Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A residential community has 100 residents who are concerned about security. The accompanying table gives the total cost of hiring a 24 -hour security service as well as each individual resident's total benefit. \begin{tabular}{c|c|c} Quantity of security guards & Total cost & Total individual benefit to each resident \\ \hline 0 & \(\$ 0\) & \(\$ 0\) \\\ 1 & 150 & 10 \\\ 2 & 300 & 16 \\\ 3 & 450 & 18 \\\ 4 & 600 & 19 \end{tabular} a. Explain why the security service is a public good for the residents of the community. b. Calculate the marginal cost, the individual marginal benefit for each resident, and the marginal social benefit. c. If an individual resident were to decide about hiring and paying for security guards on his or her own, how many guards would that resident hire? d. If the residents act together, how many security guards will they hire?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: If the residents act together, they would hire 3 security guards.

Step by step solution

01

a. Identifying a public good

The security service is a public good for the residents of the community because it has two main properties: non-excludability and non-rivalry. Non-excludability means that once the good is provided, no one within the community can be excluded from using or benefiting from it. In this case, once the security service is hired, its protection covers all the residents without excluding anyone due to their unwillingness or inability to pay for the service. Non-rivalry means that one person's consumption of the good does not diminish the amount available for others. In this context, one resident’s benefit from the presence of a security guard does not reduce the benefit for other residents.
02

b. Calculating the marginal values

To find the marginal cost, individual marginal benefit, and marginal social benefit, we need to determine the difference in costs and benefits between each subsequent increase in the number of security guards. Marginal Cost (MC) = Change in Total Cost / Change in Quantity of Security Guards Individual Marginal Benefit (IMB) = Change in Total Individual Benefit / Change in Quantity of Security Guards Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) = Individual Marginal Benefit * Number of Residents Here is the table with calculated values for each additional security guard: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c} Quantity of security guards & Total cost & Total individual benefit & MC & IMB & MSB \\\ \hline 0 & \(\$ 0\) & \(\$ 0\) & - & - & - \\\ 1 & 150 & 10 & 150 & 10 & 1000 \\\ 2 & 300 & 16 & 150 & 6 & 600 \\\ 3 & 450 & 18 & 150 & 2 & 200 \\\ 4 & 600 & 19 & 150 & 1 & 100 \end{tabular}
03

c. Individual resident decision

An individual resident would decide to hire and pay for security guards on his or her own by comparing the individual marginal benefit (IMB) with the marginal cost (MC) for each quantity of security guards. The resident would hire a guard if the IMB is greater than or equal to the MC. In the table above, we can see that: - For the first security guard, IMB (10) > MC (150), so the resident would not hire a guard. - For the second security guard, IMB (6) > MC (150), so the resident would not hire a guard. - For the third security guard, IMB (2) > MC (150), so the resident would not hire a guard. - For the fourth security guard, IMB (1) > MC (150), so the resident would not hire a guard. In conclusion, if an individual resident were to decide about hiring and paying for security guards on his or her own, that resident would not hire any security guards.
04

d. Residents acting together

When the residents act together, they will compare the marginal social benefit (MSB) with the marginal cost (MC) for each quantity of security guards. They will hire a guard if the MSB is greater than or equal to the MC. In the table above, we can see that: - For the first security guard, MSB (1000) > MC (150), so the residents would hire a guard. - For the second security guard, MSB (600) > MC (150), so the residents would hire a guard. - For the third security guard, MSB (200) > MC (150), so the residents would hire a guard. - For the fourth security guard, MSB (100) < MC (150), so the residents would not hire a guard. If the residents act together, they would hire 3 security guards.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The government is involved in providing many goods and services. For each of the goods or services listed, determine whether it is rival or nonrival in consumption and whether it is excludable or nonexcludable. What type of good is it? Without government involvement, would the quantity provided be efficient, inefficiently low, or inefficiently high? a. Street signs b. Amtrak rail service c. Regulations limiting pollution d. A congested interstate highway without tolls e. A lighthouse on the coast

Prior to 2003 , the city of London was often one big parking lot. Traffic jams were common, and it could take hours to travel a couple of miles. Each additional commuter contributed to the congestion, which can be measured by the total number of cars on London roads. Although each commuter suffered by spending valuable time in traffic, none of them paid for the inconvenience they caused others. The total cost of travel includes the opportunity cost of time spent in traffic and any fees levied by London authorities. a. Draw a graph illustrating the overuse of London roads, assuming that there is no fee to enter London in a vehicle and that roads are a common resource. Put the cost of travel on the vertical axis and the quantity of cars on the horizontal axis. Draw typical demand, individual marginal cost \((M C),\) and marginal social cost \((M S C)\) curves and label the equilibrium point. (Hint: The marginal cost takes into account the opportunity cost of spending time on the road for individual drivers but not the inconvenience they cause to others.) b. In February \(2003,\) the city of London began charging a \(£ 5\) congestion fee on all vehicles traveling in central London. Illustrate the effects of this congestion charge on your graph and label the new equilibrium point. Assume the new equilibrium point is not optimally set (that is, assume that the \(£ 5\) charge is too low relative to what would be efficient). c. The congestion fee was raised to \(£ 9\) in January 2011 . Illustrate the new equilibrium point on your graph, assuming the new charge is now optimally set.

The accompanying table shows six consumers' willingness to pay (his or her individual marginal benefit) for one MP3 file copy of a Jay-Z album. The marginal cost of making the file accessible to one additional consumer is constant, at zero. \begin{tabular}{l|c} Consumer & Individual marginal benefit \\\ Adriana & \(\$ 2\) \\\ Bhagesh & 15 \\\ Chizuko & 1 \\\ Denzel & 10 \\\ Emma & 5 \\\ Frank & 4 \end{tabular} a. What would be the efficient price to charge for a download of the file? b. All six consumers are able to download the file for free from a file- sharing service, Pantster. Which consumers will download the file? What will be the total consumer surplus to those consumers? c. Pantster is shut down for copyright law infringement. In order to download the file, consumers now have to pay \(\$ 4.99\) at a commercial music site. Which consumers will download the file? What will be the total consumer surplus to those consumers? How much producer surplus accrues to the commercial music site? What is the total surplus? What is the deadweight loss from the new pricing policy?

Software has historically been an artificially scarce good-it is nonrival because the cost of replication is negligible once the investment to write the code is made, but software companies make it excludable by charging for user licenses. But then open-source software emerged, most of which is free to download and can be modified and maintained by anyone. a. Discuss the free-rider problem that might exist in the development of open- source software. What effect might this have on quality? Why does this problem not exist for proprietary software, such as the products of a company like Microsoft or Adobe? b. Some argue that open-source software serves an unsatisfied market demand that proprietary software ignores. Draw a typical diagram that illustrates how proprietary software may be underproduced. Put the price and marginal cost of software on the vertical axis and the quantity of software on the horizontal axis. Draw a typical demand curve and a marginal cost curve \((M C)\) that is always equal to zero. Assume that the software company charges a positive price, \(P,\) for the software. Label the equilibrium point and the efficient point.

Butchart Gardens is a very large garden in Victoria, British Columbia, renowned for its beautiful plants. It is so large that it could hold many times more visitors than currently visit it. The garden charges an admission fee of approximately \(\$ 30 .\) At this price, 1,000 people visit the garden each day. If admission were free, 2,000 people would visit each day. a. Are visits to Butchart Gardens excludable or nonexcludable? Are they rival in consumption or nonrival? What type of good is it? b. In a diagram, illustrate the demand curve for visits to Butchart Gardens. Indicate the situation when Butchart Gardens charges an admission fee of $\$ 30 .$ Also indicate the situation when Butchart Gardens charges no admission fee. c. Illustrate the deadweight loss from charging a \(\$ 30\) admission fee. Explain why charging a \(\$ 30\) admission fee is inefficient.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free