Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

All states impose excise taxes on gasoline. According to data from the Federal Highway Administration, the state of California imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 0.40\) per gallon of gasoline. In 2013, gasoline sales in California totaled 18.4 billion gallons. What was California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax? If California doubled the excise tax, would tax revenue double? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: No, doubling the excise tax on gasoline in California does not necessarily double the tax revenue. This is because the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax, which depends on factors like price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. Higher tax might lead to higher prices for consumers, which could result in lower consumption rates, or it may have no significant effect on consumption, depending on these factors.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate California's tax revenue from gasoline excise tax

To calculate the tax revenue, we will multiply the excise tax per gallon by the total gallons of gasoline sold in California. Excise tax per gallon = $0.40 Total gallons sold = 18.4 billion gallons Tax revenue = excise tax per gallon * total gallons sold Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons}
02

Compute the tax revenue

Calculate the tax revenue: Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons} = \$7.36\text{ billion} So, California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax was $7.36 billion.
03

Analyze if doubling the tax revenue would double the tax revenue

Doubling the excise tax would result in the new excise tax being: New excise tax per gallon = \(0.40 * 2 = \)0.80 However, we cannot assume that doubling the tax would double the revenue because it might affect the demand for gasoline. Increasing the tax could result in higher prices for consumers, which could lead to lower consumption rates. Alternatively, it may also not have a significant effect on consumption and thus double the tax revenue. The way demand for gasoline reacts to tax changes depends on various factors, such as price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. In summary, tax revenue from gasoline excise tax in California was $7.36 billion. Doubling the excise tax might not necessarily double the tax revenue, as the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gasoline Demand
Gasoline demand refers to the amount of gasoline that consumers are willing and able to purchase at a given price. In simple terms, it's how much people want gas when the price is set to a certain level. When the excise tax on gasoline increases, the price at the pump might also rise. This, in turn, can influence the demand for gasoline. If the price goes up, people might start looking for alternative transportation like biking or carpooling.
It’s important to remember that gasoline demand is not only determined by price. Other factors such as income levels, geographic area, and availability of public transportation also play critical roles. In areas where cars are the primary mode of transportation, gasoline demand might be less sensitive to price changes. People still need to drive to work or run daily errands, regardless of the price hike.
Thus, understanding the nuances of gasoline demand is crucial when considering the effects of increasing excise taxes. It's not a straightforward calculation because human behavior, especially around essential commodities like fuel, is complex.
Tax Revenue
Tax revenue generated from gasoline excise taxes comes from multiplying the tax rate by the volume of gallons sold. In California, for example, a tax of $0.40 per gallon yielded $7.36 billion in revenue. This calculation is straightforward as long as the demand remains constant.
But thinking about whether doubling the tax rate would double the revenue requires deeper consideration. In theory, if demand for gasoline remains stable, revenue might double. However, as we saw, demand is likely to shift when prices rise. If people buy less gasoline due to a higher tax, the actual revenue may not increase as anticipated.
  • Initially: Revenue = $0.40 (tax) × 18.4 billion gallons = $7.36 billion
  • If tax doubles: $0.80 (tax) × (quantity sold likely less than 18.4 billion gallons)
Therefore, actual tax revenue depends heavily on how sensitive consumers are to the change in gasoline prices. Policymakers need to be careful and consider elasticity to predict tax outcomes.
Price Elasticity
Price elasticity of demand measures how sensitive the quantity demanded is to a change in price. It tells us how much the demand for gasoline will change when the price increases due to a higher excise tax. Mathematically, price elasticity of demand is calculated as:\[\text{Elasticity} = \frac{\text{Percentage change in quantity demanded}}{\text{Percentage change in price}}\]
Gasoline typically has inelastic demand, meaning that people's gas-buying habits don't change dramatically with price increases. This can be because gasoline is a necessity for many, limiting their ability to reduce consumption. But even inelastic goods have some elasticity.
When considering whether to double excise taxes, understanding elasticity helps address how pricing changes might affect demand and revenue. If elasticity is low, higher prices won't reduce gasoline purchases much; revenue increases will be closer to double. However, with higher elasticity, the impact on demand could significantly reduce potential revenue gains.
Policymakers use elasticity to gauge the likely effects of tax adjustments, making it a vital concept for predicting economic behavior when excise taxes change.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are advising the government on how to pay for national defense. There are two proposals for a tax system to fund national defense. Under both proposals, the tax base is an individual's income. Under proposal A, all citizens pay exactly the same lump-sum tax, regardless of income. Under proposal B, individuals with higher incomes pay a greater proportion of their income in taxes. a. Is the tax in proposal A progressive, proportional, or regressive? What about the tax in proposal B? b. Is the tax in proposal A based on the ability-to-pay principle or on the benefits principle? What about the tax in proposal \(\mathrm{B}\) ? c. In terms of efficiency, which tax is better? Explain.

In Transylvania the basic income tax system is fairly simple. The first 40,000 sylvers (the official currency of Transylvania) earned each year are free of income tax. Any additional income is taxed at a rate of \(25 \% .\) In addition, every individual pays a social security tax, which is calculated as follows: all income up to 80,000 sylvers is taxed at an additional \(20 \%\), but there is no additional social security tax on income above 80,000 sylvers. a. Calculate the marginal tax rates (including income tax and social security tax) for Transylvanians with the following levels of income: 20,000 sylvers, 40,000 sylvers, and 80,000 sylvers. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional 1 sylver in income that is taxed away.) b. Is the income tax in Transylvania progressive, regressive, or proportional? Is the social security tax progressive, regressive, or proportional? c. Which income group's incentives are most adversely affected by the combined income and social security tax systems?

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the \(\$ 2.50\) September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

Each of the following tax proposals has income as the tax base. In each case, calculate the marginal tax rate for each level of income. Then calculate the percentage of income paid in taxes for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 5,000\) and for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 40,000 .\) Classify the tax as being proportional, progressive, or regressive. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional \(\$ 1\) in income that is taxed away.)a. All income is taxed at \(20 \%\). b. All income up to \(\$ 10,000\) is tax-free. All income above \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at a constant rate of \(20 \%\). c. All income between \(\$ 0\) and \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at \(10 \%\). All income between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(20 \%\). All income higher than \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(30 \%\). d. Each individual who earns more than \(\$ 10,000\) pays a lump-sum tax of \(\$ 10,000\). If the individual's income is less than \(\$ 10,000\), that individual pays in taxes exactly what his or her income is. e. Of the four tax policies, which is likely to cause the worst incentive problems? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free