Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a)Explain why it might make sense for a firm to produce goods that it can only sell at a loss. (b) Can it keep on doing this forever? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A firm might sell at a loss for strategic reasons, but it can't do so indefinitely without becoming profitable.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Conditions

A firm may produce goods it sells at a loss when it expects future benefits that outweigh current losses. These can include gaining market share, establishing consumer loyalty, or achieving economies of scale.
02

Analyze Short-Term Strategy

In the short term, a firm might choose to sell at a loss to drive out competition or to penetrate a market, with the expectation that it will later raise prices or reduce costs to become profitable.
03

Consider Long-Term Viability

While selling at a loss can be part of a strategic plan, it is unsustainable in the long run without a return to profitability. The firm might exhaust its financial resources and face insolvency if it doesn't eventually generate profits.
04

Evaluate External Factors

The ability of a firm to sustain losses is also influenced by external factors such as investor patience, access to capital, and market conditions that might support a turnaround in profitability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Share
Gaining market share is often a crucial goal for many businesses. This refers to the portion of a market controlled by a particular company. When a firm enhances its market share, it means more customers choose its products over competitors.

To achieve this, a company may temporarily lower prices or even sell at a loss. The idea is to attract a significant number of new customers. Once these customers experience the product or service, they may continue to purchase even when prices later increase slightly.
  • A larger market share usually means stronger market influence.
  • With more customers, the company can build a reputation and brand strength.
  • Initially accepting losses can lead to a more stable customer base in the future.
It's like a long-term investment where the goal is not immediate profit but establishing a strong presence in the marketplace.
Consumer Loyalty
Consumer loyalty is another critical factor that can justify initial losses in sales. It represents the ongoing preference and support a customer shows to a brand over others. Companies often strive to develop strong customer loyalty through high-quality products, excellent service, and reliable brand interactions.

Building loyalty can have significant long-term benefits for a firm. Loyal consumers are likely to make repeat purchases, even at higher prices, which can lead to increased future profits.
  • Loyal customers are more likely to recommend the product to others, expanding the customer base.
  • Maintaining consumer loyalty can reduce marketing costs since happy customers often spread the word.
  • It's easier to keep existing customers than to attract new ones.
By fostering consumer loyalty, a company can secure consistent revenue streams and strengthen its market position.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale refer to the cost advantages a firm can obtain due to the scale of operation. When a company produces a high volume of goods, the cost per unit can decrease because fixed costs are spread over more units and volume discounts can be achieved in resource purchases.

This production efficiency allows a company to reduce prices and stay competitive without incurring losses in the long-term.
  • Larger production levels can lead to more efficient processes.
  • Bulk purchasing often leads to lower costs from suppliers.
  • Fixed costs, such as rent and salaries, get distributed across more units, decreasing the cost per unit.
In essence, economies of scale can enable a firm to reduce price per unit and outperform competitors, potentially gaining market share even if short-term losses are involved.
Short-Term Losses
Short-term losses can be strategically deployed as a means to a greater end. A business might choose to endure these losses for several reasons, such as penetrating a new market or overpowering competitors.

When a company enters a new market, it might lower prices to attract customers away from existing brands. Alternatively, a company may at times sell at a loss to drive competitors out, making room for a future monopoly.
  • This strategy requires a careful assessment of financial capabilities.
  • The idea is to recover losses eventually through increased market share and product price adjustments.
  • Short-term losses should always be monitored to avoid unsustainable business practices.
While short-term losses can assist in achieving business goals, a firm must be cautious to ensure it doesn't compromise its financial stability.
Long-Term Profitability
Achieving long-term profitability is the ultimate goal for any business strategy. This is where the benefits from initial losses start to yield returns. A firm must transition from generating losses to securing profits to thrive and sustain its operations.

Once a company has established a solid customer base and perhaps gained significant market share, it can begin to increase prices or reduce production costs.
  • It involves a balance between pricing strategies, cost management, and market expansion.
  • Maintaining consumer loyalty plays a substantial role in ensuring steady returns.
  • A focus on innovation and quality can lead to a durable competitive advantage.
For long-term profitability, a firm needs to strategically plan when to pivot from expansion tactics back to profit-focused operations.
External Factors
External factors encompass the various conditions outside a company's control that can influence its business strategy and outcomes. These include market trends, economic conditions, financing options, and regulatory environments.

The impact of these factors is substantial, as they can either facilitate or hinder a company’s ability to sustain losses and return to profitability.
  • Investor patience and access to capital determine how long a company can endure losses.
  • Economic downturns or regulatory changes may affect operational costs.
  • Changes in consumer preferences can rapidly alter market dynamics.
Businesses must stay agile and informed, assessing these external environments to adapt and modify strategies as needed to ensure their continuity and success.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below shows how output changes as inputs change for three different output levels. The wage rate is \(£ 5\) and the rental rate of capital is \(£ 2\). $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|c|c|l|c|} \hline & \text { Column } 1 & \text { Column } 2 & \text { Column } 3 & \text { Column } 4 & \text { Column } 5 & \text { Column } 6 \\ \hline \text { Caplral input } & 4 & 2 & 7 & 4 & 11 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Labour input } & 5 & 6 & 10 & 12 & 15 & 16 \\ \hline \text { Output } & 4 & 4 & 8 & 8 & 12 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. For each output level in the above table, which technique of production is more capital intensive? b. Refer to columns 2,3 and 6 . Does the firm switch towards or away from more capital-intensive techniques as output rises?

For each of the following cases explain how long you think the short run is: a) a power station; (b) a hypermarket; (c) a small grocery retail business. In explaining your answer, specify any assumptions you need to make. For each case, do you expect the law of diminishing marginal returns to hold?

Common fallacies Why are these statements wrong? (a) Firms making losses should quit at once. (b) Big firms can always produce more cheaply than smaller firms can. (c) Small-scale production is always better.

The marginal cost of supplying another unit of output of an electronic product via the Internet is almost zero. If long-run equilibrium means price equals marginal cost, all Internet firms will go bust. Can you resolve this situation?

(a) What information does the production function provide? (b) Explain why the production function does not provide enough information for anyone actually to runa firm

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free