Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The accompanying diagram shows the market for cigarettes. The current equilibrium price per pack is \(\$ 4,\) and every day 40 million packs of cigarettes are sold. In order to recover some of the health care costs associated with smoking, the government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2\) per pack. This will raise the equilibrium price to \(\$ 5\) per pack and reduce the equilibrium quantity to 30 million packs. The economist working for the tobacco lobby claims that this tax will reduce consumer surplus for smokers by \(\$ 40\) million per day, since 40 million packs now cost \(\$ 1\) more per pack. The economist working for the lobby for sufferers of second-hand smoke argues that this is an enormous overestimate and that the reduction in consumer surplus will be only \(\$ 30\) million per day, since after the imposition of the tax only 30 million packs of cigarettes will be bought and each of these packs will now cost \(\$ 1\) more. They are both wrong. Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The actual reduction in consumer surplus per day is \$10 million.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding consumer surplus

Consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay for a good. In this case, we are looking at the change in consumer surplus before and after the government imposed the tax on cigarette packs.
02

Calculate consumer surplus before the tax

Before the tax, the equilibrium price per pack was \(\$ 4\) and there were 40 million packs sold per day. The total expenditure by the consumers on cigarettes can be calculated as \(4 \times 40 \, million = \$ 160\, million\) per day.
03

Calculate consumer surplus after the tax

After the tax, the equilibrium price per pack is \(\$ 5\) and there are 30 million packs sold per day. The total expenditure after the tax can be calculated as \(5 \times 30 \, million = \$ 150\, million\) per day.
04

Calculate the change in consumer surplus

The change in consumer surplus can be calculated by subtracting the consumer surplus after the tax from the consumer surplus before the tax: \(160\, million - 150\, million = \$ 10\, million\) per day.
05

Compare the change in consumer surplus with the economists' claims

Both economists are wrong because they both overestimated the reduction in consumer surplus. The economist working for the tobacco lobby claimed a reduction of \(\$ 40\, million\) per day, and the economist working for the lobby for sufferers of second-hand smoke claimed a reduction of \(\$ 30\, million\) per day. However, the actual reduction in consumer surplus is only \(\$ 10\, million\) per day.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Equilibrium Price
The concept of equilibrium price is crucial in understanding how the market operates. It is the price point at which the quantity of a good demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers. In a perfectly competitive market, the forces of supply and demand find a natural balance, and this is the equilibrium price. It is like a seesaw balancing act, where the preferences of buyers and the production abilities of sellers are equal.

In the case of the cigarette market discussed in the exercise, the equilibrium price was initially \(\\(4\) per pack, with 40 million packs sold. This means that at a price of \(\\)4\), the quantity of cigarettes smokers were willing to buy was exactly what was available in the market.

Changes in equilibrium price occur when external factors affect either supply or demand, such as taxation, changes in consumer preferences, or variations in production costs.
Taxation Impact
When the government imposes a tax on a good, it directly affects the market dynamics by altering the price consumers pay and the price producers receive. This taxation, represented in the exercise as a \(\\(2\) per pack tax on cigarettes, raises the cost for consumers and can change their buying behavior.

A tax influences the supply curve, shifting it upwards by the amount of the tax. This shift means that for every pack sold, an additional \(\\)2\) must be paid to the government. Consequently, the price consumers see is higher, altering their demand for the product. In simple terms, taxes make a product more expensive from the consumer's perspective, usually decreasing the quantity demanded.
  • Consumers tend to buy less because the price goes up.
  • Producers may earn less per item sold because the government's cut reduces their profit margins.
  • The resulting price increase and drop in sales volume lead to market adjustments to a new equilibrium.
Market Equilibrium
Market equilibrium is the point where supply meets demand. After the imposition of a tax, market equilibrium is re-established at a new price and quantity where the quantities demanded and supplied are once more equal.

In the cigarette example, the tax changed the equilibrium conditions. Initially, the equilibrium was at \(\\(4\) and 40 million packs. Post-tax, the equilibrium price adjusted to \(\\)5\) per pack, with only 30 million packs being sold.

This new equilibrium conditions arise because the higher price leads consumers to demand fewer cigarettes, and producers adjust the quantity supplied to match the new lower demand. It's a flexible system where prices and quantities continue to adjust until a new balance is achieved.
Cigarette Market
The cigarette market provides a unique context to study economic principles due to its regular interaction with taxation and health policies. Cigarettes, being products with significant social and health implications, are often subject to government regulations and taxes.

In this market, demand can be relatively inelastic, meaning consumers may not significantly change their quantity purchased even when prices increase. However, significant tax rates, as in our scenario, eventually push some consumers away from buying as many cigarettes as before, reducing the quantity demanded.
  • Health policies use taxes to discourage smoking.
  • Even with inelasticity, a high enough price will see demand decreases.
  • The market must balance consumer needs with health regulations, a constant economic consideration.
Economic Surplus
Economic surplus is the sum of consumer and producer surplus in the market. It is a measure of the market's efficiency and overall welfare, representing the total benefits available to society from the production and consumption of goods and services.

Consumer surplus represents the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay. Producer surplus is the difference between what producers are willing to accept for a good versus what they actually receive.

In the context of this exercise, the introduction of a tax reduces consumer surplus because consumers are now paying more for fewer goods. Taxes create a deadweight loss, a loss of economic efficiency. This deadweight loss represents the total welfare lost to society due to the tax imposition, reducing both consumer and producer surplus.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the \(\$ 2.50\) September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

You work for the Council of Economic Advisers, providing economic advice to the White House. The president wants to overhaul the income tax system and asks your advice. Suppose that the current income tax system consists of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income and that there is one person in the country who earns \(\$ 110\) million; everyone else earns less than \(\$ 100\) million. The president proposes a tax cut targeted at the very rich so that the new tax system would consist of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income up to \(\$ 100\) million and a marginal tax rate of \(0 \%\) (no tax) on income above \(\$ 100\) million. You are asked to evaluate this tax proposal. a. For incomes of \(\$ 100\) million or less, is this proposed tax system progressive, regressive, or proportional? For incomes of more than \(\$ 100\) million? Explain. b. Would this tax system create more or less tax revenue, other things equal? Is this tax system more or less efficient than the current tax system? Explain.

Each of the following tax proposals has income as the tax base. In each case, calculate the marginal tax rate for each level of income. Then calculate the percentage of income paid in taxes for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 5,000\) and for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 40,000 .\) Classify the tax as being proportional, progressive, or regressive. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional \(\$ 1\) in income that is taxed away.)a. All income is taxed at \(20 \%\). b. All income up to \(\$ 10,000\) is tax-free. All income above \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at a constant rate of \(20 \%\). c. All income between \(\$ 0\) and \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at \(10 \%\). All income between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(20 \%\). All income higher than \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(30 \%\). d. Each individual who earns more than \(\$ 10,000\) pays a lump-sum tax of \(\$ 10,000\). If the individual's income is less than \(\$ 10,000\), that individual pays in taxes exactly what his or her income is. e. Of the four tax policies, which is likely to cause the worst incentive problems? Explain.

The state needs to raise money, and the governor has a choice of imposing an excise tax of the same amount on one of two previously untaxed goods: the state can tax sales of either restaurant meals or gasoline. Both the demand for and the supply of restaurant meals are more elastic than the demand for and the supply of gasoline. If the governor wants to minimize the deadweight loss caused by the tax, which good should be taxed? For each good, draw a diagram that illustrates the deadweight loss from taxation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free