Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In 2017 , two beer drinkers in California filed a lawsuit against Kona Brewing Company, which sells Kona beer. The beer drinkers claimed that Kona was marketed as if it were brewed in Hawaii, but the beer is actually brewed in Oregon, Washington, Tennessee, and New Hampshire. If the market for beer were perfectly competitive, would the location of breweries matter to consumers? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a perfectly competitive market, the location of breweries would not matter to consumers as long as the quality, price, and availability of the beer remains unchanged. Consumers are concerned with these factors rather than the location of production.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Perfect Competition

To start with, perfect competition is an ideal type of market structure where there are many buyers and sellers, the products are homogenous or identical, and all buyers and sellers have perfect information about the market.
02

Assess the Importance of Brewery Location

In the context of beer consumers, the location of the breweries would matter if it has an effect on the quality, price or availability of the beer. Given the details of this case, Kona beer might be marketed as if it's made in Hawaii, but in perfect competition, what matters is whether the beer still meets customers' expectations in terms of quality, price, and availability.
03

Evaluate the Scenario

In a perfectly competitive market, as consumers have perfect information and the products are homogenous, the location of breweries should not matter. What would matter is if the change in location leads to changes in the price, taste or quality of the beer. Assuming that the beer made in all these locations has the same price, taste, and quality, it should not affect the consumer's buying decision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Structure
The market structure is a central concept in economics, particularly in understanding how different industries operate. It describes the organization and characteristics of a market. In the world of economics, market structure refers to how a market is organized in terms of competition. There are several types of market structures, each with distinct features. Some common ones include:
  • Perfect Competition: Characterized by numerous small firms, identical products, and no barriers to entry or exit.
  • Monopoly: A single firm dominates the market, offering a unique product with high entry barriers.
  • Oligopoly: A few firms control the market, often selling similar or differentiated products.
  • Monopolistic Competition: Many companies compete, but products are slightly differentiated.
Perfect competition is the idealized version where buyers and sellers have perfect information, and products are homogeneous. Understanding the market structure helps us analyze how companies in that market might behave.
Consumer Information
Consumer information plays a vital role in perfect competition. It dictates how market participants make purchasing decisions. Perfect competition implies that all consumers have complete information about the products in the market. This encompasses details like price, quality, availability, and origin. In practice, this means:
  • Consumers fully understand the differences or similarities between products.
  • Price comparisons are easy and straightforward.
  • There are no misunderstandings or misinformation about where and how products are made.
If consumers know everything about what's available, they can make fully informed decisions based on their preferences. In the case of Kona Brewing Company, if beer drinkers have complete information, they would know exactly where the beer is brewed, regardless of the marketing.
Product Homogeneity
Product homogeneity is one of the definitive characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. It means that the products offered by different sellers are indistinguishable from one another. For example:
  • Products look and function exactly the same.
  • Quality variations between sellers are negligible.
  • Consumers believe products from all sellers are substitutable.
In the context of the beer industry, this would imply that every brand of beer tastes the same to consumers and serves the same purpose. Therefore, if all beer brands are considered homogenous, branding or origin might not influence consumer preference as much as it does in markets that aren't perfectly competitive.
Beer Industry
The beer industry serves as an interesting study when considering market structures like perfect competition. In reality, the beer industry contains elements that deviate from perfect competition, such as differentiated products and brand loyalty. Here’s why:
  • Brands: Companies like Kona Brewing build strong brand identities not just based on taste but associations like origin.
  • Product Differences: Many beers offer unique flavors, ingredients, or styles that differentiate them.
  • Marketing Strategies: Breweries often rely on marketing to highlight unique aspects, appealing to consumer emotions and perceptions.
While the ideal of perfect competition suggests no importance to brewery location or brand, in practice, these elements often significantly influence consumer decisions in the beer market. This divergence from theory showcases the complex dynamics of real-world markets.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to Solved Problem 12.6 on page 439 ) Sony suffered losses selling televisions from 2004 to \(2013,\) before finally earning a small profit on this business from 2014 to 2016. Given the strong consumer demand for plasma, LCD, and LED television sets, shouldn't Sony have been able to raise prices to earn a profit during that decade of losses? Briefly explain.

How does perfect competition lead to allocative efficiency and productive efficiency?

A columnist for the Wall Street Journal discussed the fact that some firms were buying existing drilling operations in Canadian oil sands regions. These operations would not have been profitable to build from scratch but were profitable to operate given that they were already built because, as the columnist said, "The key is the distinction between fixed and variable costs. While the fixed investment in new oil sands projects is prohibitive, variable costs can be in the low \(\$ 20\) range per barrel." The columnist estimated that the fixed cost of a new oil sands drilling operation could be \(\$ 95\) per barrel. At the time the column was written, the price of oil was about \(\$ 50\) per barrel. a. Assuming that variable cost of an existing oil sands operation is \(\$ 20\) per barrel and the price of oil is \(\$ 50\) per barrel, how much were the companies selling these drilling operations losing per barrel? b. At a price of \(\$ 50\) per barrel, were the companies buying the existing drilling operations earning a profit of \(\$ 30\) per barrel? If not, explain what information we would need to calculate their profit.

According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, in 2007 the insurance company AXA Equitable signed a long-term lease on 2 million square feet of office space in a skyscraper on Sixth Avenue in Manhattan in New York City. In \(2013,\) AXA decided that it needed only 1.7 million square feet of office space, so it subleased 300,000 square feet of space to several other firms. Although AXA is paying a rent of \(\$ 88\) per square foot on all 2 million square feet it is leasing, it is only receiving \(\$ 40\) per square foot from the firms to which it is subleasing the 300,000 square feet. Briefly explain why AXA's actions might make economic sense in the short run. Would these actions make sense in the long run? Briefly explain.

What are the three conditions for a market to be perfectly competitive?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free