Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Each of the following tax proposals has income as the tax base. In each case, calculate the marginal tax rate for each level of income. Then calculate the percentage of income paid in taxes for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 5,000\) and for an individual with a pre-tax income of \(\$ 40,000 .\) Classify the tax as being proportional, progressive, or regressive. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional \(\$ 1\) in income that is taxed away.)a. All income is taxed at \(20 \%\). b. All income up to \(\$ 10,000\) is tax-free. All income above \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at a constant rate of \(20 \%\). c. All income between \(\$ 0\) and \(\$ 10,000\) is taxed at \(10 \%\). All income between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(20 \%\). All income higher than \(\$ 20,000\) is taxed at \(30 \%\). d. Each individual who earns more than \(\$ 10,000\) pays a lump-sum tax of $\$ 10,000\(. If the individual's income is less than \)\$ 10,000$, that individual pays in taxes exactly what his or her income is. e. Of the four tax policies, which is likely to cause the worst incentive problems? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: For Tax Proposal a, with constant rate of 20%, the marginal tax rate is 20% for both incomes. The percentage of income paid in taxes for $5,000 and $40,000 is both 20%. This tax is proportional. For Tax Proposal b, with 0% tax on income up to $10,000 and 20% on income above $10,000, the marginal tax rate is 0% for $5,000 and 20% for $40,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes for $5,000 is 0% and for $40,000 is 15%. This tax is progressive. For Tax Proposal c, with marginal tax rates of 10%, 20%, and 30% for different income brackets, the marginal tax rate is 10% for $5,000 and 30% for $40,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes for $5,000 is 10% and for $40,000 is 25%. This tax is progressive. For Tax Proposal d, with a marginal tax rate of 100% for incomes below $10,000 and 0% for incomes above $10,000, the marginal tax rate is 100% for $5,000 and 0% for $40,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes for $5,000 is 100% and for $40,000 is 25%. This tax is regressive. The tax policy with the worst incentive problems is Tax Proposal d, as it creates disincentives for low-income individuals to work and might increase inequality.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation for Tax Proposal a.

All income is taxed at a constant rate of \(20\%\). Therefore, the marginal tax rate is also \(20\%\).
02

Calculation for Tax Proposal b.

There are two income brackets here - income up to \(10,000 (tax-free), and income above \)10,000 (taxed at \(20\%)\). The marginal tax rate for income up to \(10,000 is \)0\%\(. For income above \)10,000, the marginal tax rate is \(20\%\).
03

Calculation for Tax Proposal c.

There are three income brackets - between \(0\) and \(10,000 (taxed at \)10\%)\(, between \)10,000\( and \)20,000 (taxed at \(20\%)\), and higher than \(20,000 (taxed at \)30\%)\(. The marginal tax rates are \)10\%\(, \)20\%\(, and \)30\%$ respectively for the three income brackets.
04

Calculation for Tax Proposal d.

For individuals earning more than \(10,000, they pay a lump-sum tax of \)10,000\(. Those with income below \)10,000 pay taxes equal to their income. The marginal tax rate is \(100\%\) for incomes below \(10,000 and \)0\%\( for incomes above \)10,000. #Phase 2: Calculating the Percentage of Income Paid in Taxes#
05

Calculating for Tax Proposal a.

With a pre-tax income of \(5,000, an individual would pay \)5,000 * 0.2 = \(1,000 in taxes. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \)\frac{1,000}{5,000} * 100 = 20\%\(. For an individual with a pre-tax income of \)40,000, they would pay \(40,000 * 0.2 = \)8,000 in taxes. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \(\frac{8,000}{40,000} * 100 = 20\%\). This tax is proportional.
06

Calculating for Tax Proposal b.

With a pre-tax income of \(5,000, an individual would pay no taxes, because the income is below \)10,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes is \(0\%\). For an individual with a pre-tax income of \(40,000, they would pay taxes on \)30,000 (income above \(10,000), which is \)30,000 * 0.2 = \(6,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \)\frac{6,000}{40,000} * 100 = 15\%$. This tax is progressive.
07

Calculating for Tax Proposal c.

With a pre-tax income of \(5,000, an individual would pay \)5,000 * 0.1 = \(500 in taxes. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \)\frac{500}{5,000} * 100 = 10\%\(. For an individual with a pre-tax income of \)40,000, they would pay taxes as follows: \(10,000 * 0.1 = \)1,000 for the first bracket, and \(30,000 * 0.3 = \)9,000 for the third bracket. The total taxes paid would be \(1,000 + \)9,000 = \(10,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \)\frac{10,000}{40,000} * 100 = 25\%$. This tax is progressive.
08

Calculating for Tax Proposal d.

With a pre-tax income of \(5,000, an individual would pay \)5,000 in taxes. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \(\frac{5,000}{5,000} * 100 = 100\%\). For an individual with a pre-tax income of \(40,000, they would pay a lump-sum tax of \)10,000. The percentage of income paid in taxes would be \(\frac{10,000}{40,000} * 100 = 25\%\). This tax is regressive.
09

Tax Policy with Worst Incentive Problems

Tax proposal d is likely to cause the worst incentive problems. For individuals earning below \(10,000, the tax rate is \)100\%\(, which might disincentivize them from working. On the other hand, people with income above \)10,000 have no marginal tax rate, incentivizing them to earn more without paying additional taxes. This might lead to work disincentives for low-income individuals and increased inequality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The state needs to raise money, and the governor has a choice of imposing an excise tax of the same amount on one of two previously untaxed goods: the state can tax sales of either restaurant meals or gasoline. Both the demand for and the supply of restaurant meals are more elastic than the demand for and the supply of gasoline. If the governor wants to minimize the deadweight loss caused by the tax, which good should be taxed? For each good, draw a diagram that illustrates the deadweight loss from taxation.

In Transylvania the basic income tax system is fairly simple. The first 40,000 sylvers (the official currency of Transylvania) earned each year are free of income tax. Any additional income is taxed at a rate of \(25 \% .\) In addition, every individual pays a social security tax, which is calculated as follows: all income up to 80,000 sylvers is taxed at an additional \(20 \%\), but there is no additional social security tax on income above 80,000 sylvers. a. Calculate the marginal tax rates (including income tax and social security tax) for Transylvanians with the following levels of income: 20,000 sylvers, 40,000 sylvers, and 80,000 sylvers. (Hint: You can calculate the marginal tax rate as the percentage of an additional 1 sylver in income that is taxed away.) b. Is the income tax in Transylvania progressive, regressive, or proportional? Is the social security tax progressive, regressive, or proportional? c. Which income group's incentives are most adversely affected by the combined income and social security tax systems?

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

You work for the Council of Economic Advisers, providing economic advice to the White House. The president wants to overhaul the income tax system and asks your advice. Suppose that the current income tax system consists of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income and that there is one person in the country who earns \(\$ 110\) million; everyone else earns less than \(\$ 100\) million. The president proposes a tax cut targeted at the very rich so that the new tax system would consist of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income up to \(\$ 100\) million and a marginal tax rate of \(0 \%\) (no tax) on income above \(\$ 100\) million. You are asked to evaluate this tax proposal. a. For incomes of \(\$ 100\) million or less, is this proposed tax system progressive, regressive, or proportional? For incomes of more than \(\$ 100\) million? Explain. b. Would this tax system create more or less tax revenue, other things equal? Is this tax system more or less efficient than the current tax system? Explain.

In the United States, each state government can impose its own excise tax on the sale of cigarettes. Suppose that in the state of North Texarkana, the state government imposes a tax of \(\$ 2.00\) per pack sold within the state. In contrast, the neighboring state of South Texarkana imposes no excise tax on cigarettes. Assume that in both states the pre-tax price of a pack of cigarettes is \(\$ 1.00 .\) Assume that the total cost to a resident of North Texarkana to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana is \(\$ 1.85\) per pack. (This includes the cost of time, gasoline, and so on.) Assume that the supply curve for cigarettes is neither perfectly elastic nor perfectly inelastic.a. Draw a diagram of the supply and demand curves for cigarettes in North Texarkana showing a situation in which it makes economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. b. Draw a corresponding diagram showing a situation in which it does not make economic sense for a North Texarkanan to smuggle a pack of cigarettes from South Texarkana to North Texarkana. Explain your diagram. c. Suppose the demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic. How high could the cost of smuggling a pack of cigarettes go until a North Texarkanan no longer found it profitable to smuggle? d. Still assume that demand for cigarettes in North Texarkana is perfectly inelastic and that all smokers in North Texarkana are smuggling their cigarettes at a cost of \(\$ 1.85\) per pack, so no tax is paid. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack? Suppose chip- embedded cigarette packaging makes it impossible to smuggle cigarettes across the state border. Is there any inefficiency in this situation? If so, how much per pack?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free