Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the difference between the short run and the long run? Is the amount of time that separates the short run from the long run the same for every firm?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short run is a period where some factors of production are fixed, while in the long run, all factors of production are variable. The time that separates the short run from the long run varies for each firm, depending on various factors.

Step by step solution

01

Defining short run and long run

The short run in economics is a period in which certain factors in the production process are fixed. This means that they cannot change. For example, if a firm owns a factory, it can't be modified or sold within the short run. On the other hand, in the long run, all factors of production can be varied. This means that elements such as capital stock, number of firms, and size of the firm can be changed.
02

Differences between Short Run and Long Run

In the short run, a firm cannot change certain factors of production, and thus they continue operating with the same scale of production. However, in the long run, all factors of production are variable, such as input prices, technology, and the scale of operation. This allows firms to adjust to changes in the market environment, and they have sufficient time to plan and implement their decisions.
03

Assessing the consistency of the time frame for all firms

The exact time that separates the short run from the long run is not the same for every firm. It varies based on the individual firm's circumstances, including the industry they operate in and the type of goods or services they produce.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Factors of Production
The concept of factors of production is central to understanding the difference between the short run and long run in economics. Factors of production are the resources used in the creation of goods and services, which include labor, land, capital, and entrepreneurship.

In the short run, at least one factor of production is fixed. For instance, a business might have a set number of machines (capital) it cannot alter immediately. This limitation means that the company can increase output only by maximizing the use of existing capital with more labor or by optimizing production schedules.

In contrast, the long run is characterized by the ability to change all factors of production. This flexibility allows for improvements like upgrading machinery, moving to a larger facility, or investing in new technologies, which can lead to increased production capacity and efficiency.

Understanding these concepts helps explain the exercise where the distinction between fixed and variable factors in different timeframes is crucial for business decision-making processes.
Scale of Operation
Scale of operation refers to the scope of a business's activities, including the size of production and the capacity to meet market demand. In the short run, the scale of operation is typically limited to the existing capacity; a restaurant might only have a certain number of seats or a factory may have a limited number of production lines.

However, in the long run, businesses can adjust their scale of operation by expanding or reducing their production capacity. They can invest in more efficient technologies, acquire additional facilities, hire more staff, or downsize operations to align with market conditions.

Effective scale adjustment is a strategic decision that can influence a company's competitive advantage. By aligning scale with demand, businesses can optimize costs, meet customer needs more effectively, and position themselves for sustainable growth.
Production Time Frames
Production time frames are critical in determining managerial strategies and planning. The exercise point on varying time frames between short run and long run across different firms illustrates the flexibility needed based on the company’s circumstances.

In the short run, firms are constrained by existing resources and current conditions, which means they must operate within these limitations. This period typically does not allow for significant infrastructural changes but involves optimizing current operations for maximum productivity. It requires acute management of day-to-day activities and quick adaptive measures to immediate market changes.

On the other hand, the long run provides the opportunity for strategic planning and execution. Long-term time frames allow businesses to undertake significant changes such as expanding their product line, entering new markets, or restructuring the organization to improve performance.

The variability in length of these time frames from one firm to another depends on multiple factors such as the speed of technological change, the nature of the industry, and the company's resources and capabilities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In describing the optimal size of an investment fund, a writer for the Wall Street Journal observed: … at first, bigger is better for both investors and managers…. Managing money is expensive. Small funds have many fixed costs…. If a fund is small, it can’t generate enough fees to cover costs…. The result is that in terms of performance, funds should want to get big to cover costs and maximize returns, but not so big that diseconomies of scale erode returns. Draw a graph of a long-run average cost curve for a typical firm in the investment fund industry. In your graph, draw and label the following. a. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has not reached minimum efficient scale b. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has reached minimum efficient scale c. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that experiences diseconomies of scale d. A range of output within which investment funds experience constant returns to scale

Suppose jill Johnson operates her pizza restaurant in a building she owns in the center of the city. Similar buildings in the neighborhood rent for $4,000 per month. Jill is considering selling her building and renting space in the suburbs for $3,000 per month, but she decides not to make the move. She reasons: "I would like to have a restaurant in the suburbs, but I pay no rent for my restaurant now, and 1 don't want to see my costs rise by $3,000 per month." Evaluate jill's reasoning.

Suppose a firm has no fixed costs, so all its costs are variable, even in the short run. a. If the firm's marginal costs are continually increasing (that is, marginal cost is increasing from the first unit of output produced), will the firm's average total cost curve have a U shape? Briefly explain. b. If the firm's marginal costs are $5 at every level of output, what shape will the firm's average total cost have?

Suppose that Henry Ford had continued to experience economies of scale, no matter how large an automobile factory he built. Discuss what the implications of this would have been for the automobile industry.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 374) Segment.com reorganized its office as part of its "antidistraction campaign." According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, the company cut back on its internal text messaging service and moved "some of its communication back to email to reduce the number of notifications employees were receiving." a. Is it possible that this movement from a new technology-text messaging-to an older technologye-mail-represented positive technological change at Segment? Briefly explain. b. Suppose that competition for software engineers results in Segment.com having to pay them higher salaries. Would the fact that the firm will now face an increased cost of providing its services be an example of negative technological change? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free