Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What do economists mean by scarcity? Can you think of anything that is not scarce according to the economic definition?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Scarcity is the economic concept of having unlimited human wants and needs but limited resources to fulfill them. An example of something that is not considered scarce according to this definition would be air or natural light.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Scarcity

Scarcity, in the field of economics, refers to the basic economic problem of having seemingly unlimited human wants and needs in a world of limited resources. It essentially states that there is a finite amount of resources, including time, money and labor, which are insufficient to satisfy all human wants and needs.
02

Application of Concept

Applying this concept, one can argue that resources such as air or natural light are not considered scarce from the economic perspective since they are available in abundance and are not limited.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scarcity in Economics
At the heart of economics is a concept known as scarcity. It's a simple yet profound idea that there aren't enough resources in the world to fulfill every single one of our desires. The definition of scarcity stretches across money, resources, and even time. Few aspects of our lives escape this fundamental truth. For instance, consider a student with a fixed amount of money but a desire to purchase books, games, and gadgets. The student must make a choice, which is essentially the act of prioritizing one want over another due to limited funds.

When we assess resources like air or sunlight, traditional concepts of scarcity don't generally apply. These are abundant resources, available without the need for human production. However, it's worth noting that even these resources can become scarce in certain contexts. For example, clean air can be scarce in polluted areas, bringing to light that the concept of scarcity isn't entirely black and white and often hinges on context and perspective.
Unlimited Wants and Limited Resources
The dance between our unlimited wants and the limited resources available to satisfy those wants is a core theme in economics. Humans inherently desire a wide array of goods and services that extend beyond the necessities for survival. These wants are ever-growing and changing, influenced by factors like marketing, culture, and technology. On the flip side, Earth's resources – such as minerals, oil, and arable land – are not infinite. Even human-generated resources like money and labor are bound by limitations.

Our society is fundamentally built on the concept of trade-offs due to this imbalance. Providing a relatable example helps students understand this concept better, like the concept of budgeting in personal finance. When budgeting, individuals must allocate their finite income towards a multitude of expenses, making decisions based on priorities and resource constraints. Such practical examples make the abstract idea of unlimited wants and limited resources more tangible.
The Basic Economic Problem
The basic economic problem arises directly from the tug of war between our limitless desires and the finite resources our planet offers. It prompts the crucial economic questions of what to produce, how to produce, and for whom to produce. As a result, societies and individuals are faced with the challenge of decision-making and prioritization.

For instance, a government may need to decide whether to invest more in healthcare or education, while a company might grapple with allocating funds between research and development or marketing. These decisions stem from the issue of scarcity and the basic economic problem. Explaining this through real-world dilemmas can significantly help students connect with the material.
  • What goods and services should be produced?
  • How should these goods and services be produced efficiently?
  • Who will receive the goods and services produced?
These questions guide economic policies and individual choices, highlighting the pervasive nature of the basic economic problem in organizing societies and their resources.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Lawrence Summers served as secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration and as director of the National Economic Council in the Obama administration. He has been quoted as giving the following defense of the economic approach to policy issues: There is nothing morally unattractive about saying: We need to analyze which way of spending money on health care will produce more benefit and which less, and using our money as efficiently as we can. I don't think there is anything immoral about seeking to achieve environmental benefits at the lowest possible costs. Would it be more ethical to reduce pollution without worrying about the cost or by taking the cost into account? Briefly explain.

An economist remarked that "the cost of consuming a book is the combination of the retail price and the opportunity cost of the time spent reading." Isn't the cost of consuming a book just the price you pay to buy the book? Why include the cost of the time spent reading the book in the cost of consuming the book?

In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and his other books about the Land of Oz,L. Frank Baum observed that if people's wants were limited enough, most goods would not be scarce. According to Baum, this was the case in Oz: There were no poor people in the Land of Oz, because there was no such thing as money.... Each person was given freely by his neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as anyone may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops of grain, which was divided equally among the whole population, so that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than people needed.... You will know, by what I have told you here, that the Land of Oz was a remarkable country. I do not suppose such an arrangement would be practical with us. Briefly explain whether you agree with Baum that the economic system in Oz wouldn't work in the contemporary United States.

The chapter mentions that in 1965 , married women with children did an average of 32 hours of housework per week, while men did an average of only 4 hours of housework - a total of 36 hours of housework. In 2016, the estimated average weekly hours of housework for women declined to 15.7 while the hours worked by men increased to about 9.7 - a total of 25.4 hours of housework. Does the decrease in the total number of hours of housework- from 36 to 25.4 mean that families are willing to live in messier homes? Briefly explain.

A columnist for Forbes argues, "Even if China is always better than Spain at producing textiles, if the best thing that Spain could be doing is textiles, then that's what Spain should be doing." a. What does the columnist mean by "China is always better than Spain" in producing textiles (which include clothing, sheets, and similar products)? Was the columnist arguing that China has an absolute advantage over Spain in producing textiles, a comparative advantage, or both? Briefly explain. b. The columnist noted that, in fact, Spain exports significant quantities of textiles. If his description of the situation in China and Spain is accurate, briefly explain how Spanish firms are able to export textiles in competition with Chinese firms.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free