Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A good-natured parent knows that children sometimes need punishing but also knows that, when it comes to the crunch, the child will be let off with a warning. Can the parent undertake any pre-commitment to make the threat of punishment credible?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The parent can use consistent rules and external mechanisms to pre-commit and make the threat of punishment credible.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Pre-commitment

Pre-commitment refers to a strategy where a parent makes a decisive plan or action to ensure that future actions will align with current intentions. The goal is to make the threat of punishment seem credible to the child.
02

Establishing Consequences

The parent can set clear and consistent rules with defined consequences for breaking them. By being consistent in the application of these rules, the child begins to understand that specific actions lead to specific outcomes.
03

Using External Mechanisms

A parent might involve an external authority or system, such as a timer for time-outs or a reward-and-penalty chart, to enforce the rules. This objectivity can reinforce the credibility of the consequence by making it less dependent on the parent's fluctuations in mood or decision.
04

Communicating Consistency

By consistently communicating the consequences of certain behaviors and demonstrating follow-through, the child is given a clear message that the rules are not negotiable. This helps in establishing credibility of the threat of punishment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pre-commitment Strategy
In behavioral economics, a pre-commitment strategy is when someone creates a plan to restrict their future actions, ensuring they stick to their intentions. For parents, this means putting strategies in place that make it easier to follow through on promises or threats, such as punishing bad behavior. The idea is to create a situation where parents won’t back out due to emotional impulses.
One way to do this is to set specific consequences ahead of time for specific bad behaviors. This helps the child understand what will happen if they break certain rules. By having these plans in place, parents can reduce the likelihood of making last-minute shifts which might confuse the child.
Moreover, parents can share these pre-commitments with their children to reinforce their credibility. This verbal commitment could be as simple as stating, "If you don't finish your homework, there will be no TV time tonight."
Credible Threats
Credible threats are promises of a consequence that are believable and likely to be carried out. For a parent's threat of punishment to be credible, the child must believe the parent will follow through. Otherwise, the warning loses its power.
Credibility can be achieved in various ways:
  • Setting clear rules and sticking to them consistently
  • Having a history of following through on commitments
  • Communicating the reasons behind consequences so that children understand the fair nature of the punishment
Building credibility requires time and effort. Parents may need to deal with some initial resistance, but over time, consistent follow-through will make their threats believable.
Implementing systems like reward charts or objective timers can also help. By reducing the influence of parental mood, these systems provide a stable framework that reinforces the parent's commitment to prescribed outcomes.
Parenting Strategies
Parenting strategies are the plans and methods parents use to guide and influence their children's behavior. Effective strategies include clear communication, consistency, and the understanding that flexibility can sometimes undermine the lesson.
Using techniques like time-outs, rewards, and consequences help reinforce behavior expectations. For instance, a reward system incentivizes good behavior, while time-outs highlight negative impacts of breaking rules.
Another strategy is empathetic communication. By talking through why specific rules exist and what the consequences are, children may gain a better understanding of long-term goals.
Graphic aids like charts can also assist. These visual reminders help children remember expectations and consequences, making abstract rules more concrete and understandable.
Consistent Rule Enforcement
Consistent rule enforcement is a cornerstone of successful parenting, especially when it comes to behavior management. When rules are enforced consistently, children understand expectations, boundaries, and the dependability of the presented consequences.
Inconsistent enforcement can lead to confusion and testing of boundaries, as children try to figure out where the true limits lie. This can undermine the entire strategy of behavior management.
The key is to maintain uniform application: if a child knows that a rule will apply every time, they are more likely to take it seriously. This consistency builds trust and respect between parent and child, as the child sees the parent as reliable.
Tools like behavior charts or routine schedules reinforce consistent rules by adding structure. These tools make expectations predictable, helping children anticipate and align their actions with family standards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

'Globalization, by increasing the size of the market, reduces market power of individual firms and the need to address strategic interactions.' 'Globalization makes mergers more attractive and thus enhances worries about market power.' Is either of these views correct? Or are both correct?

Consider a market with two firms, 1 and 2 , producing a homogeneous good. The market demand is \(P=100-3\left(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\right)\), where \(Q_{1}\) is the quantity produced by firm 1 and \(Q_{2}\) is the quantity produced by firm 2 . The total cost for firm 1 is \(T C_{1}=\) \(40 Q_{1}\), while the total cost for firm 2 is \(T C_{2}=40 Q_{2}\). Each firm behaves like a competitive firm. a) What is the equilibrium quantity in the market? b) Suppose both firms exhibit Cournot behaviour. Given that their reaction functions are \(Q_{1}=20-2 Q_{2}\) and \(Q_{2}=20-2 Q_{1}\), how would their output change compared to \((\mathrm{a}) ?\)

Two identical firms, 1 and 2, compete on quantities. The reaction function of firm 1 is \(\mathrm{Q}_{1}=15-1 / 2 \mathrm{Q}_{2}\), while for firm 2 we have \(\mathrm{Q}_{2}=15-1 / 2 \mathrm{Q}_{1}\), In the table below we have the total quantity produced in the market: $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline Q 1+Q 2 & 2 & 6 & 10 & 14 & 18 & 22 & 26 & 30 & 34 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Using the fact that both firms must produce the same quantity, plot the reaction functions of the two firms in a graph. How is the equilibrium quantity determined?

'Since a firm's optimal behaviour depends on how it believes that its rival(s) will react, there are as many output decisions, and hence equilibriums, as there are guesses about what rivals will do.' How do economists try to narrow down the assumptions that firms make about their rivals?

Why are these statements wrong? (a) Competitive firms should get together to restrict output and drive up the price. (b) Firms would not advertise unless they expected advertising to increase sales. (c) A firm in a monopolistically competitive market faces a horizontal demand curve for its product.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free