Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an article in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, Ted O'Donoghue and Matthew Rabin made the following observation: "People have self-control problems caused by a tendency to pursue immediate gratification in a way that their 'long-run selves' do not appreciate." What do they mean by people's "long-run selves"? Give two examples of people pursuing immediate gratification that their longrun selves would not appreciate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The term 'long-run selves' implies a future perspective or version of oneself that reaps the outcomes of present decisions, with respect to long-term goals and consequences. Two examples of immediate gratification not appreciated by long-run selves could be unhealthy eating habits and not saving money for the future. In both cases, short-term pleasure might result in long-term disadvantages such as potential health issues and inadequate savings.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the concept of 'long-run selves'

The term 'long-run selves' typically refers to the future perspective or version of oneself. It's about the self who reaps the outcomes of current decisions, taking into account long-term goals and consequences. When these economists talk about 'long-run selves', they imply that individuals often make choices today that can potentially harm them in the future. This disparity between short-term and long-term preferences reveals a self-control issue.
02

Give the first example

One common example to illustrate this could be unhealthy eating habits. Someone might choose to eat fast food for lunch because it's convenient and tasty, pursuing immediate gratification. However, their long-run self, who prioritizes health and longevity, wouldn't appreciate this choice because a consistent pattern of such behavior could lead to health issues including obesity, heart disease, or diabetes.
03

Give the second example

Another example is choosing to spend money on non-essential items or entertainment instead of saving for the future. The immediate gratification comes from the enjoyment of a new purchase or experience. However, in the long run, this kind of behavior could result in inadequate savings for emergencies, retirement, or larger life goals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Immediate Gratification
Immediate gratification refers to the desire to experience pleasure or fulfillment without delay or deferment. In terms of economics, this concept involves consumers choosing to receive a benefit right now rather than waiting for a potentially larger or more enduring benefit in the future.

For instance, when someone impulsively buys a luxury item on credit rather than saving the money for a more significant future purchase, they are opting for immediate gratification. This choice might feel satisfying in the short term, but it can lead to financial strain due to accumulating interest and a decreased ability to afford future expenses.

Another example is procrastination, where an individual might choose to watch a movie instead of studying for an exam. The enjoyment is immediate, but the long-term consequence could be poor academic performance, which could impact career opportunities. These choices emphasize the human tendency to prioritize present comfort over future benefits, which economic models try to factor into understanding consumer behavior.
The Concept of Long-Run Selves
Our 'long-run selves' represent our future identity, projecting our current decisions' long-term outcomes and how they align with our ultimate goals and well-being. The concept plays a crucial role in examining the implications of economic choices over time.

When individuals prioritize their long-run selves, they make decisions that may require present sacrifices but offer significant future payoffs. For example, investing in education may mean foregoing immediate earnings by not working full-time. However, the increased knowledge and qualifications can lead to better job opportunities and higher lifetime earnings.

Conversely, when individuals neglect their long-run selves, they might indulge in behaviors like overspending or neglecting health, which can result in future financial or physical hardships. Economic models must account for how individuals weigh their short-term desires against their long-term well-being when predicting economic decision-making.
Economic Decision-Making
Economic decision-making is the process by which individuals, households, firms, and governments make choices about the allocation of resources. Self-control plays a pivotal role in this process, as it involves evaluating the costs and benefits associated with different courses of action.

A key component in economic decision-making is the trade-off between present consumption and future savings. Economists use tools like present value and discount rates to model how individuals value future benefits compared to immediate ones. High discount rates indicate a strong preference for immediate rewards, often leading to choices that satisfy short-term urges, such as impulsive shopping or indulgent eating habits.

Understanding these concepts helps explain why people might overconsume resources or fail to invest in their futures, despite knowing the potential negative consequences. Economic policies and personal financial planning often try to mitigate these tendencies, encouraging actions that favor long-term benefits over short-term gains.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Wall Street Journal reported that customers who shopped at Neiman Marcus and other high-end retailers were becoming more resistant to paying high prices for clothing and accessories: High-end [retailers] which raised prices incessantly over the past decade, are learning the hard way that even wealthy customers are hunting for better deals and selection, whether online or at shops run by individual brands. ... Neiman's Chief Executive Karen Katz \(\ldots\) reduced snob appeal by allowing Neiman shoppers to use Visa and MasterCard. Previously, the stores only accepted American Express or Neiman credit cards. a. What does the article mean by "snob appeal"? Is there an economic explanation for it? Briefly explain. b. Why might losing snob appeal be a problem for highend retailers like Neiman Marcus?

How is the market demand curve derived from consumers' individual demand curves?

Which of the following products are most likely to have significant network externalities? Briefly explain. a. Smartphones b. Dog food c. Board games d. LCD televisions e. 3D televisions

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average price of heating oil fell to under \(\$ 3.00\) a gallon during the winter of \(2014-2015,\) the lowest price in more than four years. About 6.2 million U.S. households in the Northeast rely on the fuel to heat their homes. For the following questions, assume that no factor that affects the demand for heating oil, other than its price, changed during the winter of \(2014-2015\). a. If households in the Northeast increased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015,\) can we conclude that for these households, heating oil was a normal good? Briefly explain. b. If households in the Northeast decreased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015,\) can we conclude that for these households heating oil is an inferior good? Briefly explain. c. If households in the Northeast decreased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015\), can we conclude that for these households heating oil is a Giffen good? Briefly explain.

Richard Thaler, winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics, was first to use the term endowment effect to describe placing a higher value on something already owned than would be placed on the object if not currently owned. According to an article in the Economist: Dr. Thaler, who recently had some expensive bottles of wine stolen, observes that he is "now confronted with precisely one of my own experiments: these are bottles I wasn't planning to sell and now I'm going to get a cheque from an insurance company and most of these bottles I will not buy. I'm a good enough economist to know there's a bit of an inconsistency there." Based on Thaler's statement, how do his stolen bottles of wine illustrate the endowment effect? Why did he make the statement: "I'm a good enough economist to know there's a bit of an inconsistency there"?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free