Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Peter Reinhardt, CEO of Segment.com, made the following comment on his blog when discussing how the firm's noisy open office was lowering the productivity of its engineers: "We can't immediately ditch our open floor plan (although we're looking at various options for our next office.)" Why can't the firm immediately ditch its open floor plan? Is Reinhardt's remark about Segment.com's economic short run or its economic long run? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Segment.com cannot immediately change its open floor plan due to constraints that make the office structure a fixed factor in the short run. Reinhardt's comment therefore pertains to the economic short run, but his mention of exploring options for the next office suggests consideration of long-run economic factors, where all factors of production could be variable.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Factors of Production

Factors of production in this scenario are the office (physical capital) and the engineers (labour). It's mentioned that Segment.com's open floor plan, a feature of the office, is causing productivity loss among its engineers.
02

Understand the Constraints

The CEO's comment implies that they cannot immediately change their open floor plan due to some constraints. These constraints could involve the costs of restructuring the office, disruptions to the work environment, or even the terms of a lease agreement.
03

Evaluate Time Frame

Lastly, we need to evaluate whether Reinhardt's remark refers to the short run or the long run in economic terms. Given that the existing floor plan cannot be immediately modified, the office's physical structure is a fixed factor in the short run. Therefore, this situation falls under the short run in economics.
04

Explain the Evaluation in the Last Step

Reinhardt's comment refers to the short run, during which some factors of production (in this case, the office layout) are fixed. However, his mention of looking into options for their next office suggests that they do have plans to change this factor in the long run, thereby implying that all factors of production could potentially be variable in the long run.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Factors of Production
In the world of economics, the factors of production are crucial elements that businesses need to produce goods and services. They generally include four main components: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. In the example given, we see two main factors at play: the office or physical infrastructure, which represents capital, and the engineers, who represent labor. These factors are critical because they directly influence the productivity and operations of any business.

Physical capital, like the office space at Segment.com, includes all man-made assets used in the production process, such as buildings and machinery. The layout and functionality of the office can greatly affect how efficiently engineers perform their tasks. Labor, on the other hand, refers to the human effort and skills that go into producing a product, which in this case is the work done by the engineers. A conducive work environment can enhance their performance, while unfavorable conditions, as noted with the noisy open floor plan, might lower their productivity.
Short Run
In economics, the short run is a period where at least one factor of production is fixed. Businesses face constraints that prevent them from adjusting these inputs immediately. This is especially true in the context of Segment.com's open office plan, which cannot be changed instantaneously due to various limitations.

For instance, altering the office layout might require significant financial expenditure, disrupt ongoing work, or even breach any existing lease agreements. These constraints lead to a scenario where the company needs to operate under the current limitations until they can properly plan and execute changes. As such, the CEO's comment reflects a challenge that is typical of the short run: dealing with fixed factors that cannot be altered swiftly.
Long Run
The long run, in contrast to the short run, is a time frame in which all factors of production can be adjusted. Businesses have the flexibility to make both significant and minute changes to improve efficiency and operations. For Segment.com, while the open office is a fixed factor right now, the CEO's mention of exploring new office options plants their plans firmly in the long-term strategy.

In the long run, the company can consider various possibilities, such as relocating to a new office, redesigning the existing floor plan, or even redefining work processes to improve productivity. It's a period where the constraints of the short run lift, allowing for more thorough planning and implementation of changes. Hence, all factors of production, including labor and capital, could eventually be adjusted to meet the firm’s evolving needs and objectives.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 374) Segment.com reorganized its office as part of its "antidistraction campaign." According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, the company cut back on its internal text messaging service and moved "some of its communication back to email to reduce the number of notifications employees were receiving." a. Is it possible that this movement from a new technology-text messaging-to an older technologye-mail-represented positive technological change at Segment? Briefly explain. b. Suppose that competition for software engineers results in Segment.com having to pay them higher salaries. Would the fact that the firm will now face an increased cost of providing its services be an example of negative technological change? Briefly explain.

Explain why the marginal cost curve intersects the average total cost curve at the level of output where average total cost is at a minimum.

What is minimum efficient scale? What is likely to happen in the long run to firms that do not reach minimum efficient scale?

(This problem is somewhat advanced.) Using symbols, we can write that the marginal product of labor is equal to \(\Delta Q / \Delta L .\) Marginal cost is equal to \(\Delta \mathrm{TC} / \Delta Q .\) Because fixed costs by definition don't change, marginal cost is also equal to \(\Delta \mathrm{VC} / \Delta \mathrm{Q} .\) If jill Johnson's only variable cost (VC) is labor cost, then her variable cost equals the wage multiplied by the quantity of workers hired, or \(w \mathrm{~L}\) a. If the wage Jill pays is constant, then what is \(\Delta V C\) in terms of \(w\) and \(L ?\) b. Use your answer to part (a) and the expressions given for the marginal product of labor and the marginal cost of output to find an expression for marginal cost, \(\Delta \mathrm{TC} / \Delta \mathrm{Q},\) in terms of the wage, \(w,\) and the marginal product of labor, \(\Delta Q / \Delta L\) c. Use your answer to part (b) to determine Jill's marginal cost of producing pizzas if the wage is \(\$ 750\) per week and the marginal product of labor is 150 pizzas. If the wage falls to \(\$ 600\) per week and the marginal product of labor is unchanged, what happens to Jill's marginal cost? If the wage is unchanged at \(\$ 750\) per week and the marginal product of labor rises to 250 pizzas, what happens to Jill's marginal cost?

In describing the optimal size of an investment fund, a writer for the Wall Street Journal observed: … at first, bigger is better for both investors and managers…. Managing money is expensive. Small funds have many fixed costs…. If a fund is small, it can’t generate enough fees to cover costs…. The result is that in terms of performance, funds should want to get big to cover costs and maximize returns, but not so big that diseconomies of scale erode returns. Draw a graph of a long-run average cost curve for a typical firm in the investment fund industry. In your graph, draw and label the following. a. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has not reached minimum efficient scale b. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has reached minimum efficient scale c. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that experiences diseconomies of scale d. A range of output within which investment funds experience constant returns to scale

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free