Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Robert Hall of Stanford University and Nicholas PetroskyNadeau of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco used the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to divide households into four income levels, or quartiles. They found that in \(2013,\) households in the lowest quartile earned 62 percent of their income from working, while households in the highest quartile earned 96 percent of their income from working. What might explain the difference in the percentage of income earned by working between these two groups? Is your

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference in the percentage of income earned by working between these two groups can be attributed to differences in types of employment, wage levels, and access to other income sources. Higher quartile households tend to have higher paying jobs and may have more varied income sources. Lower quartile households may rely more on non-work income like government benefits or pensions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Income Distribution

An understanding of what income quartiles mean is a prerequisite. Households are divided into four groups based on income levels: lowest, lower-middle, upper-middle, and highest. The demographic and working profile for each quartile may be unique.
02

Analyze the Data Provided

In 2013, households in the lowest quartile earned 62% of their income from working while households in the highest quartile earned 96% of their income from working. Higher working income in the highest quartile indicates a correlation between the amount of income earned from work and the total income.
03

Investigate Potential Causes

One major factor could be the types of jobs and wages in each quartile. High quartile households might be earning more from work because they are employed in high paying jobs. Additionally, high-income households may have more available resources and opportunities to earn from divers sources (not solely reliant on wages). Lower quartile households may have a larger proportion of their income from governmental benefits, pensions or other non-work income sources.
04

Draw Conclusion

Given the data and a basic understanding of income distribution and employment types, it could be inferred that the divergence in percent of incomes earned from working between different household income quartiles can be attributed to the disparity in job types, wages, and access to alternate income sources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Income Quartiles
Income quartiles are a statistical tool used in economics to divide the population into four equal groups based on household income. This analysis helps to illustrate the distribution of income within a society. Quartiles rank from the lowest (first quartile) to the highest (fourth quartile) income earners.

Understanding income quartiles is crucial because they reveal much about the economic state of different social groups. For instance, they show which segment of the population is earning the most or the least, and this can be indicative of broader economic trends such as inequality or economic mobility.

An in-depth look at these quartiles often includes examining factors like employment rates, education levels, and demographic trends within each group. Such analysis can lead to policy developments aimed at addressing disparities in income distribution.
Household Income Analysis
Household income analysis delves into the earnings and resources available to a household. Analysis efforts often include reviewing the various sources of income such as wages from employment, investments, government assistance, and pensions.

Analysts look at not just the amount of income, but also its composition. For example, higher-income households might have a greater share of their income from investments, whereas lower-income households may rely more on work income or government benefits. By understanding the breakdown, economists can gain insights into the financial health and stability of different households.

Household income analysis is foundational in crafting economic policies that aim to improve the well-being of citizens, reduce poverty, and address income inequality. It's a critical tool for determining where financial assistance and social programs are needed most.
Employment and Wages Correlation
The correlation between employment and wages is a fundamental concept in labor economics. This relationship posits that as employment increases, particularly in high-skilled jobs, average wages tend to rise. Conversely, a higher unemployment rate can drive wages down due to increased competition for jobs.

Factors influencing this correlation include educational attainment, industry demand, and the overall economic climate. High-income households often secure better-paying jobs due to higher education levels and professional experience. This not only impacts their immediate earnings but also their long-term wealth accumulation.

Analyzing the connection between employment and wages helps in understanding income disparities between different groups. It can guide policymakers in creating employment opportunities, educational programs, and wage standards that work towards economic equity and growth.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is a Lorenz curve? What is a Gini coefficient? If a country had a Gini coefficient of 0.48 in 1960 and 0.44 in 2018 , would income inequality in the country have increased or decreased?

What does tax incidence mean?

What is the difference between a progressive tax and a regressive tax? Give an example of each.

What is rent seeking, and how is it related to regulatory capture?

Cecil Bohanon, an economist at Ball State University, and Brian Pizzola, an economist with the accounting firm Ernst \& Young, used a proposed tax on income earned by credit card lenders in Minnesota to explain how tax incidence is determined. The tax, which state lawmakers did not pass, would have been imposed on lenders who charged credit card customers more than 15 percent interest on their balances. Bohanon and Pizzola explained that many of those who paid high interest rates were consumers with fewer other sources of credit, and there was nothing to prevent lenders from further raising interest rates after the tax was imposed. John Spry, an economist at St. Thomas University, stated that the proposed tax was "highly regressive \(\ldots\) twenty percent of the new tax would be paid by Minnesota families with the lowest 10 percent of income. Thirty-seven percent of the tax would be paid by families with the lowest 20 percent of income." a. Explain why John Spry believed that the proposed tax would have been "highly regressive." b. Do Bohanon and Pizzola believe the elasticity of demand of those who would have been most affected by the tax was more or less elastic than the elasticity of supply of credit card lenders? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free