Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Shelly, a homemaker, spends \(\$ 70\) twice a year on 10 grams of saffron and \(\$ 140\) a year on 28,000 gallons of tap water. a. Out of saffron and water, which is more valuable to Shelly? b. Explain how Shelly's expenditure on saffron and water illustrates the paradox of value.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Saffron is more valuable to Shelly. The paradox of value shows that essentials like water cost less despite high utility compared to non-essentials like saffron which cost more.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Annual Expenditure on Saffron

Shelly spends \(\$ 70\) twice a year on saffron. To find the annual expenditure, multiply \(\$ 70\) by 2.\[\$70 \times 2 = \$140\]So, annually Shelly spends \(\$ 140\) on saffron.
02

Calculate the Cost Per Gram of Saffron

Shelly buys 10 grams of saffron for \(\$ 70\). To find the cost per gram, divide \(\$ 70\) by 10.\[\$70 \div 10 = \$7 \text{per gram}\]Thus, saffron costs \(\$ 7\) per gram.
03

Calculate the Cost Per Gallon of Water

Shelly spends \(\$ 140\) annually on 28,000 gallons of tap water. To find the cost per gallon, divide \(\$ 140\) by 28,000.\[\$140 \div 28,000 = 0.005 \text{per gallon}\]Thus, water costs \(0.005\) per gallon.
04

Compare the Value of Saffron and Water

Comparing the costs calculated, saffron costs \(\$ 7\) per gram versus water's \(0.005\) per gallon. Hence, per unit cost, saffron is more valuable to Shelly than water.
05

Explain the Paradox of Value

The paradox of value, also known as the diamond-water paradox, observes that necessities like water (having high utility) are cheaper than luxuries like saffron (having low utility). Shelly's expenditure showcases this as she spends much less per gallon on water, a necessity, than on saffron, a luxury.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Value Comparison
Value comparison is the process of comparing the worth or cost of different items. In Shelly's case, she spends \(\text{\LaTeX\textbackslash\)\text{{\$140\}} annually on saffron and \(\text{\LaTeX\textbackslash\)\text{{\$140\}} annually on water. However, a closer look at the cost per unit reveals a significant difference. Each gram of saffron costs her \(\text{\LaTeX\textbackslash\)\text{{\$7\}} while each gallon of water costs \(\text{\LaTeX\textbackslash\)\text{{\0.005\}}. This comparison shows that saffron is much more costly per unit than water, even though the overall annual expenditure is the same.
Utility
Utility refers to the satisfaction or benefit derived from consuming a good or service. Water has high utility because it is essential for survival, while saffron has lower utility as it is a luxury spice. Despite its high utility, water is cheaper per unit than saffron. Therefore, utility does not always directly correlate with the monetary value of an item. Shelly benefits greatly from the large amount of water she consumes, even though it costs very little per gallon.
Cost Analysis
Cost analysis involves examining the cost of different goods and services to understand their value and impact on budget. For Shelly, spending \(\text{\LaTeX\textbackslash\)\text{{\$140\}} annually on water for 28,000 gallons results in a minimal cost per unit, making it affordable. Conversely, saffron, costing \(\text{\textbackslash\)\text{{\$7\}} per gram, represents a more considerable expense per unit. This type of analysis helps in understanding how much one is paying for the utility each item provides and making informed financial decisions.
Economic Paradox
The economic paradox, particularly the paradox of value, demonstrates why some essential goods are inexpensive while luxuries are costly. Known as the diamond-water paradox, it highlights that necessities like water, despite their high utility, are cheaper per unit compared to non-essentials like diamonds or saffron with lower utility. Shelly's spending pattern exemplifies this paradox as she pays considerably less per gallon for water, a necessity, than per gram of saffron, a luxury.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A new study by economists Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson has cast doubt on the credibility of the Easterlin paradox, which claims that higher incomes do not necessarily make people happier. The new study states that people do report more happiness and satisfaction as they grow richer. Moving from rich to richer seems to raise happiness just as much as moving from poor to less poor. Source: The Economist, May 2,2013 According to the news clip: a. How does moving from rich to richer influence total utility? b. How do total utility and marginal utility from consumption change over time?

Baseball and gluttony, two of America's favorite pastimes, are merging, with Major League Baseball stadiums offering all-you-can-eat seats. Some fans try to "set personal records" during their first game, but by the third time in such seats they eat normally. What conflict might exist between utility maximization and setting "personal records" for eating? What does the fact that fans eat less at subsequent games indicate about their marginal utility from ballpark food as they consume more?

Five Signs You Have Too Much Money When a bottle of water costs \(\$ 38,\) it's hard not to agree that bottled water is a fool's drink. The drink of choice among image-conscious status seekers and high-end tee-totalers in L.A. is Bling \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O} .\) It's not the water that accounts for the cost of the \(\$ 38,\) but the "limited edition" bottle decked out in Swarovski crystals. a. Assuming that the price of a bottle of Bling \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) is \(\$ 38\) in all the major U.S. cities, what might its popularity in Los Angeles reveal about consumers' incomes or preferences in Los Angeles relative to other major U.S. cities? b. Why might the marginal utility from a bottle of Bling \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) decrease more rapidly than the marginal utility from ordinary bottled water?

Katy has made her best affordable choice of noodles and iced tea. She spends all of her income on 15 packets of instant noodles at \(\$ 3\) each and 30 cups of iced tea at \(\$ 2\) each. Now the price of a packet of noodles rises to \(\$ 3.50\) per packet and the price of iced tea falls to \(\$ 1.75\) a cup. a. Will Katy now be able to consume 15 packets of instant noodles and 30 cups of iced tea? b. If Katy changes the quantities she buys, will she buy more or fewer packets of instant noodles? Explain your answer.

Joy goes bowling once and ice skating twice a month when he has \(\$ 20\) to spend on these activities. A visit to the bowling alley costs \(\$ 10,\) and an ice skating ticket costs \(\$ 5 .\) Draw Joy's budget line. If the price of an ice skating ticket falls to \(\$ 4,\) describe how Joy's consumption possibilities change.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free