Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A student makes the following comment: I can understand why a perfectly competitive firm won't earn a profit in the long run because it charges a price equal to marginal cost. But a monopolistically competitive firm can charge a price greater than marginal cost, so why can't it continue to earn a profit in the long run?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A monopolistically competitive firm cannot continue to earn a profit in the long run because of the low barriers to entry. This situation allows new firms to enter the market when they see others making a profit. The consequent increase in competition and decrease in demand eliminates the companies' ability to charge more than the marginal cost, which erodes the profit. On the other hand, perfectly competitive firms do not make long-term profits because they are price takers and can’t set a price higher than the marginal cost.

Step by step solution

01

Characteristics of a Monopolistically Competitive Firm

A Monopolistically competitive firm is a type of market structure where several or many sellers produce similar, but differentiated products. Differentiated products are the key character of such firms, which means products are somewhat different from each other in branding, quality, design, features, location and more. This gives the firm some amount of market power to set its own price, which is often higher than the marginal cost.
02

Entry and Exit in the Long Run

In the long run, if firms earn positive economic profits, this will attract new firms into the market, since there are few barriers to entry in monopolistic competition. As new firms enter, the demand for the product of the existing firms will decrease, because buyers now have more products to choose from. This decrease in demand decreases the price and profit of the existing firms until they reach a state of zero economic profits.
03

Comparing Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition

In contrast, in perfect competition, firms cannot earn long-term profits because they are price takers, they settle for the equilibrium price fixed by market supply and demand. Unlike a monopolistically competitive firm, they do not have the ability to differentiate their product or set its price. Thus, any profit they make will quickly vanish due to the price being equal to the marginal cost.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Long-run Equilibrium
In the world of monopolistic competition, understanding the concept of long-run equilibrium is crucial. This market structure consists of many firms, each producing slightly different products. In the short term, firms can earn economic profits due to their ability to set prices above marginal costs. This arises from product differentiation, a distinctive feature of monopolistic competition.

However, in the long run, economic profits attract new firms into the industry. With more firms entering the market, consumers have a wider range of products to choose from, which dilutes the demand for any single firm's product. Consequently, the demand curve each firm faces becomes more elastic.

Over time, this leads to a new equilibrium where firms will no longer earn economic profits. Instead, they earn just enough to cover their costs, resulting in zero economic profits. This is because the entry of new competitors increases supply, drives down prices, and erases earlier profits. Simply put, the long-run equilibrium in monopolistic competition balances out between many firms, each earning just enough to stay in business without making extra profits.
Product Differentiation
Product differentiation is the backbone of monopolistic competition. It refers to the strategy where firms make their products stand out from the competition through various features. These can include branding, quality differences, unique features, or exceptional customer service.

In monopolistic competition, firms differentiate their products to gain some control over pricing. This market power allows firms to charge a price greater than marginal cost, unlike in perfect competition where firms are price takers.

Differentiated products appeal to specific consumer preferences. Each firm attempts to make its product unique enough to build a loyal customer base and reduce direct competition from other firms in the market. This loyalty provides firms some leeway in pricing, as consumers may be willing to pay a premium for their preferred product.

Through effective product differentiation, firms can create niche markets, tailoring their products to specific tastes and preferences and ensuring that even in a crowded market environment, they find a stable position.
Entry and Exit in Markets
Entry and exit dynamics are pivotal in understanding monopolistic competition. Given the relative ease of entering and exiting such markets, these movements greatly influence market stability and firm profitability.

When firms in monopolistic competition make economic profits, they face minimal barriers to entry. This invites new firms to join the market, amplifying product variety and alternatives available to consumers. As a result, the market becomes more competitive.

With increased competition, existing firms experience a shift. The demand for each individual firm's product declines, as new products crowd the market and steal some of their consumer base.

This pressure persists until no firm earns economic profits, achieving long-run equilibrium. Hence, while firms can momentarily enjoy profits, this dynamic self-corrects as the market halts entry when profits are non-existent, regardless of how differentiated their product is. The process of firms constantly entering and leaving the market ensures that, over time, prices adjust to produce a balanced competitive landscape.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does the fact that monopolistically competitive markets are not allocatively or productively efficient mean that there is a significant loss in economic well-being to society in these markets? In your answer, be sure to define what you mean by "economic well-being."

Isabella runs a pet salon. She is currently grooming 125 dogs per week. If instead of grooming 125 dogs, she grooms 126 dogs, she will add $68.50 to her costs and $60.00 to her revenues. What will be the effect on her profit of grooming 126 dogs instead of 125 dogs?

(Related to Solved Problem 13.3 on page 461 ) In recent years, McDonald's has faced increased competition from other fast-food restaurants. In an attempt to differentiate itself from fast-food competitors, McDonald's has responded by remodeling some restaurants to include kiosks that customers can use to pay for their orders and to request table service. Remodeling a restaurant can cost as much as $60,000. McDonald's expects that customers will spend more on food when they order with kiosks. Suppose McDonald's begins to earn an economic profit in the restaurants offering table service and kiosks. a. How are other fast-food restaurants likely to respond? b. Is this new strategy likely to enable McDonald's to earn an economic profit in the long run? Briefly explain.

A firm that is first to market with a new product frequently discovers that there are design flaws or problems with the product that were not anticipated. For example, the ballpoint pens made by the Reynolds International Pen Company often leaked. What effect do such problems cause for the innovating firm, and how do these unexpected problems create possibilities for other firms to enter the market?

A skeptic says, "Marketing research and brand management are unnecessary. If a company wants to find out what customers want, it should simply look at what they're already buying." Do you agree with this comment? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free