Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 489) The U.S. Department of Justice investigated whether the four major U.S. airlines were colluding. Some analysts believed the airlines were restraining increases in capacity by failing to buy more planes or fly additional routes in order to reduce pressure to cut ticket prices. An airline industry analyst commented on the investigation, "I don't sense that the executives talk to each other. They actually hate each other, truth be told. But with so few of them left, there's almost a natural oligopoly." a. What does the analyst mean by "a natural oligopoly"? b. Would it be necessary for the airline executives to talk to each other to collude? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) In the given context, a natural oligopoly is an oligopoly that emerges due to market circumstances, not deliberate collusion, with a few major airlines dominating the industry. b) No, it isn't necessary for the airline executives to talk to each other to collude. They could engage in tacit collusion by observing each other's actions in the market and responding to them.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept of Natural Oligopoly

An oligopoly is a market situation where a small number of firms dominate the industry. The term 'natural oligopoly' means an oligopoly that emerges spontaneously due to market circumstances and not as a result of deliberate collusion or other artificial means. In this context, the analyst implies that there are few major airlines left in the US and this has naturally led to an oligopolistic market where each has significant market share.
02

Discussing the Necessity of Collusion

Collusion usually refers to a situation where companies in an industry conspire to fix prices, divide markets or engage in other anticompetitive activities to increase joint profits. While collusion generally involves communication and agreement among the firms, it isn't always necessary for the executives to directly talk to each other. They can observe each other's actions in the market and respond accordingly. This is sometimes referred to as 'tacit collusion'.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Oligopoly Market Structure
As we dive into the world of economics, we encounter various market structures that dramatically shape how businesses operate and compete. One such structure is the oligopoly market structure. In an oligopoly, a small number of large firms control the majority of the market share, which can significantly impact competition and consumer choice. Imagine a neighborhood with only a few supermarkets. Since options for grocery shopping are limited, each store doesn’t have to worry about a new competitor every day. Similarly, in an oligopoly, with few firms holding sway, each company's decisions can affect the entire market, leading to strategic business maneuvers.

It's important to distinguish between a few key characteristics of an oligopoly:
  • Interdependence: Companies' actions are closely tied to their competitor's moves. One firm's decision on pricing or production can prompt a reaction from the others.
  • Barriers to Entry: High entry barriers exist such as significant startup costs or strict regulations, making it hard for newcomers to disrupt the market balance.
  • Product Differentiation: While goods may be similar, firms often try to differentiate through branding, customer service, or minor product variances.
  • Non-Price Competition: Instead of competing on price, oligopolies may focus on advertising, product quality, and other factors to gain market share.
Given this interaction between oligopoly firms, the overall market dynamic becomes quite complex, creating a unique playing field for economics enthusiasts to study.
Collusion in Economics
Collusion in economics refers to the secret or illegal cooperation between rival firms, intending to deceive others to gain an unfair market advantage. Imagine two classmates secretly deciding to split topics for a group assignment so that each can do less work. This might benefit them, but it’s unfair to other groups. Similarly, in the business world, collusion typically involves activities like price-fixing, market sharing, and bid-rigging.

Collusion can take many forms:
  • Explicit Collusion: When companies openly agree on prices or production levels. Think of it as a secret club where members agree on the rules.
  • Tacit Collusion: This occurs without direct communication, where companies indirectly coordinate actions. It's like nodding to your friend across the room to signal you're ready to leave a boring party without saying a word.
  • Price Leadership: One prominent firm sets prices, and the others in the market follow suit. It's akin to following the lead dancer in a group performance - one wrong step, and the formation crumbles.
Understanding collusion is key because it directly affects market efficiency and consumer welfare. When firms collude, they can manipulate the market to their favor, which often leads to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.
Antitrust Policy
Antitrust policy is the government’s approach to ensuring fair competition among businesses. Imagine a game where one player makes all the rules to win - not much fun, right? Antitrust laws are like referees in this game, preventing players from having an unfair advantage. These rules encourage companies to compete honestly and vigorously, which in turn fosters innovation and provides consumers with the best combination of price and quality.

The objectives of antitrust policy include:
  • Preventing Monopolies: Discouraging single firms from controlling an entire market.
  • Promoting Competition: Encouraging companies to innovate and compete rather than collude.
  • Consumer Protection: Safeguarding interests by ensuring fair pricing and diverse product options.
Key tools of antitrust policy are legislation and enforcement actions. In the United States, for example, antitrust laws like the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act serve as the cornerstone of antitrust policy. Regulators such as the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have the power to investigate and act against anticompetitive practices. These agencies can levy substantial fines, dismantle monopolies, and block mergers that would limit competition. Understanding antitrust policy helps us comprehend the delicate balance of keeping markets healthy and protecting the spirit of competition.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Michael Porter has argued that "the intensity of competition in an industry is neither a matter of coincidence nor bad luck. Rather, competition in an industry is rooted in its underlying economic structure." What does Porter mean by "economic structure"? What factors besides economic structure might be expected to determine the intensity of competition in an industry? Source: Michael Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press, \(1980,\) p. 3 .

Give brief definitions of the following concepts. a. Game theory b. Cooperative equilibrium c. Noncooperative equilibrium d. Dominant strategy e. Nash equilibrium f. Price leadership

Movie studios split ticket revenues with the owners of the movie theaters that show their films. When a movie is no longer being shown in theaters, theater owners earn nothing further from the film, but studios continue to earn revenue when the movie is available for home viewing on DVD, Blu-ray, streaming, and cable. Theater owners would prefer that the time between when a movie appears in theaters and when it becomes available for home viewing be as long as possible. Typically, movies are not available for home viewing for at least 90 days after they are first shown in theaters. An article in the Wall Street Journal in 2017 noted a possible change to this system: "Hollywood studios are preparing to upend decades of tradition by releasing movies at home less than 45 days after they debut on the big screen." The article went on to note, "Studio executives say they would prefer to reach a deal with theaters, one reason they have been reluctant to unilaterally announce a new policy." Typically, would you expect that the profits of movie studios are more at risk from the bargaining power of theaters, or would you expect that the profits of theaters are more at risk from the bargaining power of movie studios? Have streaming and other online ways of watching movies changed the relative bargaining power of movie studios and theater owners? Briefly explain.

An economist argues that with respect to advertising in some industries, "gains to advertising firms are matched by losses to competitors" in the industry. Briefly explain the economist's reasoning. If his reasoning is correct, why do firms in these industries advertise?

Does the strength of each of the five competitive forces remain constant over time? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free