Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In China, the government owns many more firms than do governments in the United States. A former Chinese government official argued that a number of government-run industries such as oil refining were natural monopolies. Is it likely that oil refining is a natural monopoly? How would you be able to tell?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Oil refining could potentially be seen as a natural monopoly due to the high barriers to entry typically associated with it. However, without specific cost data, it's unclear whether economies of scale are present to the extent that would definitively qualify it as a natural monopoly.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Natural Monopoly

A natural monopoly occurs when, due to the unique characteristics of a particular industry, a single firm can serve an entire market at a lower cost than two or more firms would. The defining characteristics of a natural monopoly are high fixed costs, often due to large infrastructure investments that serve as high barriers to entry, and economies of scale that persist over the relevant range of output.
02

Applying the Criteria to Oil Refining

With an understanding of what constitutes a natural monopoly, the next step is to evaluate the oil refining industry on those terms. Significant investments in infrastructure are required for oil refining, presenting potentially high barriers to entry. Therefore, it's possible that given the high start-up costs, a single entity might be able to refine oil more cost-efficiently.
03

Assessing Economies of Scale in Oil Refining

Economies of scale refers to the cost benefits reaped by increasing output. In industries with high fixed costs, it can often be cheaper in terms of average cost per unit to generate more output. For the oil refining industry, this would mean examining whether refining more oil results in lower average costs.
04

Conclusion

To definitively conclude whether oil refining is a natural monopoly, access to specific data on costs of entry and economies of scale in the industry is necessary. However, given the high costs of entry, oil refining does present some characteristics of a natural monopoly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Economies of Scale
When we talk about economies of scale, we refer to the cost advantage that arises when there is an increased level of production.

In simple terms, the more a company produces, the lower the cost per unit tends to be. This happens because fixed costs (like rent or salaries) are spread out over more units of output.

For example, if an oil refinery initially invests in large and costly equipment, by producing a large volume of oil, these costs are distributed across more barrels. Thus, the average cost per barrel decreases.
  • Lower average cost with increased output.
  • Cost advantages from bulk purchasing and operational efficiencies.
  • Enhanced competitiveness in the market.
In the oil refining industry, economies of scale are significant. The extensive infrastructure and high initial costs mean that higher production levels can dramatically lower the average production cost. This characteristic suggests why, in specific contexts, single large-scale operators, such as government-run firms, might be more efficient than multiple smaller ones.
Barriers to Entry
Barriers to entry refer to the obstacles that make it difficult for new firms to enter an industry. In industries with significant barriers, new companies face challenges in competing with established firms.

In the context of oil refining, these barriers are often very high. Some of the notable barriers include:
  • High Startup Costs: Creating a new oil refinery requires a substantial initial investment in technology, equipment, and infrastructure.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent environmental and safety regulations require companies to invest in compliance, which is costly and time-consuming.
  • Market Dominance: Existing firms often have established relationships with suppliers and customers, making it tougher for new entrants to break into the market.
Such barriers mean that even if potential competitors are interested in entering the market, they may find it financially or logistically impractical. For oil refining, these high barriers contribute to the industry's potential status as a natural monopoly.
Fixed Costs
Fixed costs are the expenses that don't change with the amount of goods or services a company produces. They're "fixed" because they stay the same, regardless of output levels.

In oil refining, fixed costs are substantial, stemming from requirements like large processing plants, machinery, and other essential infrastructure.
  • Infrastructure Investments: Building refineries and purchasing equipment form a significant portion of these costs.
  • Maintenance and Upkeep: Continuous investment is needed to maintain facilities and ensure they operate efficiently.
  • Operational Staff Salaries: Pay for essential personnel remains constant, whether the refinery operates at full or reduced capacity.
Because fixed costs are so high, the cost per unit decreases as production increases, reinforcing the concept of economies of scale. For industries like oil refining, having a single or few producers can be cost-effective as these costs are more easily spread over a larger output, which ties back to why it might be a natural monopoly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Harvard Business School started using case studiesdescriptions of strategic problems encountered at real companies-in courses in 1912. Today, Harvard Business Publishing (HBP) sells its case studies to about 4,000 colleges worldwide. HBP is the sole publisher of Harvard Business School's case studies. What criteria would you use to determine whether HBP has a monopoly on the sale of business case studies to be used in college courses?

The German company Koenig \& Bauer has 90 percent of the world market for presses that print currency. Discuss the factors that would make it difficult for new companies to enter this market.

What is the relationship between a monopolist's demand curve and the market demand curve? What is the relationship between a monopolist's demand curve and its marginal revenue curve?

In 2016 , telecommunications company AT\&T reached an agreement to buy TimeWarner, which owns cable networks, magazines, and a film studio. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the CEOs of the two firms "played down concerns that the deal wouldn't get regulatory approval, again asserting that the deal is vertical in nature, rather than eliminating a competitor." a. What did the CEOs mean by saying that the merger was "vertical in nature"? b. Why would federal antitrust regulators be less likely to oppose a merger that was "vertical in nature" than one that eliminated a competitor? c. If the deal doesn't eliminate a competitor, what do the firms hope to gain from it?

Why would it be economically efficient to require a natural monopoly to charge a price equal to marginal cost? Why do most regulatory agencies require natural monopolies to charge a price equal to average cost instead?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free