Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why doesn't a monopolistically competitive firm produce where \(P=M C\), as a perfectly competitive firm does?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A monopolistically competitive firm doesn't produce where P=MC, unlike a perfectly competitive firm, because it can influence the product's price by adjusting its output level. The firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve and increases quantity sold by reducing price. So, it maximizes profits where marginal cost equals marginal revenue (MC=MR), not at P=MC.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Perfect Competition

In a perfectly competitive market structure, firms are price takers. That is, they don't have the power to influence the market price. Therefore, they tend to produce where their marginal cost (MC) equals the market price (P). Consumers have perfect information, and there's free entry and exit in the market. This leads the firm to make zero economic profit in the long run.
02

Understanding Monopolistic Competition

Under monopolistic competition, firms have some degree of market power. This means firms are able to influence the price of their own product by adjusting their level of output. The products are differentiated, so each firm's product has its own demand curve. This demand curve is downward sloping, meaning that the firm can increase the quantity sold (demand), by reducing the price.
03

Distinguishing Output Levels between the Two Market Structures

A monopolistically competitive firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve and, by reducing the price, the firm can sell more quantities, unlike firms under perfect competition that need to produce where their MC equals the market price (P=MC), because the firm cannot alter its output level to alter the market price. Instead, in monopolistic competition, the firm maximizes profit where marginal cost equals marginal revenue (MC=MR) but does not equate to price (MR != P),

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Perfect Competition
In a perfectly competitive market, many firms sell an identical product, and no single firm can influence the market price. This is what we call being a "price taker." Since every firm sells the same product, consumers have perfect information about the product and prices in the market.

A key feature of perfect competition is that firms aim to produce where the marginal cost (MC) equals the market price (P). This is because each additional unit costs the firm exactly its market price; producing more would mean expenses exceed income, whereas producing less means potential income is lost. This principle helps firms cover their costs and earn no excess profit in the long run. Additionally, the market has free entry and exit, ensuring that firms can enter when profits are feasible and leave when they aren't.
Marginal Cost
Marginal cost (MC) refers to the additional expense incurred to produce one more unit of a product. It is a critical concept in both perfect and monopolistic competition.

- In perfect competition, firms set their output so that the marginal cost equals the market price. This allows them to maximize efficiency and ensure no resources are wasted. - Under monopolistic competition, the focus shifts slightly, as firms aren't as concerned with matching market prices. Instead, they compare marginal cost to marginal revenue (MR) to find the optimal production level for maximizing profit.

Understanding MC is essential because it affects production decisions. It guides firms on how much output will be profitable and helps avoid unnecessary production costs.
Marginal Revenue
Marginal Revenue (MR) is the additional revenue a firm earns from selling one more unit of a product. Its importance is underscored in monopolistic competition, where firms must consider their own demand curve.

- In perfectly competitive markets, MR equals the market price since firms cannot influence prices and each unit sold contributes equally to revenue. - However, in monopolistic competition, MR does not equal the price (P), because firms have some control over their prices. They will instead produce where MC equals MR to optimize profits.

Knowing MR helps firms understand the financial implications of increasing output and guides decisions on pricing and production levels.
Price Taker
Being a "price taker" means that a firm accepts the market price without trying to influence it. This term is most relevant in the context of perfect competition.

- In these markets, firms have no power over setting prices. They must accept the existing price, which is determined by overall supply and demand in the market. - As such, producing where MC equals P is crucial for staying competitive. If a firm tries to set a different price, consumers can easily switch to another provider, since products are identical. - This contrasts sharply with monopolistic competition, where firms have the capacity to set higher prices due to product differentiation.

Understanding the "price taker" concept helps clarify why perfectly competitive firms focus on cost efficiency and why their strategies differ from firms in markets with greater pricing power.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 464) In Chicago, Green Summit appears to be running nine different restaurants, with names such as Butcher Block, Milk Money, and Leafage. In reality, all the food for these restaurants is cooked in one central kitchen, and none of the restaurants have physical locations. The brands exist only as Web sites and on the delivery containers. An article on chicagotribune.com quoted the firm's \(\mathrm{CEO}\) as saying, "I don't really think anybody cares. They just want really high-quality food." a. If nobody cares whether a restaurant exists as a physical place, why does Green Summit have a Web site for each restaurant and packaging printed with each restaurant's name and logo? Aren't Green Summit's costs higher than if it just had a single name and one Web site? b. Does Green Summit's strategy increase or decrease productive efficiency in the restaurant business? Does the strategy increase or decrease allocative efficiency? Does it increase or decrease the well-being of its customers? Briefly explain.

(Related to Solved Problem 13.3 on page 461 ) In recent years, McDonald's has faced increased competition from other fast-food restaurants. In an attempt to differentiate itself from fast-food competitors, McDonald's has responded by remodeling some restaurants to include kiosks that customers can use to pay for their orders and to request table service. Remodeling a restaurant can cost as much as \(\$ 60,000 .\) McDonald's expects that customers will spend more on food when they order with kiosks. Suppose McDonald's begins to earn an economic profit in the restaurants offering table service and kiosks. a. How are other fast-food restaurants likely to respond? b. Is this new strategy likely to enable McDonald's to earn an economic profit in the long run? Briefly explain.

Why does a local McDonald's face a downward-sloping demand curve for its Quarter Pounders? If a McDonald's raises the price of Quarter Pounders above the prices other local fast-food restaurants charge for hamburgers, won't it lose all its customers?

In \(2016,\) Howard Shultz announced that he would step down as CEO of Starbucks to establish luxury coffee shops that would charge as much as \(\$ 12\) for a cup of coffee. Although some analysts questioned whether many consumers would be willing to pay such high prices for coffee, Erich Joachimsthaler, an executive at a brand-strategy consulting firm, believes the projects could be successful. Joachimsthaler compared the market for coffee to the market for beer, which has experienced competition from small craft breweries. "They [established companies such as Coors and Anheuser-Busch InBev] never protected themselves from the high end.... I think Starbucks sees that the middle is slowing down." a. Briefly explain what Joachimsthaler means by the "high end" and "the middle is slowing down." What relevance do his observations have for the success of Schultz's project? b. Briefly explain whether Schultz establishing luxury coffee shops illustrates: • Product differentiation • Marketing • Brand management

Does the fact that monopolistically competitive markets are not allocatively or productively efficient mean that there is a significant loss in economic well-being to society in these markets? In your answer, be sure to define what you mean by "economic well-being."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free