Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The accompanying diagram shows the market for cigarettes. The current equilibrium price per pack is \(\$ 4,\) and every day 40 million packs of cigarettes are sold. In order to recover some of the health care costs associated with smoking, the government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2\) per pack. This will raise the equilibrium price to \(\$ 5\) per pack and reduce the equilibrium quantity to 30 million packs. The economist working for the tobacco lobby claims that this tax will reduce consumer surplus for smokers by \(\$ 40\) million per day, since 40 million packs now cost \(\$ 1\) more per pack. The economist working for the lobby for sufferers of second-hand smoke argues that this is an enormous overestimate and that the reduction in consumer surplus will be only \(\$ 30\) million per day, since after the imposition of the tax only 30 million packs of cigarettes will be bought and each of these packs will now cost \(\$ 1\) more. They are both wrong. Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The actual reduction in consumer surplus per day is \$10 million.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding consumer surplus

Consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay for a good. In this case, we are looking at the change in consumer surplus before and after the government imposed the tax on cigarette packs.
02

Calculate consumer surplus before the tax

Before the tax, the equilibrium price per pack was \(\$ 4\) and there were 40 million packs sold per day. The total expenditure by the consumers on cigarettes can be calculated as \(4 \times 40 \, million = \$ 160\, million\) per day.
03

Calculate consumer surplus after the tax

After the tax, the equilibrium price per pack is \(\$ 5\) and there are 30 million packs sold per day. The total expenditure after the tax can be calculated as \(5 \times 30 \, million = \$ 150\, million\) per day.
04

Calculate the change in consumer surplus

The change in consumer surplus can be calculated by subtracting the consumer surplus after the tax from the consumer surplus before the tax: \(160\, million - 150\, million = \$ 10\, million\) per day.
05

Compare the change in consumer surplus with the economists' claims

Both economists are wrong because they both overestimated the reduction in consumer surplus. The economist working for the tobacco lobby claimed a reduction of \(\$ 40\, million\) per day, and the economist working for the lobby for sufferers of second-hand smoke claimed a reduction of \(\$ 30\, million\) per day. However, the actual reduction in consumer surplus is only \(\$ 10\, million\) per day.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the $\$ 2.50$ September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

In the United States, each state government can impose its own excise tax on the sale of cigarettes. Suppose that in the state of North Texarkana, the state government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2.00\) per pack sold within the state. In contrast, the neighboring state of South Texarkana imposes no excise tax on cigarettes. Assume that in both states the pre-tax price of a pack of cigarettes is \(\$ 1.00 .\) Assume that the total cost to a resident of North Texarkana to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana is \(\$ 1.85\) per pack. (This includes the cost of time, gasoline, and so on.) Assume that the supply curve for cigarettes is neither perfectly elastic nor perfectly inelastic.a. Draw a diagram of the supply and demand curves for cigarettes in North Texarkana showing a situation in which it makes economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. b. Draw a corresponding diagram showing a situation in which it does not make economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. c. Suppose the demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic. How high could the cost of smuggling a pack of cigarettes go until a North Texarkanan no longer found it profitable to smuggle? d. Still assume that demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic and that all smokers in North Texarkana are smuggling their cigarettes at a cost of \(\$ 1.85\) per pack, so no tax is paid. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack? Suppose chip- embedded cigarette packaging makes it impossible to smuggle cigarettes across the state border. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack?

Each of the following tax proposals has income as the tax base. In each case, calculate the marginal tax rate for each level of income. Then calculate the percentage of income paid in taxes for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 5,000\) and for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 40,000 .\) Classify the tax as being proportional, progressive, or regressive. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional \(\$ 1\) in income that is taxed away.)a. All income is taxed at \(20 \%\). b. All income up to \(\$ 10,000\) is tax-free. All income above \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at a constant rate of \(20 \%\). c. All income between \(\$ 0\) and \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at \(10 \%\). All income between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(20 \%\). All income higher than \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(30 \%\). d. Each individual who earns more than \(\$ 10,000\) pays a lump-sum tax of $\$ 10,000\(. If the individual's income is less than \)\$ 10,000$, that individual pays in taxes exactly what his or her income is. e. Of the four tax policies, which is likely to cause the worst incentive problems? Explain.

You are advising the government on how to pay for national defense. There are two proposals for a tax system to fund national defense. Under both proposals, the tax base is an individual's income. Under proposal A, all citizens pay exactly the same lump-sum tax, regardless of income. Under proposal B, individuals with higher incomes pay a greater proportion of their income in taxes. a. Is the tax in proposal A progressive, proportional, or regressive? What about the tax in proposal B? b. Is the tax in proposal A based on the ability-to-pay principle or on the benefits principle? What about the tax in proposal \(\mathrm{B}\) ? c. In terms of efficiency, which tax is better? Explain.

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free