Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Poor India Makes Millionaires at Fastest Pace India, with the world's largest population of poor people, created millionaires at the fastest pace in the world in \(2007 .\) India added another 23,000 more millionaires in 2007 to its 2006 tally of 100,000 millionaires measured in dollars. That is 1 millionaire for about 7,000 people living on less than \(\$ 2\) a day. a. Why might real GDP per person misrepresent the standard of living of the average Indian? b. Why might \(\$ 2\) a day underestimate the standard of living of the poorest Indians?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Real GDP per person overlooks income disparity. $2 a day may underestimate the standard of living due to higher local purchasing power in India.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Real GDP Per Person

Real GDP per person is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country in a year, divided by the total population. It is often used as a measure of a country's economic well-being.
02

Consider Wealth Distribution

Real GDP per person does not account for how wealth is distributed among the population. In India, a large portion of wealth can be concentrated among a small number of millionaires, causing the average GDP per person to appear higher than it is for the majority of the population.
03

Explain Standard of Living

The standard of living refers to the level of wealth, comfort, material goods, and necessities available to a certain socioeconomic class or geographic area. In India, despite a high GDP per person, the standard of living for the average citizen might still be low due to income disparity.
04

Consider Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

The \(2 a day figure might underestimate the standard of living because it does not consider local purchasing power. In India, \)2 might be worth more and can buy more goods and services than in other countries, thus providing a slightly better standard of living than the nominal amount suggests.
05

Use Local Economic Indicators

Using local economic indicators such as access to healthcare, education, and housing can give a clearer picture of the standard of living, as these factors directly affect the quality of life and may vary significantly from GDP per person or nominal income figures.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Real GDP per person
Real GDP per person is an economic measure that calculates the total economic output of a country, divided by its population. It is a standard way to gauge the economic wellbeing of a country. However, this measure can sometimes misrepresent the actual standard of living for the average citizen. For instance, in India, despite a high real GDP per person, many individuals live below the poverty line.
GDP per person does not account for who holds that wealth. A high GDP per person might suggest a wealthy society, but if wealth is concentrated among a small elite, the average person might still experience low living standards.
Wealth Distribution
Wealth distribution describes how wealth is shared among the population within a country. In India, while the number of millionaires is increasing rapidly, a significant portion of the population lives in poverty.
Even if a country's overall wealth is growing, it matters how that wealth is distributed. If the wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few, a high GDP per person won't translate into higher living standards for the majority.
In fact, widespread income inequality can contribute to social and economic problems, even if average income figures appear to be rising.
Income Disparity
Income disparity, or income inequality, refers to the uneven distribution of income across various participants in an economy. In India, despite rapid growth in the number of millionaires, income disparity remains a significant issue.
This disparity can lead to large segments of the population experiencing little to no economic gain, even when the country's overall economy is growing. Such inequality impacts everyday life, affecting access to education, healthcare, and basic necessities.
It's essential to address income disparity to improve the average standard of living and economic stability.
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is an economic theory that compares different countries' currencies through a 'basket of goods' approach. In simpler terms, it lets us understand what money can actually buy in different places.
For instance, living on \(2 a day in India might be very different from living on \)2 a day in the United States. When we look at local purchasing power, even small amounts of money can sometimes buy more goods and services in countries like India.
This means that though someone earns $2 a day, the actual value of what they can purchase could be greater than the nominal amount suggests, allowing for a better standard of living than the raw numbers indicate.
Local Economic Indicators
Local economic indicators offer insights into the well-being of the population, reflecting factors beyond just income. Important indicators include access to healthcare, education, housing, and employment opportunities.
In India, these indicators provide a more comprehensive picture of the standard of living. For example, while GDP per person might provide one view, access to clean water, quality education, and healthcare can significantly impact daily life and well-being.
Evaluating these local economic indicators helps to understand the overall quality of life experienced by the population, giving a clearer image than income figures alone.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Boeing is producing some components of its new 787 Dreamliner in Japan and is assembling it in the United States. Much of the first year's production will be sold to ANA (All Nippon Airways), a Japanese airline. Explain how Boeing's activities and its transactions affect U.S. and Japanese GDP.

Use the following table to work out in which year the U.S. standard of living (i) increases and (ii) decreases. Explain your answer. $$\begin{array}{lcc} \text { Year } & \text { Real GDP } & \text { Population } \\ \hline 2006 & \$ 13.0 \text { trillion } & 300 \text { million } \\ 2007 & \$ 13.2 \text { trillion } & 302 \text { million } \\ 2008 & \$ 13.2 \text { trillion } & 304 \text { million } \\ 2009 & \$ 12.8 \text { trillion } & 307 \text { million } \end{array}$$

Boeing is producing some components of its new 787 Dreamliner in Japan and is assembling it in the United States. Much of the first year's production will be sold to ANA (All Nippon Airways), a Japanese airline. Explain how ANA's activities and its transactions affect U.S. and Japanese GDP.

Tropical Republic produces only bananas and coconuts. The base year is 2013 , and the table gives the quantities produced and the market prices. $$\begin{array}{lcc} \text { Quantities } & 2013 & 2014 \\ \hline \text { Bananas } & 800 \text { bunches } & 900 \text { bunches } \\ \text { Coconuts } & 400 \text { bunches } & 500 \text { bunches } \\ \text { Prices } & 2013 & 2014 \\ \hline \text { Bananas } & \$ 2 \text { a bunch } & \$ 4 \text { a bunch } \\ \text { Coconuts } & \$ 10 \text { a bunch } & \$ 5 \text { a bunch } \end{array}$$ Calculate nominal GDP in 2013 and 2014

$$\begin{array}{lcc} \text { Quantities } & 2012 & 2013 \\ \hline \text { Apples } & 60 & 160 \\ \text { Oranges } & 80 & 220 \\ \text { Prices } & 2012 & 2013 \\ \hline \text { Apples } & \$ 0.50 & \$ 1.00 \\ \text { Oranges } & \$ 0.25 & \$ 2.00 \end{array}$$ Calculate real GDP in 2012 and 2013 expressed in base-year prices.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free