Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why market power leads to a deadweight loss. Is the total deadweight loss from market power for the economy large or small?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Market power leads to deadweight loss because it allows firms to set prices above marginal costs, thereby reducing the amount of trade that occurs and creating inefficiencies. Whether the total deadweight loss from market power is large or small for the economy is subjective and depends on several factors. In general, while it's present, one could argue it isn't typically large given the trade-offs involved.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Deadweight Loss

First, we need to understand deadweight loss. Deadweight loss represents inefficiencies in a market - situations where the allocation of goods and services is not optimal. In an ideal competitive market scenario, the price of a product is determined by the intersection of the supply and demand curve, which leads to economic efficiency. This is because the marginal cost (MC) equals the marginal benefit (MB), i.e., what consumers are willing to pay for the last unit is exactly equal to what it costs the producers to produce that last unit.
02

The Role of Market Power in Creating Deadweight Loss

When a firm holds substantial market power, such as a monopolistic firm, it can influence the price of the product or service, effectively breaking away from the ideal situation where price equals marginal cost (P=MC). Instead, the firm will increase the price (P) above the marginal cost (MC) to maximise their profit, leading to P>MC. In this situation, the quantity of goods produced and consumed is lower than the socially efficient level. This reduction of trade due to market power is what leads to the deadweight loss, as there will be consumers willing to pay more than the marginal cost of production who are nevertheless priced out of the market.
03

Assessing the Size of Deadweight Loss Due to Market Power

As for whether the deadweight loss from market power is large or small in an economy, this depends on several factors including the size and number of markets where firms have significant market power, the degree of their power, and the elasticities of supply and demand. Additionally, it's worth mentioning that while market power can lead to deadweight loss, it may also enable firms to invest in research and development. The act of balancing these facts may lead many to conclude that the overall deadweight loss from market power in the economy is present, but isn't generally large.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Deadweight Loss
Deadweight loss occurs when the allocation of resources in a market is not efficient. This means that the total benefits of trade, or the sum of consumer and producer surplus, are not maximized. In simpler terms, deadweight loss is the cost to society created by market inefficiencies.

In an ideal competitive market, prices adjust to match what's known as the equilibrium price, where supply meets demand. Here, every consumer willing to pay the marginal cost of a good, which is what it costs to produce one more unit, gets the good, and every producer willing to produce at that marginal cost can sell their product. However, market power disrupts this balance, causing deadweight loss. When companies price above marginal cost due to their market power, it results in consumers who otherwise would buy at a lower price being excluded from the market. This exclusion means that potentially beneficial trades can't occur, leading to a loss in total surplus for the economy.
Economic Efficiency
Economic efficiency is achieved when resources are allocated in a way that maximizes the total level of societal welfare. It's the zenith of perfect market functioning where every good or service is produced at the lowest possible cost and consumed by those who value it most.

In such a scenario, the market equilibrium reflects the point where marginal cost equals marginal benefit. However, when firms possess market power, they often price above their marginal cost, disrupting this equilibrium. This leads to a production level that is less than what would exist in a perfectly competitive scenario, thereby causing inefficiency. Despite this, the presence of some degree of market power may sometimes support innovation when firms have resources to invest in research and development.
Marginal Cost and Marginal Benefit
Marginal cost (MC) is the additional cost of producing one more unit of a good or service. Marginal benefit (MB), on the other hand, is the additional benefit received by consuming one more unit. In an efficient market, these two metrics are equal at the equilibrium point.

The equality between marginal cost and marginal benefit ensures that resources are allocated efficiently, as every unit produced is both a suitable cost to producers and a worthwhile expenditure to consumers. Firms with significant market power can alter this natural equilibrium by setting prices higher than the marginal cost. This means that the last unit consumed yields more benefit than it cost to produce, indicating a potential net benefit to society that's lost because the unit wasn't produced, highlighting a form of inefficiency that is aggravated by market power.
Monopoly Effects
Monopolies arise when a single firm dominates a market, giving it the power to affect prices significantly. This control over pricing is central to understanding how monopolies impact markets.

Typically, monopolies set prices higher than would be possible in a competitive market. They do this to maximize profits, but this comes at a societal cost. By increasing prices, they reduce the quantity of goods sold below the socially optimal level. As a result, some consumer demand is left unmet. This not only decreases consumer surplus but also causes a deadweight loss. Furthermore, monopolies may inhibit innovation and choice, as the lack of competition reduces the drive for improved products and services.
Market Inefficiencies
Market inefficiencies occur when resources are not used to their fullest potential, leading to a loss in economic welfare. Many factors can contribute to these inefficiencies, including market power, incomplete information, and externalities.

Market power, particularly when possessed by monopolies, is a primary source of inefficiency. By setting prices above the marginal cost and restricting output, these firms cause the market to operate below its optimal capacity. This limited supply leads to missed opportunities for welfare-enhancing trade.
  • Incomplete information, where consumers or producers lack critical knowledge, can further distort market outcomes.
  • Externalities, the costs or benefits not reflected in the market price, can cause additional inefficiencies.
Collectively, these factors reduce the total surplus available in the economy, highlighting the complexity of striving for market efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Wall Street Journal, discussing large hightech firms such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, stated, "Today's high-tech giants may not be monopolies in the most classic sense.... [Demand] for technology products and services keeps increasing.... That leaves a lot of potential upside for a small group of big players that already have demonstrated that scale matters." a. Why would high-technology firms not be considered monopolies in the "classic sense"? b. Why would the article state that for the most profitable high-technology firms, "scale matters"?

In China, the government owns many more firms than do governments in the United States. A former Chinese government official argued that a number of government-run industries such as oil refining were natural monopolies. Is it likely that oil refining is a natural monopoly? How would you be able to tell?

Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the industry. In 2015 , these firms were attempting to merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one restaurant owner as saying, "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry \(\ldots\) when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development? c. Ultimately, the merger did not occur because the Federal Trade Commission was successful in suing to stop it. The judge who decided the case wrote, "The proposed merger of the country's first and second largest broadline foodservice distributors is likely to cause the type of industry concentration that Congress sought to curb at the outset before it harmed competition." Briefly explain what the judge meant by "industry concentration" and what the results will be of a merger that harms competition.

What is "natural" about a natural monopoly?

What are the four most important ways a firm becomes a monopoly?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free