Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

According to the FBI Bank Crime Statistics, there were more than 4,000 bank robberies in the United States in 2015, an increase of 3.9 percent over 2014 . The FBI claims that banks have made themselves easy targets by refusing to install clear acrylic partitions, called bandit barriers, that separate bank tellers from the public. According to a special agent with the FBI, "Bandit barriers are a great deterrent. We've talked to guys who rob banks, and as soon as they see a bandit barrier, they go find another bank." Despite this finding, many banks have been reluctant to install these barriers. Wouldn't banks have a strong incentive to install bandit barriers to deter robberies? Why, then, do so many banks not install them?

Short Answer

Expert verified
While bandit barriers might indeed deter robberies, there could be several reasons why banks opt not to install them; these may include potential costs of installation and maintenance, the effect on customer service experiences, and other business factors that outweigh the risk of robbery.

Step by step solution

01

Consider Initial Information

From the FBI Bank Crime Statistics of 2015, it was observed that there was a 3.9 percent increase in bank robberies from 2014. It is also noted that the FBI indicates that bandit barriers serve as a deterrent to robberies.
02

Analyze Possible Reasons

While the FBI suggests that bandit barriers deter bank robberies, it seems that many banks have not installed them. Reasons could include the cost of installation and maintenance of these barriers. Banks may view this as a cost they wish to avoid, as the loss from robberies may be less than the cost of installing and maintaining these barriers.
03

Explore Other Factors

Other factors that could be considered include the impact on customers' interaction and experience. Banks might believe that these barriers create a less friendly and welcoming atmosphere, potentially affecting their customers negatively. Banks must balance the risk of robberies against their commitment to a certain level of customer service.
04

Understand Bank Priorities

Banks have their own priorities, which may include profits, customer satisfaction, brand image, and operational efficiency. Sometimes, these priorities may require some risks, including the risk of robbery. These factors may explain why banks might choose not to install bandit barriers, despite the potential to decrease robbery.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

FBI Bank Crime Statistics
Bank crimes, particularly robberies, remain a threat to financial institutions, and the FBI's Bank Crime Statistics provide critical insights into the trends and patterns of these incidents. In 2015, there was a noted 3.9 percent increase in bank robberies over the previous year. These statistics are necessary for understanding the scale of the issue and for banks and law enforcement to develop effective strategies to counter these crimes. The data collected helps in identifying hotspots for bank robberies and times when banks are most vulnerable, informing the security measures that need to be in place to protect both the banks’ assets and the people within.

It's important for students analyzing such statistics to not only consider raw numbers but also the underlying causes contributing to changes in crime rates. While the FBI emphasizes the efficacy of deterrence measures like bandit barriers, they are just one element in a complex decision-making matrix for banks.
Deterrence in Bank Robberies
Deterrence plays a critical role in bank security measures. The FBI asserts that bandit barriers are highly effective in deterring potential bank robbers, prompting them to search for less secure targets. The psychology behind deterrence involves making the potential cost of a robbery—in terms of risk of capture or injury—higher than the potential reward.

However, deterrence is not solely about physical barriers; it encompasses an array of security measures, such as surveillance cameras, alarm systems, and the presence of security guards. These measures work together to create a security ecosystem that is meant to discourage criminal attempts before they occur. Students must understand that while deterrence is powerful, its effectiveness can vary based on robbers' perceptions and bank policies, and it is just one factor in the security equation.
Cost-Benefit Analysis in Banking Security
The decision to invest in specific security measures, such as bandit barriers, is often the result of a cost-benefit analysis by the banks. Financial institutions have to weigh the costs of installation and upkeep of security features against the potential losses from robberies and the likelihood of such events. If the cost of implementing certain security measures exceeds the potential financial loss from robberies, a bank may opt to absorb the risk rather than invest in costly deterrents.

Students should recognize that cost-benefit analysis in banking security isn't just about immediate financials—it also includes consideration of long-term reputation, customer trust, and regulatory compliance. Moreover, banks may have insurance policies that mitigate losses from robberies, impacting the cost side of the analysis. Cost-benefit analysis is a dynamic and multifaceted process that goes beyond simple number crunching to include risk management, strategic planning, and customer relationship considerations.
Customer Experience and Bank Design
While security is paramount, banks must also focus on customer experience, which can be heavily influenced by the design and layout of the bank. Though bandit barriers can be an effective security measure, they may also impart a fortress-like environment that detracts from a welcoming atmosphere that banks aim to provide. Customer experience involves ensuring that clients feel valued and safe without feeling overburdened by overt security measures.

Bank design must strike a balance between robust security protocols and a design that promotes an open and friendly customer service environment. This includes not only physical design elements but also the way customers are interacted with during transactions. Banks consider factors like visibility, accessibility, and customer flow in their design, ensuring that while the environment appears secure, it also remains customer-centric. In educating students about these design principles, it is vital to make clear that customer experience is not merely a secondary consideration but a key component in a bank's brand identity and operational success.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Warren Buffett is the chief executive officer of the investment firm Berkshire Hathaway and one of the wealthiest people in the world. In an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Buffett argued that economic policies in the United States should be designed so that people who are willing to work receive enough income to live a "decent lifestyle." He argued that an expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) would be superior to an increase in the minimum wage as a means to reach this goal. The EITC is a program under which the federal government makes payments to low-income workers. Is Buffett correct that it is the role of the federal government to make sure people who work will have enough income to live a "decent lifestyle"?

What is scarcity? Why is scarcity central to the study of economics?

Briefly explain whether each of the following is primarily a microeconomic issue or a macroeconomic issue. a. The effect of higher cigarette taxes on the quantity of cigarettes sold b. The effect of higher income taxes on the total amount of consumer spending c. The reasons the economies of East Asian countries grow faster than the economies of sub-Saharan African countries d. The reasons for low rates of profit in the airline industry

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 5) Jay Bhattacharya and Kate Bundorf of Stanford University have found evidence that people who are obese and who work for firms that provide health insurance receive lower wages than workers at those firms who are not obese. At firms that do not provide health insurance, obese workers do not receive lower wages than workers who are not obese. a. Why might firms that provide workers with health insurance pay a lower wage to obese workers than to workers who are not obese? b. Is Bhattacharya and Bundorf's finding relevant to the question of whether health insurance provides people with an incentive to become obese? Briefly explain.

Consider an organization that exists to help the poor. The members of the organization are discussing alternative methods of aiding the poor, when a proponent of one particular method asserts, "If even one poor person is helped with this method, then all our time and money would have been worth it." If you were a member of the organization, how would you reply to this assertion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free