Chapter 30: Problem 27
In New York Times articles and in blogs, economists Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz say there is a need for more fiscal stimulus in both the United States and Europe despite the large federal budget deficit and large deficits in some European countries. a. Do you agree with Krugman and Stiglitz? Why? b. What are the dangers of not engaging in further fiscal stimulus? c. What are the dangers of embarking on further fiscal stimulus when the budget is in deficit?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Understanding the Context
Formulating Your Agreement or Disagreement
Evaluating the Need for Fiscal Stimulus
Identifying the Risks of Not Using Fiscal Stimulus
Assessing the Risks of Fiscal Stimulus During Deficit
Drawing a Conclusion
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Paul Krugman
He often uses historical examples, like the Great Depression, to show that government intervention helped pull economies out of severe recessions.
Krugman's viewpoint is that the benefits of fiscal stimulus outweigh the risks, as it can lead to reduced unemployment and faster economic growth.
Joseph Stiglitz
Stiglitz argues that fiscal stimulus helps by putting money into the hands of consumers and businesses, which increases overall demand.
He also emphasizes that government spending should focus on long-term investments, such as infrastructure and education, which can yield benefits well into the future.
Federal Budget Deficit
However, proponents like Krugman and Stiglitz argue that during economic downturns, the benefits of stimulating the economy and creating jobs outweigh the risks of increasing the deficit.
They suggest that once the economy recovers, measures can be taken to reduce the deficit.
Economic Recovery
Fiscal stimulus can play a critical role in accelerating economic recovery by boosting demand through government spending.
However, it’s important to balance short-term recovery efforts with long-term financial health to ensure sustainable growth.
Unemployment Rates
Proponents of fiscal stimulus, such as Krugman and Stiglitz, argue that increasing government spending can create jobs and reduce unemployment.
By investing in public projects and services, the government can directly and indirectly generate employment, helping to lower the unemployment rate and stimulate economic activity.
Austerity Measures
Critics argue that during a recession, austerity measures can lead to higher unemployment rates and economic stagnation.
Both Krugman and Stiglitz believe that austerity is counterproductive during economic crises and advocate for fiscal stimulus instead.
National Debt
Critics of fiscal stimulus worry that increasing government spending during times of deficit will raise the national debt to unsustainable levels. However, Krugman and Stiglitz suggest that targeted, well-planned fiscal stimulus can foster economic growth, making it easier to manage debt in the long run.
The key is finding a balance between stimulating the economy and maintaining fiscal responsibility.
Economic Growth
Fiscal stimulus can accelerate economic growth by injecting money into the economy and boosting consumer and business spending.
According to Krugman and Stiglitz, during times of economic stagnation, government intervention is necessary to spur growth and pull the economy out of recession.
They argue that higher economic growth can help reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio, making fiscal stimulus a worthwhile strategy.