were no poor people in the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}\), because there was no such thing as money.... Each person was given freely by his neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as anyone may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops of grain, which was divided equally among the whole population, so that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than people needed.... You will know, by what I have told you here, that the Land of Oz was a remarkable country. I do not suppose such an arrangement would be practical with us. Briefly explain whether you agree with Baum that the economic system in Oz wouldn't work in the contemporary United States.

Short Answer

Expert verified
While Baum's economic system seems idyllic, it appears impractical for the contemporary United States. Differences in population scale, scarcity of resources, human nature of ambition and competition, and substantial government's role in the economy are factors that challenge its implementation.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Baum’s economic system

Reading carefully through the passage, one can understand how Baum's economic system works. In the Land of Oz, people’s wants are limited, goods are not scarce, everyone is given freely by their neighbours what they require for their use, and everything is divided equally among the population.
02

Understand the contemporary United States economic system

Secondly, one needs to have a basic understanding of how the present economic system works in the United States. The U.S operates on a mixed-market economy, where most decisions are made by the market (suppliers and consumers' demand), but the government also plays a significant role.
03

Comparison

Finally, it's time for comparison. Is the unlimited supply of all resources, equal distribution, and free availability of goods, observed in Baum's Land of Oz, practical in the United States? One can argue by considering factors like population, resources availability, government policies, citizens' lifestyle, and consumption habits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scarcity
Imagine a world where you could have everything you wanted without ever worrying about running out. That’s the enchanting idea in the Land of Oz. In reality, the concept of scarcity plays a critical role in economic systems. Scarcity refers to the fundamental economic problem of having seemingly unlimited wants but limited resources.
Resources such as time, money, and raw materials are finite. Therefore, choices must be made about how to use these resources efficiently.
  • Scarcity forces individuals and societies to make decisions about what to produce, how to produce, and for whom.
  • Resources are allocated based on their availability and necessity.
In practical terms, scarcity means that people cannot have everything they want, which leads to the need for prioritization and trade-offs. Unlike the fantasy world of Oz, where scarcity doesn’t exist, real-world economies must tackle this issue daily to ensure that needs and desires are met as effectively as possible.
Mixed-Market Economy
A mixed-market economy is like a balanced recipe, where both free-market principles and government intervention are blended to achieve economic goals.
In a mixed-market economy like the United States, several key components play together to shape how resources are allocated. The government intervenes to regulate or support certain industries, provide public goods, or protect the environment, while still allowing markets to function freely.
  • The balance of power between market forces and government can vary significantly from country to country.
  • Market-driven factors include supply and demand dynamics, competition, and consumer choice.
This combination aims to provide the benefits of a free market with oversight to avoid economic disparities and ensure that public interest is maintained. Mixed-market economies strive to balance efficiency with equal opportunity and fairness—offering a blueprint far different from the idea in Oz, where community needs dictate the distribution of goods without interference.
Resource Distribution
Resource distribution is the method and approach used to allocate resources among individuals and groups within an economy. In the fictional realm of Oz, goods were freely shared among everyone, ensuring that all had what they needed at all times. However, in today's world, resource distribution is much more complex.
In modern economies, various factors determine who gets what, when, and how much, including:
  • Market competition, where resources are distributed based on consumer willingness to pay.
  • Government policies, which may include redistribution via taxes and public goods provision.
  • Social and cultural influences that can affect who has access to certain resources.
The ultimate goal of resource distribution is ensuring that the needs of the population are met while also promoting economic growth and stability. As seen in real-world settings, this often involves balancing efficiency with equity—a challenge not witnessed in the idyllic land of Oz.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, Staples Inc., an office supply store, "has found a new use for some of its roomy office-supply stores: make parts of them into offices." Because many businesses now store their records digitally and many consumers shop online rather than in stores, Staples no longer needs as much floor space for filing cabinets and some other products. To use the surplus space, Staples has undertaken a partnership with Workbar, an office-sharing firm, to offer small business owners and professionals shared workspaces inside select Staples retail stores. In these circumstances, does Staples incur a cost from using some of the space in its retail stores for office workspaces? If Staples does incur a cost, briefly explain what the cost would be.

Can an individual or a country produce beyond its production possibilities frontier? Can an individual or a country consume beyond its production possibilities frontier? Briefly explain.

Suppose the U.S. president is attempting to decide whether the federal government should spend more on research to find a cure for heart disease. Imagine that you are the president's economic advisor and need to prepare a report discussing the relevant factors the president should consider. Use the concepts of opportunity cost and trade-offs to discuss some of the main issues you would deal with in your report.

Lawrence Summers served as secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration and as director of the National Economic Council in the Obama administration. He has been quoted as giving the following defense of the economic approach to policy issues: There is nothing morally unattractive about saying: We need to analyze which way of spending money on health care will produce more benefit and which less, and using our money as efficiently as we can. I don't think there is anything immoral about seeking to achieve environmental benefits at the lowest possible costs. Would it be more ethical to reduce pollution without worrying about the cost or by taking the cost into account? Briefly explain.

What is absolute advantage? What is comparative advantage? Is it possible for a country to have a comparative advantage in producing a good without also having an absolute advantage? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free