Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 512) Why was De Beers worried that people might resell their old diamonds? How did De Beers attempt to convince consumers that previously owned diamonds were not good substitutes for new diamonds? How did De Beers's strategy affect the demand curve for new diamonds? How did De Beers's strategy affect its profit?

Short Answer

Expert verified
De Beers was worried about reselling old diamonds because they would provide a cheaper alternative and could reduce the demand and price for new diamonds. De Beers launched a marketing campaign to convince consumers that new diamonds were unique and shouldn't be resold. This perception shifted the demand curve for new diamonds, increasing their demand. Consequently, De Beers was able to maintain high prices and increase their profits.

Step by step solution

01

Reason for De Beers's concern

De Beers was concerned about the potential resale of old diamonds because they could become a cheaper alternative to newly mined diamonds. This would mean a readily available supply of diamonds that could lower the demand and price for new diamonds and affect De Beers' market control and profits.
02

De Beers's persuasion strategy

De Beers countered this by creating a marketing campaign that emphasized the sentimentality and uniqueness of new diamonds. They tried to convince consumers that unlike other commodities, diamonds were special, and once bought, should never be resold. They propagated the idea that previously owned diamonds were not as valuable or desirable as new ones. This campaign included the famous slogan 'A Diamond is Forever'.
03

Impact on demand curve for new diamonds

This strategy was successful in creating a negative perception of previously owned diamonds. This caused a shift in the demand curve for new diamonds as they were now seen as a separate, superior good rather than a substitute for old diamonds. This increased the demand for new diamonds.
04

Effect on De Beers's profit

As a result, De Beers was able to maintain high prices for new diamonds, even in the presence of potential substitutes. The increased demand and maintained high prices for new diamonds meant increased revenues and consequently, increased profit for De Beers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Diamond Resale Market
When it comes to the resale market for diamonds, it's crucial to understand its potential impact on major producers like De Beers. A thriving resale market could mean consumers purchase pre-owned diamonds instead of new ones, increasing the availability and decreasing the exclusivity of these gems. De Beers, historically, has been concerned about this because it directly affects their ability to control the market supply and diamond prices.

In response, De Beers strategically devalued the notion of buying second-hand diamonds by promoting the idea that each new diamond is unique and embodies a special connection between the giver and receiver. By underscoring the sentimental value and symbolic nature of diamonds, they effectively diminished the appeal of the resale market, maintaining the allure and demand for newly mined diamonds.
Demand Curve Effects
The demand curve in economics shows the relationship between price and quantity demanded of a good. De Beers’ marketing campaigns influenced the position of the demand curve for new diamonds by altering consumer perception.

By convincing buyers that new diamonds are vastly superior to previously owned ones, De Beers successfully shifted the demand curve to the right. This means at any given price level, more new diamonds were demanded than before, reaffirming De Beers' dominance in the industry. The rightward shift in the demand curve also illustrates a decrease in price elasticity for new diamonds, as consumers would be willing to pay higher prices under the belief that there are no close substitutes.
Branding of Luxury Goods
Branding is exceptionally powerful in the world of luxury goods. It turns ordinary products into symbols of status and desire. De Beers' branding efforts focused on instilling the notion that diamonds are not just luxury items, but the ultimate symbols of love and commitment.

Through slogans like 'A Diamond is Forever,' they created a brand story that resonated with deep emotional values, making the purchase of new diamonds an almost irreplaceable act. This form of branding goes beyond the physical attributes of the product and taps into the consumer's psyche, creating an association that's difficult for competitors to challenge and for the resale market to disrupt.
Economics of Supply and Demand
The principles of supply and demand are at the heart of the diamond industry's dynamics. De Beers' strategy affected these foundational economics by manipulating consumer demand. By successfully branding new diamonds as unique and irreplaceable, they curbed the growth of the diamond resale market and retained control over the supply of diamonds.

The impact on supply and demand goes beyond mere branding; it reshapes the entire market structure and positions a company like De Beers to maintain pricing power and market share. High demand for its product combined with the managed supply meant De Beers could maximize profits while preventing the typical market forces from driving prices down, demonstrating the power of marketing in influencing core economic principles.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the industry. In 2015 , these firms were attempting to merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one restaurant owner as saying, "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry \(\ldots\) when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development? c. Ultimately, the merger did not occur because the Federal Trade Commission was successful in suing to stop it. The judge who decided the case wrote, "The proposed merger of the country's first and second largest broadline foodservice distributors is likely to cause the type of industry concentration that Congress sought to curb at the outset before it harmed competition." Briefly explain what the judge meant by "industry concentration" and what the results will be of a merger that harms competition.

An article in the New Yorker noted, "The Bronx [borough of New York City] is home to 1.5 million people, two hundred thousand public-school students, eleven colleges and universities, and a single general-interest bookstore a Barnes \& Noble, located in the Bay Plaza shopping center." The article also noted that this bookstore closed at the end of 2016 . Would the only bookstore in the Bronx, or any other city, be considered a monopoly? If so, why would it have closed?

Does a monopolist have a supply curve? Briefly explain. (Hint: Look again at the definition of a supply curve in Chapter 3 on page 83 and consider whether this definition applies to a monopolist.)

What is a monopoly? Can a firm be a monopoly if close substitutes for its product exist?

In discussing the NCAA, the late Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, an economist, wrote, "It is impossible for an outsider to look at these [NCAA] rules without concluding that their main aim is to make the NCAA an effective cartel that severely constrains competition among schools for players." a. What is a cartel? In what ways does the NCAA act like a cartel? b. Who gains and who loses as a result of the NCAA acting like a cartel? If you are a student who does not play intercollegiate sports but who is enrolled at a school with prominent sports teams, such as the University of Alabama or Ohio State University, does the NCAA acting as a cartel make you better off or worse off? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free