Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the following news clip to work. Bud and Wise are the only two producers of aniseed beer, a New Age product designed to displace root beer. Bud and Wise are trying to figure out how much of this new beer to produce. They know (i) If they both produce 10,000 gallons a day, they will make the maximum attainable joint economic profit of \(\$ 200,000\) a day, or \(\$ 100,000\) a day each. (ii) If either firm produces 20,000 gallons a day while the other produces 10,000 gallons a day, the one that produces 20,000 gallons will make an economic profit of \(\$ 150,000\) and the other will incur an economic loss of \(\$ 50,000\). (iii) If both produce 20,000 gallons a day, each firm will make zero economic profit. Find the Nash equilibrium of the game that Bud and Wise play.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Nash equilibrium is for both Bud and Wise to produce 20,000 gallons each.

Step by step solution

01

Understand What Nash Equilibrium Is

Nash equilibrium occurs when no player can benefit by changing their strategy while the other player keeps their strategy unchanged. Both players choose strategies that are best responses to each other.
02

Identify the Payoffs for Each Strategy

The payoffs for each firm are given based on their production choices. We have the following payoff matrix: - If both produce 10,000 gallons: Both earn \( 100,000 \) each. - If Bud produces 20,000 gallons and Wise produces 10,000 gallons: Bud earns \( 150,000 \) and Wise incurs a loss of \( 50,000 \). - If Bud produces 10,000 gallons and Wise produces 20,000 gallons: Bud incurs a loss of \( 50,000 \) and Wise earns \( 150,000 \). - If both produce 20,000 gallons: Both earn zero profit.
03

Evaluate Each Firm’s Best Response

For Bud and Wise: - If Wise produces 10,000 gallons, Bud would be tempted to produce 20,000 gallons to earn \( 150,000 \) rather than \( 100,000 \). - If Wise produces 20,000 gallons, Bud would produce 20,000 gallons to avoid a loss and break even.Symmetrically for Wise: - If Bud produces 10,000 gallons, Wise would produce 20,000 gallons to earn \( 150,000 \) instead of \( 100,000 \). - If Bud produces 20,000 gallons, Wise would also produce 20,000 gallons to avoid a loss and break even.
04

Find the Nash Equilibrium

Both Bud and Wise have the incentive to produce 20,000 gallons regardless of the other's choice to avoid incurring losses or earning less. When both produce 20,000 gallons, neither can improve their payoff by changing their production, as changing would lead to a loss or zero profit. Therefore, the strategy (20,000 gallons, 20,000 gallons) is the Nash equilibrium.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Game Theory
Game theory is the study of strategic interaction among rational decision-makers. In the world of economics, it helps explain how competing firms make decisions considering the reactions of their competitors. For instance, Bud and Wise, two firms in the same market, need to decide how much beer to produce. They must consider not only their own benefits and losses but also anticipate how the other will react. Their decisions are interconnected, creating a 'game' they both play.
Payoff Matrix
A payoff matrix is a tool used in game theory to represent the possible outcomes of different strategies chosen by the players. The matrix displays the payoffs received by each player for every possible combination of strategies. In the case of Bud and Wise:
- If both produce 10,000 gallons: They each earn \(100,000\).
- If Bud produces 20,000 gallons and Wise produces 10,000 gallons: Bud earns \(150,000\) and Wise incurs a loss of \(50,000\).
- If Wise produces 20,000 gallons and Bud produces 10,000 gallons: Wise earns \(150,000\) and Bud incurs a loss of \(50,000\).
- If both produce 20,000 gallons: Both earn zero profit.
Best Response
The term 'best response' in game theory refers to the strategy that yields the highest payoff for a player, given the strategy chosen by the other player. For Bud and Wise:
- If Wise chooses 10,000 gallons, Bud’s best response is 20,000 gallons as it yields \(150,000\) instead of \(100,000\).
- If Wise chooses 20,000 gallons, Bud’s best response remains 20,000 gallons to avoid a loss and break even.
- The same logic applies symmetrically for Wise.
This interdependence in choosing strategies ensures that both players are always opting for their best response.
Economic Profit
Economic profit is the difference between total revenue and total costs, including opportunity costs. It tells us how much a firm gains or loses by operating. When Bud and Wise both produce 10,000 gallons each, they achieve the maximum economic profit of \(100,000\) each.
If one increases their production to 20,000 gallons while the other stays at 10,000 gallons, the firm producing more gains \(150,000\) while the other incurs a loss of \(50,000\).
If both produce 20,000 gallons, their economic profit is zero, demonstrating the competitive nature of oligopolies and the crucial role of strategic decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Gadgets for Sale \(\ldots\) or Not How come the prices of some gadgets, like the iPod, are the same no matter where you shop? No, the answer isn't that Apple illegally manages prices. In reality, Apple uses an accepted retail strategy called minimum advertised price to discourage resellers from discounting. The minimum advertised price \((\mathrm{MAP})\) is the absolute lowest price of a product that resellers can advertise. Marketing subsidies offered by a manufacturer to its resellers usually keep the price at or above the MAP. Stable prices are important to the company that is both a manufacturer and a retailer. If Apple resellers advertised the iPod below cost. they could squeeze the Apple Stores out of their own markets. The downside to the price stability is that by limiting how low sellers can go, MAP keeps prices artificially high (or at least higher than they might otherwise be with unfettered price competition). Source: Slate, December 22, 2006 Why might the MAP strategy be against the social interest and benefit only the producer?

The Asian rice-exporting nations planned to discuss a proposal that they form a cartel. Ahead of the meeting, the countries said that the purpose of the rice cartel would be to contribute to ensuring food stability, not just in an individual country but also to address food shortages in the region and the world. The cartel will not hoard rice and raise prices when there are shortages. The Philippines says that it is a bad idea. It will create an oligopoly, and the cartel could price the grain out of reach for millions of people. Source: CNN, May 6,2008 a. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, explain how they would influence the global market for rice and the world price of rice. b. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, draw a graph to illustrate their influence on the global market for rice. c. Even in the absence of international antitrust laws, why might it be difficult for this cartel to successfully collude? Use the ideas of game theory to explain.

Consider a game with two players who cannot communicate, and in which each player is asked a question. The players can answer honestly or lie. If both answer honestly, each receives \(\$ 100\). If one player answers honestly and the other lies, the liar receives \(\$ 500\) and the honest player gets nothing. If both lie, then each receives \(\$ 50\). a. Describe the strategies and the payoffs. b. Construct the payoff matrix. c. What is the equilibrium of this game? d. Compare this game to the prisoners' dilemma. Are the games similar or different? Explain.

New Entrants Pose a Challenge to Boeing's Share of the Global Commercial Airplane Market Competition is going to get tougher for Boeing. Currently, the global commercial airplane market for airplanes with a seating capacity of over 100 passengers is lead by Boeing and Airbus. Last year, Boeing with 648 commercial airplane deliveries occupied 43 percent of this market. Airbus with 626 commercial airplane deliveries stood second. Source: Forbes, March 06,2014 a. According to Reuters, the market share of Boeing in the large commercial aircraft segment was above 75 percent before 1990 Describe how the structure of the airplane market has changed over the past few decades. b. If Boeing and Airbus formed a cartel, how would the price charged for airplanes and the profits made change?

Why do Coca-Cola and PepsiCo spend huge amounts on advertising? Do they benefit? Does the consumer benefit? Explain your answer by constructing a game to illustrate the choices Coca-Cola and PepsiCo make.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free