Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You have \(\$ 1,000\) that you can invest. If you buy Ford stock, you face the following returns and probabilities from holding the stock for one year: with a probability of 0.2 you will get \(\$ 1,500\); with a probability of 0.4 you will get \(\$ 1,100\); and with a probability of 0.4 you will get \(\$ 900 .\) If you put the money into the bank, in one year's time you will get \(\$ 1,100\) for certain. a. What is the expected value of your earnings from investing in Ford stock? b. Suppose you are risk-averse. Can we say for sure whether you will invest in Ford stock or put your money into the bank?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: For a risk-averse individual, they will prefer to put their money in the bank rather than investing in Ford stock. This is because the bank option provides a certain outcome of $1,100 while the investment has potential outcomes ranging from $900 to $1,500, despite the equal expected values for both options.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the expected value of the earnings from investing in Ford stock

To calculate the expected value, multiply the potential outcomes by their corresponding probabilities and sum the results. The expected value of the earnings from investing in Ford stock is: $$ E(Ford)=0.2(\$1,500)+0.4(\$1,100)+0.4(\$900) $$
02

Solve for the expected value

Calculate the expected value: $$ E(Ford)=0.2(\$1,500)+0.4(\$1,100)+0.4(\$900)=\$300+\$440+\$360=\$1,100 $$ So, the expected value of investing in Ford stock for one year is \(\$1,100\).
03

Compare the options

The expected value of investing in Ford stock (\$1,100) is the same as the certain outcome of putting the money in the bank (\$1,100). However, given risk aversion, an individual will generally prefer the option with a certain outcome over the one with uncertainty, even if expected values are equal.
04

Conclusion

For a risk-averse individual, we can say for sure that they will prefer to put their money in the bank rather than investing in Ford stock, because the bank option provides a certain outcome of \$1,100 while the expected value of investing in Ford stock is also \$1,100 but with potential outcomes ranging from \$900 to \$1,500.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Investment Risk
Investment risk refers to the possibility of achieving a different outcome from the expected one when investing. In the example of investing in Ford stock, there are various scenarios: making a return of $1,500, $1,100, or $900. Each scenario has a specific probability attached to it, highlighting the uncertain nature of investing in stocks. This variability in potential outcomes constitutes the investment risk.
  • Higher potential returns usually come with greater risk.
  • Investments with certain returns carry lower risk.
When evaluating investment opportunities, understanding the level of risk involved is crucial. It helps decide whether the potential rewards justify the uncertainty involved. In contrast, putting money in the bank typically represents low risk due to guaranteed returns.
Probability
Probability plays a significant role in calculating expected values and understanding potential outcomes of investments. In the given exercise, each potential outcome from investing in Ford stock has an associated probability:
  • 20% chance of earning $1,500
  • 40% chance of earning $1,100
  • 40% chance of earning $900
These probabilities help investors in computing the expected value of their investments. By multiplying each possible outcome by its probability and then summing those values, investors obtain a predicted average return, indicating what they might expect over many similar investments. Probability doesn't guarantee a particular outcome, but it helps gauge the likelihood of various results, allowing investors to make more informed decisions.
Risk Aversion
Risk aversion is a concept describing the preference for certainty over uncertainty. Individuals who are risk-averse prefer a certain gain over a gamble with a potentially higher payoff but with uncertainty. In this exercise, even though the expected value of investing in Ford stock matches the bank's guaranteed return of $1,100, a risk-averse person would likely choose the bank option.
  • Risk-averse individuals value predictability and security.
  • Ensuring a specific outcome can be more appealing than the potential for higher gains.
For a risk-averse individual, the possibility of lower returns (e.g., $900 from the stock investment) outweighs the opportunity for higher returns (e.g., $1,500). Therefore, despite the same expected value, the guarantee with the bank deposit is often more attractive to those who value stability and risk reduction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You have \(\$ 1,000\) that you can invest. If you buy General Motors stock, then, in one year's time: with a probability of 0.4 you will get \(\$ 1,600\); with a probability of 0.4 you will get \(\$ 1,100\); and with a probability of 0.2 you will get \(\$ 800\). If you put the money into the bank, in one year's time you will get \(\$ 1,100\) for certain. a. What is the expected value of your earnings from investing in General Motors stock? b. Suppose you prefer putting your money into the bank to investing it in General Motors stock. What does that tell us about your attitude to risk?

Suppose you have \(\$ 1,000\) that you can invest in Ted and Larry's Ice Cream Parlor and/or Ethel's House of Cocoa. The price of a share of stock in either company is \(\$ 100\). The fortunes of each company are closely linked to the weather. When it is warm, the value of Ted and Larry's stock rises to \(\$ 150\) but the value of Ethel's stock falls to \$60. When it is cold, the value of Ethel's stock rises to \(\$ 150\) but the value of Ted and Larry's stock falls to \(\$ 60\). There is an equal chance of the weather being warm or cold. a. If you invest all your money in Ted and Larry's, what is your expected stock value? What if you invest all your money in Ethel's? b. Suppose you diversify and invest half of your \(\$ 1,000\) in each company. How much will your total stock be worth if the weather is warm? What if it is cold? c. Suppose you are risk-averse. Would you prefer to put all your money in Ted and Larry's, as in part a? Or would you prefer to diversify, as in part b? Explain your reasoning.

Kory owns a house that is worth \(\$ 300,000 .\) If the house burns down, she loses all \(\$ 300,000\). If the house does not burn down, she loses nothing. Her house burns down with a probability of 0.02 . Kory is risk-averse. a. What would a fair insurance policy cost? b. Suppose an insurance company offers to insure her fully against the loss from the house burning down, at a premium of \(\$ 1,500\). Can you say for sure whether Kory will or will not take the insurance? c. Suppose an insurance company offers to insure her fully against the loss from the house burning down, at a premium of \(\$ 6,000\). Can you say for sure whether Kory will or will not take the insurance? d. Suppose that an insurance company offers to insure her fully against the loss from the house burning down, at a premium of \(\$ 9,000\). Can you say for sure whether Kory will or will not take the insurance?

Eva is risk-averse. Currently she has \(\$ 50,000\) to invest. She faces the following choice: she can invest in the stock of a dot-com company, or she can invest in IBM stock. If she invests in the dot-com company, then with probability 0.5 she will lose \(\$ 30,000\), but with probability 0.5 she will gain \(\$ 50,000\). If she invests in IBM stock, then with probability 0.5 she will lose only \(\$ 10,000,\) but with probability 0.5 she will gain only \(\$ 30,000\). Can you tell which investment she will prefer to make?

For each of the following situations, do the following: first describe whether it is a situation of moral hazard or of adverse selection. Then explain what inefficiency can arise from this situation and explain how the proposed solution reduces the inefficiency. a. When you buy a second-hand car, you do not know whether it is a lemon (low quality) or a plum (high quality), but the seller knows. A solution is for sellers to offer a warranty with the car that pays for repair costs. b. Some people are prone to see doctors unnecessarily for minor complaints like headaches, and health maintenance organizations do not know how urgently you need a doctor. A solution is for insurees to have to make a co-payment of a certain dollar amount (for example, \(\$ 10\) ) each time they visit a health care provider. All insurees are risk-averse. c. When airlines sell tickets, they do not know whether a buyer is a business traveler (who is willing to pay a lot for a seat) or a leisure traveler (who has a low willingness to pay). A solution for a profit-maximizing airline is to offer an expensive ticket that is very flexible (it allows date and route changes) and a cheap ticket that is very inflexible (it has to be booked in advance and cannot be changed). d. A company does not know whether workers on an assembly line work hard or whether they slack off. A solution is to pay the workers "piece rates," that is, pay them according to how much they have produced each day. All workers are risk-averse, but the company is not risk-neutral. e. When making a decision about hiring you, prospective employers do not know whether you are a productive or unproductive worker. A solution is for productive workers to provide potential employers with references from previous employers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free