Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The city of Falls Church, Virginia, subsidizes the planting of trees in homeowners' front yards when they are within 15 feet of the street. a. Using concepts in the chapter, explain why a municipality would subsidize planting trees on private property, but near the street. b. Draw a diagram similar to Figure \(16-4\) that shows the marginal social benefit, the marginal social cost, and the optimal Pigouvian subsidy on planting trees.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The municipality provides subsidies for planting trees on private property near the street to internalize the positive externalities associated with tree planting, such as cleaner air, aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, and potentially higher property values. These benefits are experienced by the entire community, not just the individual homeowner. The optimal Pigouvian subsidy should be equal to the difference between the marginal social benefit (MSB) and the marginal social cost (MSC) at the socially optimal quantity of trees (Qs), which can be determined by the intersection point of the new MSC curve and the MSB curve. This subsidy encourages homeowners to plant more trees, shifting the equilibrium from the private market quantity (Qp) to the socially optimal quantity (Qs), resulting in greater benefits to the entire community.

Step by step solution

01

In this situation, the municipality is providing subsidies for planting trees in the front yards, close to the street. We must understand that planting trees have positive externalities, which means that there are benefits experienced by third parties that are not directly involved in the transaction. The municipality wants to incentivize homeowners to plant more trees because this leads to positive externalities like cleaner air, aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, and potentially higher property values. #Step_2# - Analyzing the externalities

In the case of planting trees, the positive externalities include the provision of cleaner air, a pleasant environment, and increased property values. These benefits are not limited to the individual homeowner but are experienced by the entire community living in the area. The municipality would like to promote these benefits and internalize the positive externalities by providing a subsidy. #Step_3# - Drawing the diagram
02

In this step, we will draw a diagram similar to Figure 16-4, showing the marginal social benefit (MSB), marginal social cost (MSC), and the optimal Pigouvian subsidy for planting trees. On the X-axis, we represent the quantity of trees planted, and on the Y-axis, we represent the cost and benefit associated with tree planting. There are two main curves – MSB and MSC. MSB is upward sloping, which indicates that the more trees planted, the higher the benefit to society. MSC curve represents the cost involved in planting more trees and is also upward sloping. When there is no subsidy, the intersection point of these two curves determines the private market equilibrium (Qp). To internalize the positive externalities, a subsidy should be introduced which lowers the MSC curve. The optimal Pigouvian subsidy should be equal to the difference between MSB and MSC at the socially optimal quantity of trees (Qs). This can be determined by the intersection point of the new MSC curve with the MSB curve. #Step_4# - Explaining the diagram

The diagram we just drew shows the optimal Pigouvian subsidy provided by the municipality for planting trees. This subsidy encourages homeowners to plant more trees, shifting the equilibrium from the private market quantity (Qp) to the socially optimal quantity (Qs). This leads to an increase in the overall quantity of trees planted near the street, providing greater benefits to the entire community, including cleaner air, improved aesthetics, and potentially higher property values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fishing for sablefish has been so intensive that sablefish were threatened with extinction. After several years of banning such fishing, the government is now proposing to introduce tradable vouchers, each of which entitles its holder to a catch of a certain size. Explain how uncontrolled fishing generates a negative externality and how the voucher scheme may overcome the inefficiency created by this externality.

a. EAuction and EMarketplace are two competing internet auction sites, where buyers and sellers transact goods. Each auction site earns money by charging sellers for listing their goods. EAuction has decided to eliminate fees for the first transaction for sellers that are new to its site. Explain why this is likely to be a good strategy for EAuction in its competition with EMarketplace. b. EMarketplace complained to the Justice Department that EAuction's practice of eliminating fees for new sellers was anti-competitive and would lead to monopolization of the internet auction industry. Is EMarketplace correct? How should the Justice Department respond? c. EAuction stopped its practice of eliminating fees for new sellers. But since it provided much better technical service than its rival, EMarketplace, buyers and sellers came to prefer EAuction. Eventually, EMarketplace closed down, leaving EAuction as a monopolist. Should the Justice Department intervene to break EAuction into two companies? Explain. d. EAuction is now a monopolist in the internet auction industry. It also owns a site that handles payments over the internet, called PayForIt. It is competing with another internet payment site, called PayBuddy. EAuction has now stipulated that any transaction on its auction site must use PayForIt, rather than PayBuddy, for the payment. Should the Justice Department intervene? Explain.

Many dairy farmers in California are adopting a new technology that allows them to produce their own electricity from methane gas captured from animal waste. (One cow can produce up to 2 kilowatts a day.) This practice reduces the amount of methane gas released into the atmosphere. In addition to reducing their own utility bills, the farmers are allowed to sell any electricity they produce at favorable rates. a. Explain how the ability to earn money from capturing and transforming methane gas behaves like a Pigouvian tax on methane gas pollution and can lead dairy farmers to emit the efficient amount of methane gas pollution. b. Suppose some dairy farmers have lower costs of transforming methane into electricity than others. Explain how this system of capturing and selling methane gas leads to an efficient allocation of emissions reduction among farmers.

According to a report from the U.S. Census Bureau, "the average [lifetime] earnings of a full-time, year round worker with a high school education are about \(\$ 1.2\) million compared with \(\$ 2.1\) million for a college graduate." This indicates that there is a considerable benefit to a graduate from investing in his or her own education. Tuition at most state universities covers only about two-thirds to three-quarters of the cost, so the state applies a Pigouvian subsidy to college education. If a Pigouvian subsidy is appropriate, is the externality created by a college education a positive or a negative externality? What does this imply about the differences between the costs and benefits to students compared to social costs and benefits? What are some reasons for the differences?

What type of externality (positive or negative) is present in each of the following examples? Is the marginal social benefit of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal benefit to the individual? Is the marginal social cost of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal cost to the individual? Without intervention, will there be too little or too much (relative to what would be socially optimal) of this activity? a. Mr. Chau plants lots of colorful flowers in his front yard. b. Your next-door neighbor likes to build bonfires in his backyard, and sparks often drift onto your house. c. Maija, who lives next to an apple orchard, decides to keep bees to produce honey. d. Justine buys a large SUV that consumes a lot of gasoline.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free