Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The own-price elasticity of demand for food is negative. The demand for food is inelastic. A higher food price increases spending on food. Higher food prices imply less is spent on all other goods. The quantity demanded of each of these other goods falls. Discuss each statement. Are they all correct?

Short Answer

Expert verified
All statements are correct given the assumptions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Own-Price Elasticity of Demand

Own-price elasticity of demand measures how the quantity demanded of a good responds to changes in its price. It's given by the formula \( E_d = \frac{\%\text{ change in quantity demanded}}{\%\text{ change in price}} \). A negative value indicates that demand decreases as price increases, which is typical for most goods.
02

Inelastic Demand Defined

Demand is inelastic when the absolute value of own-price elasticity is less than 1. This means that a percentage change in price results in a smaller percentage change in quantity demanded. Therefore, consumers do not reduce their quantity demanded significantly when prices increase.
03

Impact of Higher Prices on Spending for Inelastic Goods

For inelastic goods, an increase in price leads to an increase in total revenue because the percentage decrease in quantity demanded is less than the percentage increase in price. This implies that spending (price times quantity) on such goods rises as prices rise.
04

Consequences on Budget and Other Goods

If spending on food (an inelastic good) increases with price, consumers have less budget left for other goods. This is a result of the budget constraint. As a consequence, the demand for other goods, which are presumably elastic, will decrease since consumers have fewer resources to allocate to them.
05

Verifying Each Statement

1. The own-price elasticity of demand for food is negative: Correct, as most goods have a negative elasticity due to the inverse relationship between price and demand. 2. The demand for food is inelastic: Correct by given assumption. 3. A higher food price increases spending on food: Correct for inelastic demand. 4. Higher food prices imply less is spent on all other goods: Correct, due to a limited budget. 5. The quantity demanded of each of these other goods falls: Correct if other goods are elastic or if they belong to normal or luxury goods category.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Inelastic Demand
Inelastic demand refers to a situation where the demand for a product does not significantly change even when its price goes up or down. This happens when the absolute value of the own-price elasticity is less than 1. In simpler terms, if prices increase by a certain percentage, the quantity demanded drops by a smaller percentage.

For instance, if the price of bread increases, people will generally continue to purchase it because it is a necessity. They cannot easily reduce the quantity they buy, unless there are substitute goods that are significantly cheaper and similar in quality.
  • The demand for necessities, like food, is typically inelastic.
  • Consumers continue purchasing despite changes in price.
Budget Constraint
A budget constraint represents the limited amount of income available to consumers to spend on goods and services. Every consumer faces this limit, impacting how they allocate their spending across different items.

When prices rise, especially for an inelastic good like food, consumers may be forced to adjust their spending habits due to their budget constraint. This often means spending more of their available income on the inelastic good, leaving less for other items.
  • Consumers have limited income to allocate across various goods and services.
  • Rising prices of inelastic goods can reduce spending flexibility on other items.
Price and Demand Relationship
The relationship between price and demand is a fundamental concept in economics. Typically, demand decreases as prices increase. This inverse relationship is why the own-price elasticity of demand is generally negative.

In the case of inelastic goods, even though prices go up, the quantity demanded doesn't drop much. This results in higher total revenue for sellers, since consumers continue buying nearly the same amount, despite the higher costs. Thus, for inelastic goods, higher prices generally lead to increased spending.
  • Price increase usually leads to demand decrease; however, less so for inelastic goods.
  • Inelastic goods can result in increased revenue due to consistent demand.
Spending Behavior
Spending behavior reflects how consumers allocate their money in different situations. When faced with higher prices for inelastic goods, consumers may adapt their spending in various ways.

For example, if the cost of food goes up significantly, consumers might cut back on non-essential purchases such as entertainment or luxury goods. Even though the quantity demanded for food remains relatively stable, because of the necessity, spending on other flexible or luxury items tends to decrease.
  • People adjust spending based on necessities and available budget.
  • Higher prices for inelastic goods lead to reduced spending on non-essentials.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Common fallacies Why are these statements wrong? (a) Since consumers do not know about indifference curves or budget lines, they cannot choose the point on the budget line tangent to the highest possible indifference curve. (b) Inflation must reduce demand since prices are higher and goods are more expensive.

Consider a consumer who consumes only two goods, peas and beans. He has an income of \(£ 10\), the price of beans is \(20 \mathrm{p}\) per \(\mathrm{kg}(=£ 0.2)\) and the price of peas is \(40 \mathrm{p}\) per \(\mathrm{kg}(=£ 0.4)\). (a) Suppose that the consumer consumes \(30 \mathrm{~kg}\) of beans. Assuming that the consumer wants to spend all his income, how many \(\mathrm{kg}\) of peas is he going to consume? (b) Assume that the price of peas falls from \(40 \mathrm{p}\) to \(20 \mathrm{p}\). Assuming that the consumer still consumes \(30 \mathrm{~kg}\) of beans, find the new quantity of peas. (c) After the decrease in the price of peas to \(20 \mathrm{p}\), assume that the consumer is just as well off as he was in (a) if he has an income of \(£ 7.60\). However, with that income and the new price of peas he would have consumed \(20 \mathrm{~kg}\) of beans. Find the quantity of peas he would have consumed in this case. (d) Find the substitution effect on consumption of peas due to the decrease in the price of peas in \((\mathrm{c})\) (e) Find the income effect on consumption of peas due to the decrease in income \(\operatorname{in}(\mathrm{c})\)

Suppose that Carl cannot tell the differences between a pack of British and a pack of Danish bacon. In a graph with British bacon on the vertical axis, plot some of Carl's indifference curves for British and Danish bacon, Suppose that Carl has an income of \(£ 20\). The price of Danish bacon is \(£ 2\) per pack, while the price of British bacon is \(£ 4\) per pack. Using the same graph, draw Carl's budget constraint and show his optimal bundle choice.

You can invest in a safe asset, in a risky asset, or in both. The safe asset has a guaranteed return of 3 per cent a year. The risky asset has an expected return of 4 per cent but it could be as much as 8 per cent or as little as 0 per cent. You decide to have some of your wealth in each asset. Now the expected return on the risky asset rises to 5 per cent; it could be as high as 9 per cent or as low as 1 per cent. Given the increase in the expected return on the risky asset, do you invest more of your wealth in the risky asset?

Suppose Frank has an income of \(£ 50\), the unit price of \(X\) is \(P_{X}=£ 2\) and the unit price of \(Y\) is \(P_{Y}=£ 1\). Write down the budget constraint for Frank. Knowing that the marginal rate of substitution (in absolute value) between \(X\) and \(Y\) is \(M R S=\) \(X / Y\), find the optimal bundle that Frank should consume. (Hint: at the optimal bundle, the absolute value of the \(M R S\) must be equal to the absolute value of the slope of the budget constraint. Moreover, the budget constraint must be satisfied. You need to solve a system of two equations in two variables, \(X\) and \(Y\).)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free