Chapter 9: Problem 2
Use the following data to work Problems 1 and 2 . Sara's income is \(\$ 12\) a week. The price of popcorn is \(\$ 3\) a bag, and the price of a smoothie is \(\$ 3\). Calculate the equation for Sara's budget line (with bags of popcorn on the left side). Draw a graph of Sara's budget line with the quantity of smoothies on the \(x\) -axis. What is the slope of Sara's budget line? What determines its value?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Title - Understand the Budget Equation
Title - Formulate the Budget Equation
Title - Simplify the Equation
Title - Determine the Budget Line Graph Intercepts
Title - Graph the Budget Line
Title - Calculate the Slope of the Budget Line
Title - Interpret the Slope
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Budget Constraint
In Sara's case, her budget is \(12 per week, with popcorn and smoothies costing \)3 each. The budget equation, representing her budget constraint, is derived as follows:
Let's denote the quantity of popcorn as P and the quantity of smoothies as S. The equation will then be: \[ 3P + 3S = 12 \]
To simplify, we divide by 3: \[ P + S = 4 \]
This equation tells us that the total quantity of these goods she can buy should sum up to 4. When represented graphically, any point on this line shows a feasible combination of the two goods within her budget.
Trade-offs
For every extra bag of popcorn Sara wants to buy, she must give up one smoothie. This is seen clearly in the simplified budget line equation \( P + S = 4 \). The coefficient ratios indicate that one good exchanges directly for the other at a 1:1 rate.
Understanding trade-offs helps Sara make informed choices about how to allocate her limited income effectively. For instance:
- If she buys 2 bags of popcorn, she can afford only 2 smoothies (2 popcorn bags + 2 smoothies = 4).
- If she chooses 3 smoothies, she can only buy 1 bag of popcorn (1 popcorn bag + 3 smoothies = 4).
Consumer Choice
When making her decision, Sara must consider her preferences and the trade-offs she faces. She might prefer smoothies over popcorn or vice versa, which influences her purchase choices.
A graphical representation aids in visualizing these choices. The budget line on the graph shows the possible combinations of popcorn and smoothies Sara can purchase. Any point on this line is a potential choice she can make, staying within her budget. Thus:
- If Sara is located anywhere on the budget line, she is maximizing her consumption without exceeding her budget.
- Points inside the budget line mean Sara is under-spending and can afford more.
- Points outside the budget line are unattainable as they exceed her budget.
Slope of Budget Line
In Sara's case, taking the general form of a budget line \( P + S = 4 \), we can derive the slope by considering the rate of substitution between the two goods.
The slope is calculated as the change in the quantity of popcorn (\Delta P ) over the change in the quantity of smoothies (\Delta S ). Thus:
\[ \text{slope} = \frac{\text{change in popcorn (P)}}{\text{change in smoothies (S)}} = \frac{-4}{4} = -1 \]
This -1 slope indicates that for every additional smoothie Sara buys, she must give up one bag of popcorn. Its value depends on the price ratio of the two goods. Here, each good costing \$3 ensures a 1-to-1 trade-off.
A negative slope is natural, reflecting that increasing one good decreases the other due to limited resources. Understanding this helps consumers, like Sara, anticipate how changes in prices or income affect their ability to purchase goods.