In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and his other books about the Land of
\(\mathrm{Oz}, \mathrm{L}\). Frank Baum observed that if people's wants were
limited enough, most goods would not be scarce. According to Baum, this was
the case in Oz:
There were no poor people in the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}\), because there was no
such thing as money.... Each person was given freely by his neighbors whatever
he required for his use, which is as much as anyone may reasonably desire.
Some tilled the lands and raised great crops of grain, which was divided
equally among the whole population, so that all had enough. There were many
tailors and dressmakers and shoemakers and the like, who made things that any
who desired them might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments
for the person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments
also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no matter what
he or she produced for the good of the community, was supplied by the
neighbors with food and clothing and a house and furniture and ornaments and
games. If by chance the supply ever ran short, more was taken from the great
storehouses of the Ruler, which were afterward filled up again when there was
more of any article than people needed.... You will know, by what I have told
you here, that the Land of Oz was a remarkable country. I do not suppose such
an arrangement would be practical with us. Briefly explain whether you agree
with Baum that the economic system in Oz wouldn't work in the contemporary
United States.