Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
#Answer# a. The equilibrium price and quantity for imported trucks in the absence of government interference are found where the supply and demand curves intersect. This equilibrium point (P*, Q*) can be illustrated on a diagram with price on the vertical axis and quantity on the horizontal axis. b. The excise tax of $3,000 on each imported truck causes the supply curve to shift upwards by $3,000. The new equilibrium point (P', Q') is determined where the new supply curve intersects the demand curve. The price paid by consumers (P'_C) is equal to P', while the price received by foreign automakers (P'_F) is P' - $3,000. c. Government revenue generated by the excise tax is calculated as $3,000 * Q', and it can be represented on the diagram as a rectangle with a base extending from Q* to Q' and a height of the $3,000 excise tax. d. The excise tax on imported trucks benefits American automakers by making foreign trucks more expensive and potentially increasing the demand for domestic trucks. However, it hurts foreign automakers and consumers who must pay higher prices for imported trucks. The inefficiency from this policy leads to a potential deadweight loss, which can be represented on the diagram as a triangle with the tax wedge, having a height of the tax amount and a base being the difference between Q* and Q'.

Step by step solution

01

Find the equilibrium price and quantity

To find the equilibrium price and quantity, we need to find the price level at which the quantity demanded (from the demand schedule) is equal to the quantity supplied (from the supply schedule). Then, the equilibrium price is P* (with P* being the price where the two curves intersect), and the equilibrium quantity is Q* (with Q* being the number of imported trucks at that intersection).
02

Illustrate the equilibrium with a diagram

On the diagram, plot the demand curve and the supply curve, with the price on the vertical axis and the quantity on the horizontal axis. The point where the two curves intersect represents the equilibrium (P*, Q*). Label this point on the diagram. b.
03

Analyze the effect of the excise tax and find the new equilibrium

The imposition of a \(3,000 excise tax on each imported truck will lead to a vertical shift upward of the supply curve, since the cost of each truck increases by \)3,000. Find the new equilibrium point by looking for where the new supply curve intersects the demand curve. This point represents the new equilibrium price (P') and quantity (Q').
04

Calculate the price paid by consumers and price received by foreign automakers

The price paid by consumers (P'_C) will be the new equilibrium price (P'). The price received by the foreign automakers (P'_F) will be P' - $3,000, since the automakers receive the consumer price minus the excise tax.
05

Illustrate the effect of the excise tax on the diagram from part a

On the diagram from part a, draw the new supply curve shifted upwards by $3,000. Label the new equilibrium point (P', Q') where this new supply curve intersects the demand curve. c.
06

Calculate government revenue

Government revenue from the excise tax can be calculated as: Revenue = tax per truck * quantity of imported trucks sold = $3,000 * Q'.
07

Illustrate government revenue on the diagram

On the diagram, government revenue is represented as a rectangle, with the base extending from Q* to Q' on the horizontal axis, and the height being the 3,000$ excise tax. Shade this rectangle in. d.
08

Discuss the benefits, losers, and inefficiency

The excise tax on imported trucks benefits American automakers by making foreign trucks more expensive, which may lead to higher demand for domestic trucks. The policy hurts foreign automakers and consumers who must pay higher prices for imported trucks. Inefficiency arises since resources may not be allocated optimally, leading to a potential deadweight loss, which can be represented as a triangle on the diagram containing the tax wedge, where the height is the tax amount and the base is the difference of Q* and Q'.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the United States, each state government can impose its own excise tax on the sale of cigarettes. Suppose that in the state of North Texarkana, the state government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2.00\) per pack sold within the state. In contrast, the neighboring state of South Texarkana imposes no excise tax on cigarettes. Assume that in both states the pre-tax price of a pack of cigarettes is \(\$ 1.00 .\) Assume that the total cost to a resident of North Texarkana to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana is \(\$ 1.85\) per pack. (This includes the cost of time, gasoline, and so on.) Assume that the supply curve for cigarettes is neither perfectly elastic nor perfectly inelastic.a. Draw a diagram of the supply and demand curves for cigarettes in North Texarkana showing a situation in which it makes economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. b. Draw a corresponding diagram showing a situation in which it does not make economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. c. Suppose the demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic. How high could the cost of smuggling a pack of cigarettes go until a North Texarkanan no longer found it profitable to smuggle? d. Still assume that demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic and that all smokers in North Texarkana are smuggling their cigarettes at a cost of \(\$ 1.85\) per pack, so no tax is paid. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack? Suppose chip- embedded cigarette packaging makes it impossible to smuggle cigarettes across the state border. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack?

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the $\$ 2.50$ September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

All states impose excise taxes on gasoline. According to data from the Federal Highway Administration, the state of California imposes an excise tax of $\$ 0.40$ per gallon of gasoline. In 2013, gasoline sales in California totaled 18.4 billion gallons. What was California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax? If California doubled the excise tax, would tax revenue double? Why or why not?

The accompanying diagram shows the market for cigarettes. The current equilibrium price per pack is \(\$ 4,\) and every day 40 million packs of cigarettes are sold. In order to recover some of the health care costs associated with smoking, the government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2\) per pack. This will raise the equilibrium price to \(\$ 5\) per pack and reduce the equilibrium quantity to 30 million packs. The economist working for the tobacco lobby claims that this tax will reduce consumer surplus for smokers by \(\$ 40\) million per day, since 40 million packs now cost \(\$ 1\) more per pack. The economist working for the lobby for sufferers of second-hand smoke argues that this is an enormous overestimate and that the reduction in consumer surplus will be only \(\$ 30\) million per day, since after the imposition of the tax only 30 million packs of cigarettes will be bought and each of these packs will now cost \(\$ 1\) more. They are both wrong. Why?

Each of the following tax proposals has income as the tax base. In each case, calculate the marginal tax rate for each level of income. Then calculate the percentage of income paid in taxes for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 5,000\) and for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 40,000 .\) Classify the tax as being proportional, progressive, or regressive. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional \(\$ 1\) in income that is taxed away.)a. All income is taxed at \(20 \%\). b. All income up to \(\$ 10,000\) is tax-free. All income above \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at a constant rate of \(20 \%\). c. All income between \(\$ 0\) and \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at \(10 \%\). All income between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(20 \%\). All income higher than \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(30 \%\). d. Each individual who earns more than \(\$ 10,000\) pays a lump-sum tax of $\$ 10,000\(. If the individual's income is less than \)\$ 10,000$, that individual pays in taxes exactly what his or her income is. e. Of the four tax policies, which is likely to cause the worst incentive problems? Explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free