Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Prices for many goods are higher in the city of Shenzhen on the mainland of China than in the city of Hong Kong. An article in the Economist noted that "individuals can arbitrage these differences through what effectively amounts to smuggling." a. Explain what the article means when it notes that individuals can "arbitrage these price differences." b. Ultimately, what would you expect the result to be of individuals engaging in this arbitrage? Is your answer affected by the fact that the government of China requires a visa for Shenzhen residents to visit Hong Kong and regulates the number of trips that can be made between the two cities in a given year? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Arbitrage in this context means purchasing goods in Hong Kong where they’re cheaper and selling them in Shenzhen at a higher price, thus profiting from the price difference. This action over time tends to balance out prices in disparate markets. While regulations such as visa requirements and limitations on travel may slow down the speed of this price harmonization, they don’t eliminate the opportunity for arbitrage completely unless the costs overshadow potential profits.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Price Arbitrage

Arbitrage in economic context means the simultaneous buying and selling of the same goods or securities in different markets to take advantage of price differences. When the article mentions that individuals can 'arbitrage these price differences', it means that people can buy goods in Hong Kong where prices are lower and sell them in Shenzhen where prices are higher, thus making a profit from the price disparity.
02

Possible Outcomes of Arbitrage

In Economics, arbitrage plays a crucial role in ensuring that prices do not deviate substantially from fair value for long periods of time. With many individuals taking part in this arbitrage, over time the prices in Shenzhen and Hong Kong should start to converge. This is due to the increased demand for goods in Hong Kong driving up prices, and the increased supply of those same goods in Shenzhen driving down prices.
03

Effect of Government Regulations

The requirement of visa for Shenzhen's residents to visit Hong Kong, along with the regulation of the number of trips that can be made, may slow down or restrict the arbitrage activity. Due to these restrictions, the frequency and quantity of goods being transported for arbitrage could be limited, thus slowing the speed at which price convergence would occur. Yet, these restrictions do not eliminate the opportunity for arbitrage, unless the cost associated with obtaining a visa and the limitation on travel exceed the potential profit from arbitrage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Price Disparity
Price disparity occurs when the price of a particular good or service differs between two different markets. In the case of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, goods can have different price tags due to a variety of factors such as:
  • Supply and Demand: If a product is scarce in Shenzhen but abundant in Hong Kong, it is natural for the product to be more expensive in Shenzhen.
  • Transport Costs: Moving goods between these cities incurs costs, influencing final prices.
  • Taxes and Tariffs: Different tax and duty structures can lead to price differences as well.
When price disparity exists, it presents an opportunity for buying in the cheaper market and selling in the costlier one to make a profit. This exploitation of price differences is known as price arbitrage, a crucial mechanism in aligning price imbalances across markets.
Market Regulation
Market regulation refers to the actions by a governing body to control or influence the market's actions often to ensure fairness, competition, and efficiency. In the context of the movement of goods between Shenzhen and Hong Kong:
  • Visa Requirements: The Chinese government's need for visas and regulation of the number of trips Shenzhen residents make to Hong Kong is a form of market regulation. This limits the ease with which arbitrage can occur, potentially stabilizing disruptive economic activities.
  • Trade Policies: By setting these limits, governments can theoretically protect local markets or stabilize economic outcomes.
Market regulation impacts how quickly or effectively arbitrage can balance prices. Too stringent regulations might hinder the natural market processes of price adjustment.
Economic Outcomes
Economic outcomes are the changes within the economy resulting from specific activities, like arbitrage. Potential economic outcomes of arbitrage between Shenzhen and Hong Kong include:
  • Price Convergence: Products in Shenzhen may gradually decrease in price, while prices in Hong Kong might increase due to shifting supply and demand dynamics.
  • Efficiency Enhancements: Through arbitrage, resources are allocated more efficiently as price disparities narrow, potentially leading to improved economic welfare.
  • Regulatory Impact: If regulations are overly restrictive, the anticipated outcome of price convergence might be delayed or minimized, affecting overall market efficiency.
Although arbitrage can foster beneficial economic outcomes, it is essential that it operates within a balanced regulatory framework to ensure these benefits are not undermined by too much market control.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

During the nineteenth century, the U.S. Congress encouraged railroad companies to build transcontinental railways across the Great Plains by giving them land grants. At that time, the federal government owned most of the land on the Great Plains. The land grants consisted of the land on which the railway was built and alternating sections of 1 square mile each on either side of the railway to a distance of 6 to 40 miles, depending on the location. The railroad companies were free to sell this land to farmers or anyone else who wanted to buy it. The process of selling the land took decades. Some economic historians have argued that the railroad companies charged lower prices to ship freight because they owned so much land along the tracks. Briefly explain the reasoning of these economic historians.

Does a product always have to sell for the same price everywhere? Briefly explain.

The Danish firm a2i Systems A/S sells software that helps service stations implement dynamic pricing strategies for gasoline sales. Service stations that use the software typically offer lower prices in the morning than in the afternoon and even raise prices when competing stations with very low prices have long lines. In an article in the Wall Street Journal, the firm's CEO noted, "This is not a matter of stealing more money from your customer. It's about making margin on people who don't care, and giving away margin to people who do care." a. What does the CEO mean by "margin"? b. Briefly explain how these pricing strategies "make margin" on customers who don't care and "give away margin" on customers who do care.

What is the law of one price? What is arbitrage?

Lexmark charges lower prices for its printer cartridges in some foreign countries than it charges in the United States. An article in the Wall Street Journal explained how a company in West Virginia bought Lexmark printer cartridges from retailers in foreign countries and resold the cartridges for higher prices in the United States. a. What must Lexmark be assuming about the price elasticity of demand for printer cartridges in the United States relative to the price elasticity of demand for printer cartridges in these foreign countries? b. Is Lexmark likely to be able to continue to price discriminating in this way? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free