Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

All states impose excise taxes on gasoline. According to data from the Federal Highway Administration, the state of California imposes an excise tax of $\$ 0.40$ per gallon of gasoline. In 2013, gasoline sales in California totaled 18.4 billion gallons. What was California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax? If California doubled the excise tax, would tax revenue double? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: No, doubling the excise tax on gasoline in California does not necessarily double the tax revenue. This is because the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax, which depends on factors like price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. Higher tax might lead to higher prices for consumers, which could result in lower consumption rates, or it may have no significant effect on consumption, depending on these factors.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate California's tax revenue from gasoline excise tax

To calculate the tax revenue, we will multiply the excise tax per gallon by the total gallons of gasoline sold in California. Excise tax per gallon = $0.40 Total gallons sold = 18.4 billion gallons Tax revenue = excise tax per gallon * total gallons sold Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons}
02

Compute the tax revenue

Calculate the tax revenue: Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons} = \$7.36\text{ billion} So, California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax was $7.36 billion.
03

Analyze if doubling the tax revenue would double the tax revenue

Doubling the excise tax would result in the new excise tax being: New excise tax per gallon = \(0.40 * 2 = \)0.80 However, we cannot assume that doubling the tax would double the revenue because it might affect the demand for gasoline. Increasing the tax could result in higher prices for consumers, which could lead to lower consumption rates. Alternatively, it may also not have a significant effect on consumption and thus double the tax revenue. The way demand for gasoline reacts to tax changes depends on various factors, such as price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. In summary, tax revenue from gasoline excise tax in California was $7.36 billion. Doubling the excise tax might not necessarily double the tax revenue, as the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Transylvania the basic income tax system is fairly simple. The first 40,000 sylvers (the official currency of Transylvania) earned each year are free of income tax. Any additional income is taxed at a rate of \(25 \% .\) In addition, every individual pays a social security tax, which is calculated as follows: all income up to 80,000 sylvers is taxed at an additional \(20 \%\), but there is no additional social security tax on income above 80,000 sylvers. a. Calculate the marginal tax rates (including income tax and social security tax) for Transylvanians with the following levels of income: 20,000 sylvers, 40,000 sylvers, and 80,000 sylvers. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional 1 sylver in income that is taxed away.) b. Is the income tax in Transylvania progressive, regressive, or proportional? Is the social security tax progressive, regressive, or proportional? c. Which income group's incentives are most adversely affected by the combined income and social security tax systems?

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the $\$ 2.50$ September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

In the United States, each state government can impose its own excise tax on the sale of cigarettes. Suppose that in the state of North Texarkana, the state government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2.00\) per pack sold within the state. In contrast, the neighboring state of South Texarkana imposes no excise tax on cigarettes. Assume that in both states the pre-tax price of a pack of cigarettes is \(\$ 1.00 .\) Assume that the total cost to a resident of North Texarkana to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana is \(\$ 1.85\) per pack. (This includes the cost of time, gasoline, and so on.) Assume that the supply curve for cigarettes is neither perfectly elastic nor perfectly inelastic.a. Draw a diagram of the supply and demand curves for cigarettes in North Texarkana showing a situation in which it makes economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. b. Draw a corresponding diagram showing a situation in which it does not make economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. c. Suppose the demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic. How high could the cost of smuggling a pack of cigarettes go until a North Texarkanan no longer found it profitable to smuggle? d. Still assume that demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic and that all smokers in North Texarkana are smuggling their cigarettes at a cost of \(\$ 1.85\) per pack, so no tax is paid. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack? Suppose chip- embedded cigarette packaging makes it impossible to smuggle cigarettes across the state border. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack?

The state needs to raise money, and the governor has a choice of imposing an excise tax of the same amount on one of two previously untaxed goods: the state can tax sales of either restaurant meals or gasoline. Both the demand for and the supply of restaurant meals are more elastic than the demand for and the supply of gasoline. If the governor wants to minimize the deadweight loss caused by the tax, which good should be taxed? For each good, draw a diagram that illustrates the deadweight loss from taxation.

Assess the following four tax policies in terms of the benefits principle versus the ability-to-pay principle. a. A tax on gasoline that finances maintenance of state roads b. An \(8 \%\) tax on imported goods valued in excess of \(\$ 800\) per household brought in on passenger flights c. Airline-flight landing fees that pay for air traffic control d. A reduction in the amount of income tax paid based on the number of dependent children in the household.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free