Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 346 ) The following excerpt is from a letter sent to a financial advice columnist: "My wife and I are trying to decide how to invest a \(\$ 250,000\) windfall. She wants to pay off our \(\$ 114,000\) mortgage, but I'm not eager to do that because we refinanced only nine months ago, paying \(\$ 3,000\) in fees and costs." Briefly discuss what effect the \(\$ 3,000\) refinancing cost should have on this couple's investment decision.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The $3,000 refinancing cost should not affect the couple's decision as it is a sunk cost - a cost already incurred and can't be recovered. The investment decision should be based on a comparison between the mortgage interest rate and the potential return rate from other investments.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept of Sunk Costs

In economics and business decision-making, a sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered. In this scenario, the $3,000 refinancing fee is a sunk cost; it has been paid and cannot be retrieved, regardless of what the couple decides to do with the $250,000 windfall.
02

Applying the Sunk Cost Concept to the Situation

The refinancing fee should not have an impact on the couple's decision on how to use the $250,000. Letting sunk costs affect decisions can lead to the sunk cost fallacy, where past investments are allowed to dictate future financial decisions, which doesn't lead to efficient outcomes.
03

Suggestion for Investment Decision

Whether or not to pay off the mortgage should be determined by comparing the mortgage's interest rate with the potential return rate from other investments. If the mortgage interest rate is higher than the expected return rate from other investments, it can be more beneficial to pay off the mortgage. If not, then investing the windfall could be a better option.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Investment Decision
When making an investment decision, it's vital to weigh the potential returns against associated risks and current obligations. In the scenario presented, the couple has a significant windfall of $250,000, and they are considering whether to use this to pay off their existing $114,000 mortgage. Each investment decision involves evaluating alternative opportunities to ensure the most efficient and effective use of funds.

Factors to consider in making this decision include:
  • Potential returns from other investments if they choose not to pay the mortgage.
  • The terms of their current mortgage, such as interest rates and durations.
  • General economic conditions that might affect investment returns, like market trends and interest rates.
Ultimately, making a well-informed investment decision requires balancing these considerations to achieve financial goals.
Refinancing Fee
A refinancing fee is an upfront cost you pay when you take out a new loan to replace an existing one. This new loan generally has different terms, such as a lower interest rate, different duration, or conditions that are more favorable to the borrower's current financial situation.

However, the couple in this situation has already paid $3,000 in refinancing fees. Since these fees have already been incurred, they should not let this payment cloud their judgment on what to do with the $250,000 windfall. Instead, they should focus on current financial needs and future potential gains. Refinancing fees, while influencing initial decisions to refinance, should not factor into future investment choices because they are already spent. This brings us to the concept of sunk cost, which will be expanded upon later.
Mortgage Interest Rate
The mortgage interest rate is a critical factor in deciding whether to pay off a mortgage or invest elsewhere. This rate dictates how much additional money the borrower will pay over the lifecycle of the loan. If a mortgage interest rate is high, it might be financially wise to pay off the loan instead of investing the windfall in potentially lower-yield schemes.

To determine the best course of action, compare the mortgage interest rate with expected returns from other investment opportunities. Here are some steps to follow:
  • Calculate the effective interest rate of the mortgage, incorporating any tax benefits.
  • Research potential investment opportunities and their expected rates of return.
  • Compare the costs and returns to decide which option maximizes financial benefit.
Paying off the mortgage might provide a guaranteed return, equivalent to the interest rate, ensuring funds saved on interest contribute to overall financial health.
Sunk Cost Fallacy
The sunk cost fallacy is a common cognitive error where people continue investing in a situation due to previously invested resources (like time, money, or effort), rather than based on current benefits and prospects. In this context, the $3,000 refinancing fee is a sunk cost. The decision on how to use the $250,000 should not be influenced by this previous expense.

Here's why avoiding the sunk cost fallacy is important:
  • Makes sure decisions are based on future potential, not past costs.
  • Prevents financial errors by focusing only on current resource allocation and opportunities.
  • Allows for a more rational evaluation of present facts and options.
By focusing only on future gains and current parameters, the couple can make a decision that truly aligns with their financial goals, rather than letting past costs lead them astray.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Maya spends her \(\$ 50\) budget on two goods, cans of tuna and bottles of ginger ale. Initially, the marginal utility per dollar she spends on tuna is equal to the marginal utility per dollar she spends on ginger ale. Then the price of ginger ale decreases, while her income and the price of tuna do not change. Determine whether each of the following statements about what happens as a result of the decrease in the price of ginger ale is true or false and briefly explain why. a. Her marginal utility from consuming ginger ale increases. b. The marginal utility per dollar she spends on ginger ale increases. c. Because of the substitution effect, Maya will buy more ginger ale. Therefore, we can conclude that ginger ale is a normal good. d. As Maya adjusts to the change in the price of ginger ale, her marginal utility per dollar spent on tuna will increase.

What are network externalities? For what types of products are network externalities likely to be important? What is path dependence?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 346) In 2012 , the San Francisco Giants Major League Baseball team signed pitcher Matt Cain to a contract that paid him a salary of \(\$ 20\) million per year from 2013 through 2017 . The annual salaries were all guaranteed, and the Giants had to pay Cain whether he performed well or not \(-\) and they had to pay him even if the team released him and he no longer played for the Giants. During \(2016,\) Cain pitched ineffectively, and at the beginning of the 2017 season, it was uncertain whether the Giants would keep him as a regular player. Giants General Manager Bobby Evans was quoted as saying that in the decision on Cain, his salary wasn't a factor: "It's really not about the money at this point." Is Evans's analysis correct? Should the salary the Giants are paying Cain matter in deciding whether to keep him on the team? Would the team's decision be affected if Cain were receiving the Major League Baseball minimum salary of \(\$ 535,000 ?\) Briefly explain.

How is the market demand curve derived from consumers' individual demand curves?

An article in the Economist noted that for the Broadway musical Hamilton, "Every time the show's producers release a new block [of tickets] to sell, they immediately get snapped up by 'ticket bots,' high-speed ticket-buying software." The musical's producer called the ticket bots "computerized cheaters." a. How do people earn a profit from using the bots to buy tickets? b. Is there a strategy the musical's producer could use to eliminate the profit earned by the ticket bots? If so, why doesn't he use it?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free