Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In 2017, Best Buy had the following price matching policy posted to its Web site: At the time of sale, we price match all local retail competitors (including their online prices) and we price match products shipped from and sold by these major online retailers: Amazon.com, Bhphotovideo.com, Crutchfield.com, Dell.com, HP.com, Newegg.com, and TigerDirect.com. Is Best Buy's policy likely to result in lower prices or higher prices on televisions and other products it sells in competition with Amazon and local brick-and-mortar stores? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Best Buy's price matching policy is likely to result in lower prices on televisions and other products it sells. The reason being, the policy ensures that their products are never priced higher than that of their competitors including Amazon and local brick-and-mortar stores, thus pushing them to potentially reduce their prices. In this case, it becomes a competitive edge for Best Buy attracting customers seeking lower prices.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Price Matching Policy

Best Buy’s policy was stated as matching the price of any product that local retailers and seven major online retailers are selling at the time of sale. This implies that Best Buy would not sell its products at a higher price than its competitors, ensuring their products are competitively priced.
02

Interpreting the Effects of Best Buy's Policy

The policy is likely to result in lower prices for the products Best Buy sells. This is due to the fact that, in order to match the prices of local and online competition, Best Buy may need to reduce its prices. This mechanism would ensure that customers get the most affordable price available for their products.
03

Considering the Market Competition

In a highly competitive market where various retailers are selling similar products, firms often attempt to differentiate themselves through pricing strategies. With Best Buy's policy, it attempts to hold an edge over the competition by assuring consumers they will not need to pay more for a product than they would have to on other platforms.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Competition
The landscape of market competition is composed of businesses vying for consumer attention and loyalty through various means, including price, quality, service, and brand recognition. A competitive market is dynamic and can be quite aggressive, wherein companies must be strategic to retain their customer base and attract new buyers.

In the context of the Best Buy price matching policy, market competition influences the electronics retailer's tactics to remain relevant against its rivals. Best Buy's commitment to match competitors' prices, including those of prominent online retailers, is a direct response to consumer behavior tendencies to search for the best deals. Consumers have become savvy, often using the internet to compare prices before making a purchase. Therefore, retailers like Best Buy have to keep their pricing strategies flexible and responsive.

Such policies aim to remove price as a point of friction, ensuring that customers do not turn to another retailer based solely on a cheaper cost. This makes the market more efficient as prices tend to reflect accurate market value of products, shaped by the supply and demand equilibrium.
Competitive Pricing Strategies
Competitive pricing strategies are crucial to any retailer's go-to-market plan and serve as a bridge between market competition and retail pricing. These strategies can include various methods such as price matching, discount pricing, penetration pricing, and more.

Price matching, as demonstrated by Best Buy, is a reactive approach where a retailer promises to match a competitor's price for an identical item. This strategy is consumer-friendly and can quickly establish trust and reliability. Businesses employing this strategy not only commit to offering fair prices but also display confidence in their services and additional value propositions.

However, competitive pricing goes beyond simple price matching. It includes understanding the price elasticity of products, analyzing competitor price points, determining optimal pricing thresholds, and even anticipating competitor promotions. For example, selling at a lower margin but in higher volumes might be more beneficial than a high-margin, low-volume approach, especially for consumer electronics which often have a short product lifecycle.
Retail Pricing
Retail pricing is the process by which retailers set the price at which they will sell their products to consumers. This is not an arbitrary decision; it is meticulously calculated using several factors. Cost of goods, overheads, market demand, competitor pricing, brand equity, and perceived value all play a role in determining the final retail price.

In a retail setting like Best Buy's, pricing must reflect more than just the cost of the item; it needs to incorporate the shopping experience, after-sales service, and any additional value that a retailer is providing. This can justify slight price differences from online-only marketplaces, which might not offer the same level of hands-on customer service.

By implementing a price matching policy, Best Buy signals to consumers that it values fairness in pricing while balancing the added expenses of running brick-and-mortar locations. Furthermore, such a policy ensures that the prices at Best Buy are competitive with online retail giants, thus offering customers a compelling reason to shop in-store without fear of overpaying. It's a strategic move that links retail pricing with overall market strategy, ideally resulting in a win-win situation for both retailer and consumer.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the Apple first launched Apple Music, singer Taylor Swift refused to allow her album \(1989,\) which had been the best-selling album of the year, to be made available for the service because Apple did not intend to pay royalties on songs it streamed during an initial three-month period when the service would be free to subscribers. In response, Apple changed its policy and agreed to pay royalties during those three months, even though doing so reduced its profit. Do singers typically have substantial bargaining power with Apple, Spotify, and the other streaming services? Briefly explain.

Under "early decision" college admission plans, students apply to a college in the fall and, if they are accepted, they must enroll in that college. Some critics of early decision plans, including some college presidents, argue that the plans put too much pressure on students to decide early in their senior year in high school which college to attend. Some college administrators have proposed abolishing early decision plans, but as a columnist in the New York Times noted, "It's more prevalent than ever, with some selective schools using it to fill upward of 40 percent of their incoming freshman class." If many college administrators believe that early decision plans should be abolished, why do their schools continue to use them? Can game theory help analyze this situation?

Give an example of a government-imposed barrier to entry. Why would a government be willing to erect barriers to firms entering an industry?

A column on forbes.com discussed Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon, all of which operate in oligopolistic markets. The column argued that the concerns of some policymakers and economists about the market power of these firms may be overstated because "history teaches us that in a fast-moving industry, driven by fast-changing technologies, barriers to entry may be far less significant than one might believe." a. What does the columnist mean by "barriers to entry"? Name one barrier to entry a new firm would face in competing with: i. Google in online advertising ii. Apple in smartphones iii. Facebook in social media apps iv. Amazon in online retailing b. How might "fast-changing technology" reduce the importance of each barrier to entry that you identified in part a.?

What is a sequential game?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free