Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(Related to the Chapter Opener on page 600 ) In 2017 , the Trump administration proposed changes to the federal tax code, including reducing the top corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent. An article in the Wall Street Journal noted, "A tax overhaul could give companies more incentive to invest." a. What type of investments is the article referring to? Why would cutting the corporate income tax rate lead companies to engage in more investment? b. Some policymakers and economists are critical of cuts in the corporate income tax rate because they argue that such cuts increase income inequality. Does the incidence of the corporate income tax matter in evaluating this argument? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The article refers to capital investments - new equipment, buildings, machinery, research and development or other productive assets. Reduced corporate income tax rates lead to more investment by increasing the post-tax return on investments, thereby making more projects economically viable. Whether cuts in the corporate income tax rate increase income inequality depends on the incidence of the tax. If the burden of the tax falls predominantly on wealthier shareholders, a tax cut could increase income inequality, as these individuals retain a larger share of the profits.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Investments and Tax Influence

The major types of investments companies typically participate in are capital investments. These typically include new equipment, buildings, machinery, research and development or other operating inputs necessary to increase productivity. When the corporate income tax rate is reduced, companies retain more of their earnings. They can utilize these additional funds in a way that brings about a higher return than the cost of capital, such as stimulating growth through capital investments.
02

Discuss Tax Incidence and Income Inequality

The incidence of a tax refers to who ultimately bears the burden of the tax. While companies are directly responsible to pay the corporate income tax, the incidence of the tax can fall on various stakeholders such as the company, its employees, its customers, or even its shareholders. If the tax incidence falls predominantly on the shareholders (who are typically wealthier individuals), a reduction in such tax rates might allow these individuals to retain a larger share of profits, thereby potentially exacerbating income inequality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Capital Investments
When we talk about capital investments, we're referring to the significant amounts of money that companies put into long-term assets. These might include purchasing new machinery, building new facilities, upgrading technology, or investing in research and development. Capital investments are crucial for businesses because they enable growth and expansion, eventually leading to increased productivity and efficiency.

The corporate income tax rate can influence capital investments directly. If the tax rate is lowered, companies are left with more after-tax income. With additional funds available, businesses often choose to invest in capital assets. These investments improve their operational capabilities, potentially leading to higher profits in the long run. Lower taxes increase the return on investment (ROI), making such capital ventures more attractive to companies.
Tax Incidence
Tax incidence deals with understanding who bears the real burden of a tax. It's a frequent point of discussion in economic policies. While corporations might seem like the direct payers of corporate income tax, the true impact spreads across various groups.

Here's how it works:
  • Shareholders: If companies pay less tax, shareholders might enjoy higher dividends or increased stock value.
  • Employees: More available capital might also mean higher wages or better facilities for workers.
  • Customers: Sometimes companies pass tax savings onto consumers through lower prices.
Understanding who truly shoulders the tax helps evaluate any economic policy's broader impact on society.
Income Inequality
Income inequality is the disparity in income distribution among people in a society. It's a hot topic because it affects economic stability and social fairness. When corporate taxes are cut, it might seem like a positive development for companies, but its influence on income inequality can be significant.

If the primary beneficiaries of tax cuts are the wealthier shareholders, the disparity between high and low-income individuals may increase. This is because wealthier individuals gain more from returns on investments or as part of corporate earnings, while lower-income groups do not experience the same benefit.

The distribution of income is a key consideration for any policy involving tax rates. Evaluating the implications on inequality helps in designing fairer tax systems.
Corporate Tax Rate
The corporate tax rate is the percentage that corporations pay on their profits. It's an essential part of any country's tax policy because it affects business profitability, investment decisions, and economic growth.

By reducing corporate tax rates, governments aim to stimulate investment by leaving more money in the hands of businesses. This can lead to increased hiring, better wages, or expansion projects, potentially boosting the overall economy.

However, policymakers must balance these rates to ensure the government still collects sufficient revenue for public services. It's a delicate play between encouraging business growth and meeting public financial needs.
Economic Incentives
Economic incentives are tools used to motivate and encourage individuals and businesses to pursue certain economic activities. They can be in the form of tax breaks, subsidies, or grants. In the context of tax policy, lowering the corporate tax rate acts as an incentive.

This incentive can lead companies to increase investments, boost productivity, and expand their workforce. By knowing they will pay less tax, companies might find new projects more feasible, which they previously couldn't afford.

The ultimate goal of offering economic incentives is to foster an environment where businesses can flourish, leading to a healthier national economy. This growth results from strategic policy-making aiming to align corporate interests with broader economic goals.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many political observers have noted that Republican presidential candidates tend to emphasize their conservative positions on policy issues while running for their party's nomination, and Democratic presidential candidates tend to emphasize their liberal positions on policy issues while running for their party's nomination. In the general election, though, Republican candidates tend to downplay their conservative positions, and Democratic candidates tend to downplay their liberal positions. Can the median voter theorem help explain this pattern? Briefly explain.

What is the difference between a progressive tax and a regressive tax? Give an example of each.

Suppose that a country has 20 million households. Ten million are poor households that each have labor market earnings of \(\$ 20,000\) per year, and 10 million are rich households that each have labor market earnings of \(\$ 80,000\) per year. If the government enacted a marginal \(\operatorname{tax}\) of 10 percent on all labor market earnings above \(\$ 20,000\) and transferred this money to households earning \(\$ 20,000\), would the incomes of the poor rise by \(\$ 6,000\) per year? Briefly explain.

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following argument: The median voter theorem will be an accurate predictor of the outcomes of elections when a majority of voters have preferences very similar to those of the median voter. When the majority of voters have preferences very different from those of the median voter, the median voter theorem will not lead to accurate predictions of the outcomes of elections.

An article in the Economist on the work of the late Nobel Laureate James Buchanan made the following observation: "It was important...to understand the ways that government could fail systematically." a. What does government failure mean in this context? How does public choice theory help us understand how "government could fail systematically"? b. The same article noted that "rent-seeking is a very useful concept to have around when thinking about policy." What is rent seeking? Why is the concept useful when thinking about policy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free