Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In colonial America, the population was spread thinly over a large area, and transportation costs were very high because it was difficult to ship products by road for more than short distances. As a result, most of the free population lived on small farms, where people not only grew their own food but also usually made their own clothes and very rarely bought or sold anything for money. Explain why the incomes of these farmers were likely to rise as transportation costs fell. Use the concept of comparative advantage in your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The incomes of farmers in colonial America were likely to rise as transportation costs fell due to the principle of comparative advantage. Lower transportation costs allowed farmers to trade goods they could produce more efficiently or abundantly, increasing their productivity and income.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the situation

In colonial America, the high costs of transportation limited the ability of people to trade goods over long distances. Most people lived on small farms and were largely self-sufficient, creating their own food and clothing, and very rarely traded anything for money.
02

Defining comparative advantage

Comparative advantage is an economic concept that suggests that all entities, regardless of their level of productivity, can engage in mutually beneficial trade. They do this by focusing on tasks they can perform most efficiently.
03

Applying comparative advantage to the situation

If transportation costs were to fall, farmers could potentially benefit from trading goods they can produce relatively more efficiently or abundantly than their potential trading partners.
04

Linking reduced transportation costs to higher incomes

Lower transportation costs make it economically feasible to trade goods over greater distances. This allows the farmers to exploit their comparative advantage, specialize in the production of certain goods, and trade the surplus for other needed goods. By doing so, they can increase their overall productivity and, subsequently, their income.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Transportation Costs
In colonial America, the costs associated with moving goods from one place to another were quite high. This was mainly due to the lack of proper roads and transportation methods. People primarily relied on basic pathways that weren't well-suited for carrying heavy loads over long distances. As a result, transporting goods was a time-consuming and expensive process.

High transportation costs led to each family needing to produce most of what they consumed. This isolation limited their ability to trade or sell products outside their immediate area. Consequently, the local economy remained somewhat stagnant. However, if transportation costs were reduced, it would allow for more efficient trade. This means that goods could be moved to different markets at a lower cost, making trade possible even over longer distances.

Reducing transportation costs could allow farmers to sell their surplus products to market centers where there was more demand, which could help boost their incomes.
Colonial America
During colonial times, America was largely rural and agricultural. Most people lived on farms spread out across vast distances. Life in these times was primarily self-sufficient, as communities were isolated and had limited access to goods from elsewhere. People would grow food, raise livestock, and make their own clothing and tools.

Due to this self-reliant lifestyle, there was limited trade and economic interaction among different areas. Farms operated as individual units that aimed to meet all of their own needs. Communities operated in a closed-loop where everything required was produced locally. However, as communities started to connect more through improved transportation, colonial farmers started seeing an opportunity to engage with broader markets. This transformation helped shift communities from strictly self-sufficient endeavors to participating in a wider economic network.
Self-Sufficiency
Self-sufficiency was a core way of life in colonial America. Due to high transportation costs and limited infrastructure, families on farms had to rely on their own efforts for most of their needs. Farms acted almost as complete systems where food, clothing, and other essentials were produced from scratch.

Self-sufficiency means being able to provide all necessary things without outside help. This model limits the scope for specialization, where individuals or communities produce only what they are best at creating. As a result, everything from basic goods to complex products had to be crafted locally. Nonetheless, self-sufficiency was vital when communities couldn't easily import goods from other areas.

However, as trade routes expanded and costs lowered, the need for self-sufficiency decreased. This offered an opportunity for farmers to specialize in certain crops or goods in which they had a comparative advantage, allowing them to trade for other items and gradually improve their standard of living.
Economic Concepts
Economic concepts like comparative advantage and opportunity cost play a crucial role in understanding how a reduction in transportation costs can affect communities. Comparative advantage suggests that individuals or groups should focus on producing goods where they have a relative efficiency compared to others.

In the context of colonial American farmers, when transportation became cheaper and more accessible, it allowed them to specialize based on their strengths rather than attempt to do everything by themselves. By focusing on tasks they were better at producing, they could trade their surplus for goods they weren't able to make as efficiently.

This system encourages specialization and trade, increasing overall productivity and economic welfare. Opportunity cost, another vital concept, refers to the potential gain lost when choosing one option over another. Farmers in colonial America faced opportunity costs every time they had to choose between producing two different kinds of goods. By specializing based on comparative advantage, they could maximize their productivity and income, paving the way for economic growth.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If Nicaragua can produce with the same amount of resources twice as much coffee as Colombia, explain how Colombia could have a comparative advantage in producing coffee.

Imagine that the next time the New England Patriots play the Miami Dolphins at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, Patriots star quarterback Tom Brady has a temporary lack of judgment and plans to sell Patriots memorabilia during the game because he realizes that he can sell five times more Patriots products than anyone in the stadium sports gear store. Likewise, imagine that you are a creative and effective manager at work and that you tell your employees that during the next six months, you plan to clean the offices because you can clean five times better than the cleaning staff. What error in judgment are both you and Tom making? Why shouldn't you and Tom do what you are better than anyone else at doing?

The chapter mentions that in 1965 , married women with children did an average of 32 hours of housework per week, while men did an average of only 4 hours of housework - a total of 36 hours of housework. In \(2016,\) the estimated average weekly hours of housework for women declined to 15.7 while the hours worked by men increased to about 9.7 - a total of 25.4 hours of housework. Does the decrease in the total number of hours of housework- from 36 to 25.4 mean that families are willing to live in messier homes? Briefly explain.

In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and his other books about the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}, \mathrm{L}\). Frank Baum observed that if people's wants were limited enough, most goods would not be scarce. According to Baum, this was the case in Oz: There were no poor people in the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}\), because there was no such thing as money.... Each person was given freely by his neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as anyone may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops of grain, which was divided equally among the whole population, so that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than people needed.... You will know, by what I have told you here, that the Land of Oz was a remarkable country. I do not suppose such an arrangement would be practical with us. Briefly explain whether you agree with Baum that the economic system in Oz wouldn't work in the contemporary United States.

What is the basis for trade: absolute advantage or comparative advantage? How can an individual or a country gain from specialization and trade?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free