Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In recent years, the United States has experienced large increases in oil production due in large part to a new technology, hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"). Fracking involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into rock formations at high pressure to release oil and natural gas. An article in the Wall Street Journal indicates that economies of scale in fracking may be considerably smaller than in conventional oil drilling. If this view is correct, what would the likely consequences be for the number of firms drilling for oil in the United States?

Short Answer

Expert verified
If the economies of scale in fracking are smaller than in conventional oil drilling, this would likely lead to an increase in the number of firms drilling for oil in the United States, as there would be lower barriers to entry for smaller firms and less cost advantage for larger firms.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Economies of Scale

Economies of scale refers to the situation where the average cost per unit of output decreases with the increase in the scale of output. If economies of scale are small, this means that larger firms do not have a significant cost advantage over smaller firms.
02

Applying the Concept to Fracking

Given that fracking has smaller economies of scale compared to traditional oil drilling, firms do not gain significant cost advantages as they increase their size. This decreases the barrier to entry for new firms, as large established firms do not have a significant cost advantage over them.
03

Implication for Number of Firms

With lower barriers to entry and less cost advantage for larger firms, more firms are likely to enter the market to take advantage of the profitability of oil drilling. Therefore, the number of firms drilling for oil in the United States would likely increase.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Economies of Scale
When we talk about economies of scale, we're discussing a principle that is pivotal to understanding how businesses grow and succeed. More specifically, in the context of oil production, economies of scale imply that a company can lower the average cost for each barrel of oil produced as the company’s production volume increases. This is usually achieved through the spread of fixed costs over a larger number of units, improved operational efficiencies, or bulk purchasing discounts.

For example, think of a bakery that buys flour in bulk—the cost per loaf of bread decreases because the price of flour per loaf is reduced. However, when economies of scale are smaller, like in the case of hydraulic fracturing, larger firms don't save as much on costs relative to smaller firms as they expand their operations. As a result, smaller and newer firms might find it easier to compete, since the playing field is somewhat leveled. This could lead to a more diverse market with a greater number of companies.
Hydraulic Fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, has revolutionized the oil and natural gas industry. It involves injecting a high-pressure cocktail of water, sand, and chemicals into rock formations deep underground. The pressure created by this mixture fractures the rock, which allows the trapped oil or natural gas to flow more freely to the production wells.

This technique has enabled producers to extract resources from previously inaccessible or uneconomical reserves. Its application has contributed to the United States becoming a leading producer of oil and gas. Understanding this doesn’t just involve science and geology, but also economics and business strategy. The efficiency and cost-effectiveness of fracking can significantly influence market dynamics and the competitive landscape of the energy sector.
Barriers to Entry
Barriers to entry are factors that make it difficult for new firms to break into an industry. High barriers might include things like substantial initial capital investment, complex technology, stringent government regulations, or strong brand loyalty for existing products. In industries with high economies of scale, the large incumbent firms enjoy a significant cost advantage that can act as a barrier to new entrants.

In the case of fracking, if the economies of scale are smaller, and thus larger firms don't have a pronounced cost advantage, these barriers are lower. As a result, new players might be more willing to enter the market. This could lead to increased competition, more innovation, and potentially more competitive pricing for consumers. For those studying business or economics, understanding the implications of these barriers on market structure is crucial.
Oil Production Technology
Advancements in oil production technology have profoundly affected the energy industry. From traditional drilling to newer methods like hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, each technological leap offers ways to optimize the extraction process and access new resources.

Technology in oil production does not only pertain to the drilling hardware but also encompasses the software and techniques used for exploration, data analysis, and reservoir management. Innovation in this area is a constant race—one that can significantly influence an oil company's profitability. With the advent of fracking, the technology has allowed operators to quickly adjust production levels and respond to market demands, influencing both the supply and pricing in the global market. However, this rapid advancement can also pose challenges as companies must stay current with the latest methods or risk falling behind competitors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is minimum efficient scale? What is likely to happen in the long run to firms that do not reach minimum efficient scale?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 376) An article in the New York Times on the airline industry described airlines as being "burdened by high fixed costs." What are likely to be the most important fixed costs for an airline? Are airlines likely to have particularly high fixed costs relative to their variable costs when compared with, say, an Old Navy clothing store or a Panera Bread restaurant? Briefly explain.

When the DuPont chemical company first attempted to enter the paint business, it was not successful. According to a company report, in one year it "lost nearly \(\$ 500,000\) in actual cash in addition to an expected return on investment of nearly \(\$ 500,000,\) which made a total loss of income to the company of nearly a million." Why did this report include as part of the company's loss the amount it had expected to earn \(-\) but didn't \(-\) on its investment in manufacturing paint?

EOG, a Texas-based producer of oil and gas, is called the "Apple of oil" because of the company's history of developing innovative methods to extract energy from shale rock. Using one of EOG's innovations, called iSteer, the company can navigate through thousands of feet of rock with a drill bit that allows for greater recovery oil and gas than methods the company previously used. Briefly explain why economists would consider EOG's use of iSteer an example of technological change.

(This problem is somewhat advanced.) Using symbols, we can write that the marginal product of labor is equal to \(\Delta Q / \Delta L .\) Marginal cost is equal to \(\Delta \mathrm{TC} / \Delta Q .\) Because fixed costs by definition don't change, marginal cost is also equal to \(\Delta \mathrm{VC} / \Delta \mathrm{Q} .\) If jill Johnson's only variable cost (VC) is labor cost, then her variable cost equals the wage multiplied by the quantity of workers hired, or \(w \mathrm{~L}\) a. If the wage Jill pays is constant, then what is \(\Delta V C\) in terms of \(w\) and \(L ?\) b. Use your answer to part (a) and the expressions given for the marginal product of labor and the marginal cost of output to find an expression for marginal cost, \(\Delta \mathrm{TC} / \Delta \mathrm{Q},\) in terms of the wage, \(w,\) and the marginal product of labor, \(\Delta Q / \Delta L\) c. Use your answer to part (b) to determine Jill's marginal cost of producing pizzas if the wage is \(\$ 750\) per week and the marginal product of labor is 150 pizzas. If the wage falls to \(\$ 600\) per week and the marginal product of labor is unchanged, what happens to Jill's marginal cost? If the wage is unchanged at \(\$ 750\) per week and the marginal product of labor rises to 250 pizzas, what happens to Jill's marginal cost?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free