Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One July, the United States sold aircraft worth \(\$ 1\) billion to China and bought aircraft worth only \(\$ 19,000\) from China. During the same month, however, the United States bought \(\$ 83\) million worth of men's trousers, slacks, and jeans from China but sold only \(\$ 8,000\) worth of trousers, slacks, and jeans to China. Using what you have learned about how trade is determined by comparative advantage, answer the following questions. a. Which country has the comparative advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans? b. Can you determine which country has the absolute advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The United States has a comparative advantage in aircraft production, while China has a comparative advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the trade of aircraft between United States and China

In July, the United States sold aircraft worth \(1\) billion to China, while China sold aircraft worth only \(19,000\) to the United States. This trade pattern suggests that the United States has a comparative advantage in aircraft production.
02

Analyze the trade of trousers, slacks, and jeans between United States and China

In the same month, the United States bought \(\$ 83\) million worth of men's trousers, slacks, and jeans from China, while China bought just \(\$ 8,000\) worth of these products from the United States. This trade pattern indicates that China has a comparative advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production. #b. Absolute advantage in aircraft production and trousers production# To determine absolute advantage, we would need information about the production capabilities of the two countries when using the same resources. Since the exercise does not provide such information, we cannot directly determine absolute advantage. However, based on the trade patterns, we can infer that the United States has an absolute advantage in aircraft production, as they sold dramatically higher quantities of aircraft to China than they imported. Similarly, we can infer that China has an absolute advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production because of the significant difference in the quantities traded.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Absolute Advantage
The concept of absolute advantage refers to the ability of a country to produce a good more efficiently than another country. In simpler terms, if a country can produce more of a product using fewer resources, it has an absolute advantage in producing that product. Understanding this concept requires comparing the output levels of different countries for the same product, assuming they use the same amount of resources.
In the context of the exercise, the United States sold significantly more aircraft to China than it bought from China. This suggests that the U.S. might have an absolute advantage in aircraft production. However, to determine absolute advantage unequivocally, specific data on resource usage and efficiency is necessary.
For trousers, slacks, and jeans, China exported much more to the U.S. than it imported. This trade pattern hints at China's potential absolute advantage in producing these items. Still, like before, without detailed production data, we can only make educated guesses.
International Trade
International trade involves the exchange of goods and services between countries. It allows nations to specialize in the production of goods where they have a comparative advantage while importing goods where other countries excel. This specialization helps improve global efficiency and can lead to lower prices and more variety for consumers.
In our scenario, the trade of aircraft and clothing between the U.S. and China illustrates international trade's fundamental principles. The U.S. exporting a substantial amount of aircraft to China showcases its focus on industries where it excels, while the significant import of clothing from China highlights the U.S.'s reliance on Chinese manufacturing expertise in the textile sector.
International trade is shaped by factors like resource distribution, technology levels, and economic policies. While each country aims to benefit from trade, it is essential to navigate these exchanges thoughtfully to ensure equitable trade relationships.
Trade Patterns
Trade patterns refer to the typical flow of goods and services in and out of a country. These patterns are influenced by each country's comparative and absolute advantages, affecting what they export and import. Observing these patterns can reveal economic strengths and weaknesses as well as the global positioning of a country in various industries.
In the exercise, the trade patterns between the U.S. and China highlight the contrast in industrial focus. The U.S. demonstrates a strong export pattern in aircraft, indicating a strength in high-tech, complex manufacturing. In contrast, China's robust export of clothing like trousers and jeans shows its dominance in the textile industry.
Such patterns are crucial for policy-making and economic planning, helping countries identify sectors that require development or can be harnessed for greater economic gain. By analyzing trade patterns, nations can better understand global market dynamics and adjust strategies accordingly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are the following statements true or false? Explain your answers. a. "When people must pay higher taxes on their wage earnings, it reduces their incentive to work" is a positive statement. b. "We should lower taxes to encourage more work" is a positive statement. c. Economics cannot always be used to completely decide what society ought to do. d. "The system of public education in this country generates greater benefits to society than the cost of running the system" is a normative statement. e. All disagreements among economists are generated by the media.

Evaluate the following statement: "It is easier to build an economic model that accurately reflects events that have already occurred than to build an economic model to forecast future events." Do you think this is true or not? Why? What does this imply about the difficulties of building good economic models?

Atlantis is a small, isolated island in the South Atlantic. The inhabitants grow potatoes and catch fish. The accompanying table shows the maximum annual output combinations of potatoes and fish that can be produced. Obviously, given their limited resources and available technology, as they use more of their resources for potato production, there are fewer resources available for catching fish. $$ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \begin{array}{c} \text { Maximum annual } \\ \text { output options } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of } \\ \text { potatoes (pounds) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of } \\ \text { fish (pounds) } \end{array} \\ \text { A } & 1,000 & 0 \\ \text { B } & 800 & 300 \\ \text { C } & 600 & 500 \\ \text { D } & 400 & 600 \\ \text { E } & 200 & 650 \\ \text { F } & 0 & 675 \end{array} $$ a. Draw a production possibility frontier with potatoes on the horizontal axis and fish on the vertical axis illustrating these options, showing points \(A-F\) b. Can Atlantis produce 500 pounds of fish and 800 pounds of potatoes? Explain. Where would this point lie relative to the production possibility frontier? c. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the annual output of potatoes from 600 to 800 pounds? d. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the annual output of potatoes from 200 to 400 pounds? e. Can you explain why the answers to parts \(\mathrm{c}\) and \(\mathrm{d}\) are not the same? What does this imply about the slope of the production possibility frontier?

In the ancient country of Roma, only two goods, spaghetti and meatballs, are produced. There are two tribes in Roma, the Tivoli and the Frivoli. By themselves, the Tivoli each month can produce either 30 pounds of spaghetti and no meatballs, or 50 pounds of meatballs and no spaghetti, or any combination in between. The Frivoli, by themselves, each month can produce 40 pounds of spaghetti and no meatballs, or 30 pounds of meatballs and no spaghetti, or any combination in between. a. Assume that all production possibility frontiers are straight lines. Draw one diagram showing the monthly production possibility frontier for the Tivoli and another showing the monthly production possibility frontier for the Frivoli. Show how you calculated them. b. Which tribe has the comparative advantage in spaghetti production? In meatball production? In A.D. 100 the Frivoli discover a new technique for making meatballs that doubles the quantity of meatballs they can produce each month. c. Draw the new monthly production possibility frontier for the Frivoli. d. After the innovation, which tribe now has an absolute advantage in producing meatballs? In producing spaghetti? Which has the comparative advantage in meatball production? In spaghetti production?

You are in charge of allocating residents to your dormitory's baseball and basketball teams. You are down to the last four people, two of whom must be allocated to baseball and two to basketball. The accompanying table gives each person's batting average and freethrow average. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} \text { Name } & \text { Batting average } & \text { Free-throw average } \\ \text { Kelley } & 70 \% & 60 \% \\ \text { Jackie } & 50 \% & 50 \% \\ \text { Curt } & 10 \% & 30 \% \\ \text { Gerry } & 80 \% & 70 \% \end{array} $$ a. Explain how you would use the concept of comparative advantage to allocate the players. Begin by establishing each player's opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average. b. Why is it likely that the other basketball players will be unhappy about this arrangement but the other baseball players will be satisfied? Nonetheless, why would an economist say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for your dormitory's sports teams?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free