Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An article in the Wall Street Journal, discussing large hightech firms such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, stated, "Today's high-tech giants may not be monopolies in the most classic sense.... [Demand] for technology products and services keeps increasing.... That leaves a lot of potential upside for a small group of big players that already have demonstrated that scale matters." a. Why would high-technology firms not be considered monopolies in the "classic sense"? b. Why would the article state that for the most profitable high-technology firms, "scale matters"?

Short Answer

Expert verified
High-technology firms do not fit into the 'classic' definition of a monopoly as they operate in an oligopoly rather than having absolute control over the market like a monopolist. Although they own large portions of their respective markets and have significant influences, there are other competitors in the market offering similar products and services. As for the statement that 'scale matters' for these firms, it refers to the principle of economies of scale. As these companies are able to scale their services to a large number of users without a significant increase in cost, they are able to achieve larger profit margins.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Monopolies in the Classic Sense

In the classic sense, a monopoly is defined as a market structure characterized by a single seller, selling a unique product with no close substitutes. In this market structure, the monopolist has full control over the market price by adjusting the quantity supplied. However, while large tech firms like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft occupy substantial portions of their respective markets, they are not the sole providers. There are other companies providing similar services and products, making the market not a pure monopoly but oligopolistic in nature.
02

Understanding Why Scale Matters

Scale in the context of a business typically refers to the concept of economies of scale, which means that as a company grows and production levels increase, the cost of producing each unit decreases. This is particularly true in the high-tech industry. Once the infrastructure and platforms are developed, companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft can add new users or sell additional units with relatively low costs. This increasing return to scale allows them to deliver more value to consumers and capture a larger portion of the market, thereby leading to higher profit margins.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Monopoly
A monopoly refers to a market structure where only one company dominates the entire market sector. This entity becomes the sole supplier, offering a unique product that has no close substitutes, thus controlling the market price due to the absence of competition. The control a monopolist has allows it to adjust prices to maximize profits.

However, even if some tech firms like Amazon, Microsoft, or Google hold significant power and market share, they aren’t monopolies in the "classic sense." Why? Because other companies do exist and compete in the same tech space. They offer similar products and services, meaning these tech giants don’t have exclusive control. In essence, they operate in what is more accurately described as an oligopoly.

In essence, while these companies hold large portions of their respective markets, the competitive presence of other firms prevents them from being true monopolies. Their influence is substantial, but not exclusive.
Oligopoly
Oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a few firms holding the majority of the market share. These firms are conscious of each other's actions, often leading to strategic decision-making to maintain or increase market advantage.

In a high-tech environment, companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft operate in an oligopolistic market. They each have substantial control but still face significant competition from each other and other smaller firms. This influences how prices are set and how products are developed, pushing firms to innovate while considering rivals' moves.

The competition is fierce, yet the market still allows few players to dominate due to high entry barriers and resource requirements. This balance of power enables few competitors to coexist, often benefiting from similar strategies, such as investing in technology and expanding product lines.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale occur when a company reduces its per-unit costs as its production increases. High-tech firms experience these economies because they can spread their fixed costs over a larger number of items, significantly reducing the cost per unit.

For these firms, once they have set up the necessary infrastructure, like data centers or software development, adding extra customers doesn't increase costs too much. For example, Amazon can sell an additional book or connect another user to its web services for next to nothing compared to its initial investment.

The phrase "scale matters" directly relates to these principles. As tech giants grow, they can offer products at lower prices, further capturing market share and increasing their profitability. Thus, having a larger scale helps these firms stay competitive by lowering costs and increasing returns.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is "natural" about a natural monopoly?

In a magazine article, a writer explained that the provision of electric power in the United States consists of two processes: the generation of electricity and the distribution of electricity. The writer argued that "power distribution is a natural monopoly.... But ... there's \(\ldots\) no reason why the people who generate the electricity \(\ldots\) should be the same people who own the power lines." a. Why would the distribution of electric power be a natural monopoly? b. Why would the generation of electric power not be a natural monopoly?

Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the industry. In 2015 , these firms were attempting to merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one restaurant owner as saying, "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry \(\ldots\) when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development? c. Ultimately, the merger did not occur because the Federal Trade Commission was successful in suing to stop it. The judge who decided the case wrote, "The proposed merger of the country's first and second largest broadline foodservice distributors is likely to cause the type of industry concentration that Congress sought to curb at the outset before it harmed competition." Briefly explain what the judge meant by "industry concentration" and what the results will be of a merger that harms competition.

What are the four most important ways a firm becomes a monopoly?

An article in the New Yorker noted, "The Bronx [borough of New York City] is home to 1.5 million people, two hundred thousand public-school students, eleven colleges and universities, and a single general-interest bookstore a Barnes \& Noble, located in the Bay Plaza shopping center." The article also noted that this bookstore closed at the end of 2016 . Would the only bookstore in the Bronx, or any other city, be considered a monopoly? If so, why would it have closed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free