Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Give brief definitions of the following concepts. a. Game theory b. Cooperative equilibrium c. Noncooperative equilibrium d. Dominant strategy e. Nash equilibrium f. Price leadership

Short Answer

Expert verified
Game theory is a theoretical framework for comprehension of social situations among competing players. A cooperative equilibrium refers to the condition where decision-making leads to an optimal outcome for the whole group. A noncooperative equilibrium is when no cooperation exists due to the lack of enforceable mechanisms. Dominant strategy refers to the optimal action that results in the highest payoff for a player. Nash equilibrium defines the optimal solution in a non-cooperative game where each player has no incentive to change their chosen strategy after considering an opponent's choice. Price leadership is a scenario where one, usually the dominant company in the industry, sets prices for goods or services that other companies follow.

Step by step solution

01

Define Game theory

Game theory is a theoretical framework for understanding social situations among competing players. In some respects, game theory is the science of strategy, or at least the optimal decision-making of independent and competing actors in a strategic setting.
02

Define Cooperative equilibrium

A cooperative equilibrium is a game theory concept where players make decisions that lead to an optimal outcome for the whole group. They cooperate in a way that maximizes group outcome, but not necessarily individual outcomes.
03

Define Noncooperative equilibrium

A noncooperative equilibrium is a solution concept in game theory in which players do not cooperate, mainly due to the lack of mechanisms that could enforce cooperation.
04

Define Dominant strategy

In game theory, a dominant strategy refers to a course of action that results in the highest payoff for a player, no matter what the other player does. Not every player in a game has a dominant strategy.
05

Define Nash equilibrium

Nash Equilibrium is a game theory concept that determines the optimal solution in a non-cooperative game in which each player lacks any incentive to deviate from their chosen strategy after considering an opponent's choice.
06

Define Price leadership

Price leadership is an economic concept that refers to a scenario where one company, usually the dominant one in the industry, sets prices for goods or services that all the other players in the industry follow.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cooperative Equilibrium
Cooperative equilibrium in game theory involves players coming together to make decisions that benefit the entire group. Despite individual players having their own goals and incentives, they choose to cooperate. This collaboration ensures that the group outcome is maximized rather than focusing on personal gain. Imagine a team project in which each member can complete a part that contributes to the success of the whole project, even if not every part brings individual accolades. By reaching a cooperative equilibrium, all members enjoy the rewards of a well-done group effort. Cooperation like this often requires trust and communication, as the players must coordinate their actions and share information to achieve the best group outcome.
Noncooperative Equilibrium
Noncooperative equilibrium refers to a scenario in game theory where players make decisions independently. Each player aims to maximize their own benefit, often leading to outcomes that are not ideal for the group. In the absence of enforceable agreements, players act based on what they believe others will do. A well-known example is the prisoner's dilemma, where two suspects may choose not to cooperate even though doing so would lead to a better collective outcome. Without a binding contract to enforce collaboration, players often focus on defending themselves and minimizing personal risk, often ignoring the potential benefits of working together.
Dominant Strategy
A dominant strategy stands out as the best choice for a player, regardless of what the others do. It guarantees the highest payoff in various game situations, making it a straightforward decision path. However, not all players will have a dominant strategy available to them, as it depends on the specific game's rules and other players' strategies. For example, in a card game, a player might consistently choose a card that yields the best return against any set of opponents' cards. This strategy simplifies decision-making, as the player doesn't need to second-guess the opponents' actions.
Nash Equilibrium
Nash Equilibrium occurs when players in a game choose strategies that offer no incentive for any player to deviate, given the strategies chosen by others. This means each player's action is optimal when considering the other players' actions. It's a stable state of equilibrium, as no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their decision. Think of two competing restaurants on the same street setting similar prices because neither would gain more customers by altering its pricing while the other remains constant. The concept is critical in understanding competitive scenarios where players reach a balance in strategy selection.
Price Leadership
Price leadership is a concept commonly seen in industries where one dominant company sets the price benchmarks for other companies. This leader, often the largest or most influential in the market, emerges naturally due to its competitive advantages. Other firms follow the leader, aligning their prices to maintain market harmony and avoid price wars. Think of a major airline setting ticket prices, followed by smaller carriers adjusting their rates accordingly. By doing so, all companies can ensure profitability while maintaining competitive equilibrium, ultimately benefiting consumers with stable prices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When Apple first launched Apple Music, singer Taylor Swift refused to allow her album \(1989,\) which had been the best-selling album of the year, to be made available for the service because Apple did not intend to pay royalties on songs it streamed during an initial three-month period when the service would be free to subscribers. In response, Apple changed its policy and agreed to pay royalties during those three months, even though doing so reduced its profit. Do singers typically have substantial bargaining power with Apple, Spotify, and the other streaming services? Briefly explain.

An economist argues that with respect to advertising in some industries, "gains to advertising firms are matched by losses to competitors" in the industry. Briefly explain the economist's reasoning. If his reasoning is correct, why do firms in these industries advertise?

Give an example of a government-imposed barrier to entry. Why would a government be willing to erect barriers to firms entering an industry?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 489 ) For many years, airlines would post proposed changes in ticket prices on computer reservation systems several days before the new ticket prices went into effect. Eventually, the federal government took action to end this practice. Now airlines can post prices on their reservation systems only for tickets that are immediately available for sale. Why would the federal government object to the old system of posting prices before they went into effect?

World War I began in August 1914 and on the Western Front quickly bogged down into trench warfare. In Belgium and northern France, British and French troops were dug into trenches facing German troops a few hundred yards away. The troops continued firing back and forth until a remarkable event occurred, which historians have labeled "The Christmas Truce." On Christmas Eve, along several sectors of the front, British and German troops stopped firing and eventually came out into the area between the trenches to sing Christmas carols and exchange small gifts. The truce lasted until Christmas night in most areas of the front, although it continued until New Year's Day in a few areas. Most of the troops" commanding officers were unhappy with the truce- they would have preferred the troops to keep fighting through Christmas - and in the future they often used a policy of rotating troops around the front so that the same British and German troops did not face each other for more than relatively brief periods. Can game theory explain why the Christmas Truce occurred? Can game theory help explain why the commanding officers' strategy was successful in reducing future unauthorized truces?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free