Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Hedrick Smith was a foreign correspondent for the New York Times who lived in the Soviet Union in the \(1970 \mathrm{~s}\), a period when the country had a planned economy rather than a market system. In a book he wrote about everyday life in the Soviet Union, Smith made the following observations about shopping in Moscow: At first it seemed \(\ldots\) that the stores were pretty well stocked. Only as we began to shop in earnest \(\ldots\) did the Russian consumer's predicament really come through to me. First, we needed textbooks for our children \(\ldots\) and found that the sixth-grade textbooks had run out.... We tried to find ballet shoes for our 11 -year-old daughter... only to discover that in this land of ballerinas, ballet shoes size 8 were unavailable in Moscow.... I tried to find shoes for myself. They were out of anything in my size but sandals or flimsy, lightweight shoes that the clerk, with one look at me, recommended against buying. "They won't last," he admitted. a. Judging by Smith's observations, briefly explain whether the Soviet Union achieved allocative efficiency in the production of sixth-grade textbooks, ballet shoes, and men's shoes. b. Can we tell from these observations whether the Soviet Union achieved productive efficiency in the production of sixth-grade textbooks, ballet shoes, and men's shoes? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Soviet Union did not achieve allocative efficiency in the production of sixth-grade textbooks, ballet shoes size 8 and men's shoes, as the goods produced did not match the consumer demand. However, we cannot definitively determine from the available observations if the Soviet Union achieved productive efficiency in the production of these goods as there's no reference to actual production costs.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Allocative Efficiency

The allocative efficiency deals with whether the goods produced match the goods desired by consumers. Looking at Smith's account, it can be concluded that the Soviet Union did not achieve allocative efficiency. The short supplies of sixth-grade textbooks and ballet shoes size 8 denote a failure to meet consumer demand in those areas. Additionally, the only shoes available in Smith's size were either sandals or flimsy varieties, again indicating that the supply did not meet the consumer demands.
02

Analyze Productive Efficiency

Productive efficiency refers to producing goods at the least cost possible. In Smith's account, there's no direct reference to the costs of production. Hence, based on the given information, it cannot be definitively stated whether the Soviet Union achieved productive efficiency in the production of sixth-grade textbooks, ballet shoes, and men's shoes
03

Summarize the findings

Based on the available information in Smith's account, it can be concluded that Soviet Union had not achieved allocative efficiency for the mentioned goods. As for productive efficiency, the provided observations don't give enough information to form a conclusion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Allocative Efficiency
Allocative efficiency occurs when goods and services are distributed according to consumer preferences. This means that the availability of goods perfectly matches what consumers want. In the context of a planned economy like the Soviet Union, achieving allocative efficiency can be challenging. The government typically controls the production and distribution of goods, with the aim of fulfilling a planned quota rather than responding to real-time consumer demand. Hedrick Smith's observations in Moscow highlight a clear issue: desired goods like sixth-grade textbooks and specific shoe sizes were not available, indicating a misalignment between production and consumer desires. This scarcity suggests a lack of allocative efficiency, as the supplies did not meet the actual demands of the citizens. The absence of items that consumers wanted, such as textbooks and properly fitting shoes, is a sign that the system failed to allocate resources effectively according to what people need. This concept is crucial because it impacts consumer satisfaction and the overall effectiveness of a planned economic system.
Productive Efficiency
Productive efficiency is achieved when goods are produced using the least amount of resources and cost. It means producing at maximum output with given resources, minimizing waste. In a planned economy, this is theoretically managed by the state through meticulous planning and control. However, Smith's notes do not provide enough information about the cost of production or resource usage, making it difficult to determine productive efficiency in the Soviet Union.

Even if a certain amount of goods were produced, we cannot assess if this was done at the lowest cost possible. For productive efficiency to be evident, it must be known whether the goods are produced using the least amount of resources and time, ensuring resource optimization. This aspect highlights the importance of looking at production processes and resource allocation when evaluating an economy's efficiency. While Smith's observations focus more on the consumer perspective than production specifics, they still hint at inefficiencies in how resources might have been allocated and utilized.
Consumer Demand in Planned Economies
Consumer demand in planned economies is often overlooked due to the nature of centralized planning. In these systems, the government decides what is produced, how much, and at what price, rather than relying on market forces of supply and demand seen in market economies.

Smith's experiences shed light on the disconnect between consumer desires and available products. Even basic consumer goods sometimes do not align with public demand, leading to shortages and unmet needs. For instance, the unavailability of certain sizes of shoes and educational materials like textbooks exemplifies how central planning might miss the nuances of individual consumer preferences.

This misalignment can result in stores being stocked with unwanted goods, while popular items remain scarce. It highlights a challenge within planned economies – accurately gauging and responding to the population's dynamic needs and wants, which are crucial for consumer satisfaction. Understanding consumer demand is vital as it influences policy adjustments to better align with the citizens' preferences, aiming for a balance that might increase the perceived effectiveness of the central planning model.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How is the market supply curve derived from the supply curves of individual firms?

A columnist for the Wall Street Journal discussed the fact that some firms were buying existing drilling operations in Canadian oil sands regions. These operations would not have been profitable to build from scratch but were profitable to operate given that they were already built because, as the columnist said, "The key is the distinction between fixed and variable costs. While the fixed investment in new oil sands projects is prohibitive, variable costs can be in the low \(\$ 20\) range per barrel." The columnist estimated that the fixed cost of a new oil sands drilling operation could be \(\$ 95\) per barrel. At the time the column was written, the price of oil was about \(\$ 50\) per barrel. a. Assuming that variable cost of an existing oil sands operation is \(\$ 20\) per barrel and the price of oil is \(\$ 50\) per barrel, how much were the companies selling these drilling operations losing per barrel? b. At a price of \(\$ 50\) per barrel, were the companies buying the existing drilling operations earning a profit of \(\$ 30\) per barrel? If not, explain what information we would need to calculate their profit.

In 2017 , two beer drinkers in California filed a lawsuit against Kona Brewing Company, which sells Kona beer. The beer drinkers claimed that Kona was marketed as if it were brewed in Hawaii, but the beer is actually brewed in Oregon, Washington, Tennessee, and New Hampshire. If the market for beer were perfectly competitive, would the location of breweries matter to consumers? Briefly explain.

The chapter states, "Firms will supply all those goods that provide consumers with a marginal benefit at least as great as the marginal cost of producing them." A student objects to this statement, arguing, "I doubt that firms will really do this. After all, firms are in business to make a profit; they don't care about what is best for consumers." Evaluate the student's argument.

The following questions are about long-run equilibrium in the market for cage- free eggs. a. As described in the chapter opener, in 2017 was the market for cage-free eggs in long-run equilibrium? Briefly explain. b. What would we expect to happen to the price of cagefree eggs and the quantity of cage-free eggs produced in the long run? Briefly explain. c. As of \(2017,\) the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) did not have detailed guidelines for egg farmers to follow before they could claim that the eggs they sell were laid by cage-free chickens. Some animal rights activists were pushing for the USDA to enact stricter guidelines than many egg farmers were following voluntarily. Such guidelines would be likely to significantly raise the cost of producing cage-free eggs. Suppose that the USDA begins to require these stricter guidelines. What effect will this increase in cost have on the long-run price of cage-free eggs? In the long run, will the quantity of cage-free eggs be larger, smaller, or the same as it would have been without the USDA adopting the guidelines? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free